By analyzing evidence from government reports, medical studies, and abductee case files, this investigation proposes a Dual Effect Model of UAP contact
The Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) reporton anomalous biological effects from UAP encounters has confirmed that exposure to these unknown craft can result in radiation burns, ocular damage, neurological trauma, and even unexplained pregnancies.
Yet, the question remains: Are these effects merely unintended byproducts of contact, or is there a deliberate agenda at play?
By analyzing evidence from government reports, medical studies, and abductee case files, this investigation proposes a Dual Effect Model of UAP contact:
Accidental Exposure: Many injuries—burns, radiation-like sickness, eye damage—are likely caused by proximity to exotic propulsion or energy systems beyond our understanding.
Deliberate Biological Manipulation: Some encounters show signs of direct intervention, including medical experimentation, reproductive interference, and cognitive control.
The implications of this are profound. If UAP interactions cause measurable harm, then the phenomenon is not just a curiosity—it is a potential public health and national security issue. Whether these encounters stem from indifference, experimentation, or an unknown long-term agenda, they demand serious investigation.
This report aims to reframe the conversation about UAP and non-human intelligence—moving beyond sensationalism and skepticism to examine the real-world effects on human beings. By confronting the evidence, we can better understand the nature of these encounters and prepare for whatever reality may emerge.
Next Sections Will Cover: ✔️ Breakdown of DIA medical findings ✔️ Evidence of energy-related exposure injuries ✔️ Abduction cases involving direct medical interference ✔️ Implications for national security and human sovereignty
1. Accidental Exposure to Energy Fields (Unintended Consequence)
Hypothesis: UAP may emit strong electromagnetic, radioactive, or unknown energy fields that inadvertently cause biological effects when humans come too close.
Supporting Evidence:
Radiation-Like Injuries: Some reported burns and hair loss resemble symptoms of radiation exposure, which can occur near high-energy propulsion systems.
Eye Damage & Photophobia: Intense bursts of light or high-frequency radiation could cause ocular issues.
Neurological Disruptions: EMF (Electromagnetic Fields) have been shown to impact brainwave activity, potentially explaining anxiety, sleep disruption, and headaches.
Implication: If UAP function using an advanced energy source, exposure to this field could unintentionally harm humans. They may not be attacking us—just operating on a level of physics we don’t understand yet.
2. Physiological Shock from Non-Human Interaction (Psychosomatic Effects)
Hypothesis: The psychological shock of an encounter with a UAP or non-human intelligence could trigger severe stress responses, manifesting as physical symptoms.
Supporting Evidence:
PTSD-Like Symptoms: Multiple studies have shown that abductees experience PTSD even when they don’t recall trauma.
Autonomic Nervous System Overload: The fight-or-flight response could lead to nausea, heart palpitations, and fatigue.
Placebo Effect Reversed? Just as belief in healing can improve health, an encounter with an unfamiliar intelligence might disrupt biological homeostasis through sheer cognitive dissonance.
Implication: The mind-body connection plays a huge role in health. If UAP and non-human intelligence operate on a cognitive level beyond ours, even benign encounters might cause trauma-like effects due to sensory and psychological overload.
3. Intentional Manipulation or Experimentation (Malicious or Indifferent Intent)
Hypothesis: Some UAP interactions could involve deliberate experimentation on human physiology, whether for research, control, or other unknown motives.
Supporting Evidence:
Missing Time & Abduction Cases: Many abductees report being taken and subjected to medical-like procedures.
Hybridization Programs (David Jacobs’ Work): Some researchers suggest prolonged genetic experimentation on humans.
Government Reports of “Unaccounted-for Pregnancies”: This suggests a reproductive or biological interest in humans.
Implication: If this hypothesis is correct, non-human intelligence may not view human well-being as a priority. The negative physiological effects could be a result of:
Indifference: Like how we tag and release animals for study.
Control Measures: Memory suppression could cause neurological issues.
Hybridization/Biological Experimentation: The physical symptoms might be side effects of procedures.
Effect Type
Cause
Symptoms
Key Cases
Source
Accidental Exposure
Energy Fields
Burns, Eye Damage, Radiation Sickness
Cash-Landrum, Travis Walton
DIA Report
Psychosomatic
Psychological Shock
PTSD, Fatigue, Anxiety
John Mack Studies
Peer-Reviewed Literature
Deliberate Manipulation
Medical Experimentation
Implants, Pregnancy, Scoop Marks
Betty & Barney Hill, Jacobs’ Cases
DIA, Jacobs
So, Which Explanation Fits Best?
It could be a mix of all three depending on the context.
If symptoms occur during a close encounter without abduction, it may be due to energy field exposure (Hypothesis #1).
If the effects appear later without memory of an event, it may be a psychological or neurological reaction (Hypothesis #2).
If memory gaps and medical anomalies appear, it may indicate direct experimentation (Hypothesis #3).
What’s clear is that the DIA report suggests something real is happening—whether it’s unintended exposure or deliberate manipulation remains uncertain.
1. Accidental Exposure to Energy Fields (Unintended Effect)
Key Idea:
Many of the reported burns, neurological symptoms, and radiation-like injuries could result from close proximity to UAP technology, rather than intentional harm.
If UAP use exotic propulsion systems—such as electromagnetic, plasma, or quantum field manipulation—then humans who get too close may suffer biological damage due to intense energy exposure.
Supporting Evidence:
DIA Report (Declassified): Lists radiation-like effects, eye injuries, and burns as common symptoms of UAP encounters.
Pentagon’s AATIP Research (2010s): Studies on UAP-induced physiological effects found evidence of radiation sickness and cellular damage in military personnel and civilians.
Travis Walton Case (1975): Walton reported an intense energy burst when he approached a UFO, rendering him unconscious and resulting in mild radiation-like symptoms.
Cash-Landrum Incident (1980): Witnesses exposed to a hovering UFO developed severe radiation burns and long-term health issues, suggesting intense EM or nuclear-like exposure.
Implication:
If UAP technology inherently emits strong energy fields, then human injuries might be an unintended byproduct of its operation.
Non-human intelligence may not even recognize human biological vulnerabilities, or they might consider collateral damage acceptable.
3. Intentional Manipulation or Experimentation (Deliberate Effect)
Key Idea:
Some UAP encounters show signs of deliberate physical interference, such as medical procedures, genetic sampling, and neurological manipulation.
The physical aftereffects in abductees suggest direct interaction with human biology, beyond mere environmental exposure.
🔎 Supporting Evidence:
David Jacobs’ Abduction Research: Many abductees recall medical procedures (often reproductive in nature) performed aboard UAP.
DIA Report: Mentions “unaccounted-for pregnancies” in abductees, suggesting physical alterations.
Harvard Psychiatrist John Mack: His studies on abductees found psychological trauma and persistent physical symptoms that were not easily explained by normal sleep paralysis or memory distortion.
Frequent Physical Marks on Abductees: Many report scoop marks, bruises, and implants after their experiences.
Betty and Barney Hill Case (1961): Barney suffered genital trauma, while Betty received a needle-like procedure to the abdomen, consistent with reported reproductive experiments.
Whitley Strieber’s Communion (1987): Describes highly invasive encounters with non-human entities, including neurological and sexual manipulation.
Implication:
Non-human intelligence seems interested in biological and genetic research.
Memory manipulation suggests a control mechanism—they don’t want abductees recalling these experiences.
Some effects (e.g., PTSD, neural trauma, physical injuries) may result from cognitive or medical interference rather than just radiation exposure.
Synthesizing the Theory: A Dual Effect Model
UAP Contact Can Cause Physical Harm in Two Ways:
Accidental Exposure (Environmental Damage)
Humans suffer burns, radiation, ocular damage from proximity to UAP propulsion systems.
This may not be intentional—just an effect of unknown energy fields.
Similar to radiation poisoning from nuclear exposure or EMF effects.
Deliberate Biological Manipulation
Some cases clearly involve direct human interference (abductions, medical procedures, genetic sampling).
The presence of memory suppression, implants, and genetic manipulation suggests intelligence behind the events.
Non-human entities seem to operate with an agenda—possibly hybridization, control, or experimentation.
Final Thoughts: A Disturbing but Logical Conclusion
Most UAP-related injuries are likely due to energy exposure, like radiation, plasma fields, or high-frequency EM waves.
Some cases, however, show direct manipulation—abductions, medical procedures, reproductive experiments.
The entities involved do not seem concerned with human well-being, reinforcing the idea that they operate under different moral frameworks (or simply do not see humans as we see ourselves).
The hybridization agenda (David Jacobs) and UAP energy field dangers (DIA Report) are not mutually exclusive.
Non-human intelligence may treat Earth as a laboratory, where our exposure to their presence is both a side effect and part of a larger, intentional plan.
Bottom Line: Even if UAPs are not hostile in a traditional sense, they are not acting with human interests as a priority. The DIA’s medical reports, abductee testimony, and historical cases all point toward a complex phenomenon that involves both accidental exposure and deliberate interference.
Between 1997 and 2000, the UK’s Defence Intelligence Staff generated Project Condign, a report asserting the existence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). It suggests UAPs engage in non-kinetic interactions, potentially influencing cognition and radar. The report hints at military implications but remained largely ignored by the media and peer review.
Between 1997 and 2000, the UK’s Defence Intelligence Staff conducted a study on UAPs that was later released with minimal fanfare. Titled Unidentified Aerial Phenomena in the UK Air Defence Region, the 400-page report—commonly known as Project Condign—contains conclusions that, if taken seriously, would shift the conversation on UAPs into the domain of plasma physics, cognitive modulation, and electromagnetic weaponization.
This article revisits the report not as a historical curiosity—but as a signal missed in the noise, and perhaps a partial map to the kind of non-kinetic phenomena we’re seeing increasingly in modern telemetry.
Plasma as the Fourth State of Matter
What the Report Actually Says
Project Condign’s conclusion is not subtle:
“The existence of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), as reported in this study, is indisputable.”
That sentence alone should’ve warranted front-page headlines in 2006. It didn’t. Why? Because the framing that followed attempted to domesticate the extraordinary: UAPs, it said, are likely buoyant plasma formations—charged atmospheric phenomena capable of producing radar returns and visual anomalies, but not under intelligent control.
Yet the report simultaneously includes these claims:
Some UAPs are observable to radar and optical systems.
These phenomena can induce “localised enhancements of refractive index,” affecting visibility and perception.
Close encounters may influence the human brain via EM interactions, potentially explaining abduction narratives or visionary states.
In short: the UK government quietly admitted UAPs are real, possibly physical, possibly able to interfere with brain function, and potentially exploitable for defense applications.
Pattern Recognition: Reframing the Plasma Hypothesis
Here’s the pivot: the “plasma” explanation is not debunking—it’s a partial modeling. The data patterns it seeks to explain (sustained light forms, radar-visible structures, EM interference) are very similar to the cases observed today in more sophisticated sensor environments.
FLIR signatures from the USS Princeton/Tic Tac case
Hessdalen light emissions with coherent spectral peaks
Transient EM field anomalies reported during CE2/CE3 events
All may fall within the same domain of coherent non-equilibrium plasma structures—which, under certain interpretations, might host or transmit information (whether intelligent or not remains an open question).
A Tactful Suppression
Condign was never peer-reviewed. The MoD distanced itself from it almost immediately, labeling it “internal.” The media barely engaged. But one line from the report suggests deeper institutional unease:
“The relevance of plasma and electromagnetic fields to weapon development… should not be overlooked.”
This isn’t just about UFOs. It’s about the physics of control systems, biological effects, and exotic propagation mediums. What if Condign wasn’t designed to reveal the truth—but to contain it inside a box of plausible deniability?
Click for an archvied link to the full Condign Report
Appendix:
What Is a Non-Kinetic Phenomenon?
In military and scientific terms, non-kinetic phenomena refer to events or effects that don’t involve physical impact or conventional motion-based interaction. Instead of bullets, missiles, or physical collisions (i.e., kinetic energy), non-kinetic effects operate through fields, waves, and information—like electromagnetic pulses (EMP), directed energy, plasma formations, or neural modulation.
They change systems or perceptions without touching them physically.
Why This Concept Fits UAPs
Many well-documented UAP cases show characteristics far more consistent with non-kinetic effects than with traditional vehicles or weapons. Here’s how:
1. EM Interference Without Impact
Example: 1980 Rendlesham Forest incident – military witnesses reported vehicle malfunctions and radio issues in the presence of a glowing object.
Interpretation: A localized, possibly directed EM field affecting electronics—no visible “weapon,” no physical contact.
2. Perception Modulation
Example: Project Condign theorized that plasma-based UAPs might affect neurological function via EM interaction.
Modern Support: Witnesses in CE2/CE3 events often describe missing time, paralysis, or shared hallucination-like episodes. These could stem from EM-induced cognitive interference.
3. Lack of Sonic Boom or Heat Signature
Example: Tic Tac UAP (2004) moved at supersonic speeds but produced no sonic boom, no heat plume, and no visible means of propulsion.
Interpretation: The object’s movement may not be kinetic at all—what’s observed could be projected position, field-based translation, or light propagation anomaly.
4. Sensor-Specific Visibility
Example: Multiple Navy UAP incidents showed objects only appearing on radar, infrared, or FLIR, but not visible to the naked eye.
Implication: These are selectively interacting with the environment, possibly manipulating which wavelengths or sensors detect them.
5. Environmental Anomalies Without Mass
Example: Hessdalen Lights and Skinwalker Ranch phenomena show measurable EM changes, radiation bursts, or infrared light with no corresponding solid object.
Interpretation: These may be coherent energy formations—plasma, or something more exotic—interfacing with the environment without mass or momentum.
Seismic Activity: A link has been noted by Dr. Michael Persinger, and a new crop of researchers such as Miguel A. Galán are contributing to a growing body of research on UAP and electroballs.
Conclusion: Not “Craft”—Field Events
The consistent absence of:
Sonic booms
Heat trails
Inertial motion
Physical propulsion
…suggests that at least some UAPs are better described as non-kinetic events—field-based, energy-based, or intentional manipulations of space, perception, and systems.
This is why Project Condign’s conclusions, though framed as “natural plasma,” might actually be pointing toward engineered, intelligent, non-kinetic phenomena—interacting with us and our instruments in ways we barely understand.
We discuss the complexities surrounding UAP and UFO phenomena, emphasizing the influence of dogma on perception and belief systems. It explores how scientific, religious, and cultural frameworks hinder understanding. The phenomenon is characterized as non-material and interactive, suggesting that it adapts to human cognition and influences reality perception.
If you’ve been following our podcast, and if you are reading this you likely are, you are now familiar with our infamous Hacking UFO Understanding episode. In this episode we broke down our current conclusions of the UAP and UFO phenomenon.
We promised a write up and so it is below. First, there is a brief explanation of the theory and then there is what constitutes “proof” of the theory.
We used better tools, different models and more data. Yet, we ended in a similar spot as John Keel and Jaques Vallee. Which isn’t a bad thing. The more independent verification of a theory we get, the closer we get to better anwers…however they may come.
Our UFO blindspot is Dogma. The elusive answers to the UAP mystery.
If dogma is a programmed blindspot, then the phenomenon isn’t just interacting with us physically—it’s shaping our perception, belief structures, and even epistemology (how we define what’s real and what isn’t).
Let’s break this down.
The Phenomenon’s Influence on Dogma
If the UAP phenomenon actively exploits dogma, it would mean:
It reinforces rigid belief structures—whether that’s scientific skepticism, religious doctrine, or institutional authority—to keep itself outside of acceptable discourse.
It thrives on polarity—proponents vs. skeptics, nuts-and-bolts vs. consciousness models, believers vs. materialists—ensuring no unified approach can be taken.
It conditions perception—similar to how some UFO witnesses report selective amnesia or inexplicable changes in their interpretation of events over time.
If this is correct, then dogma isn’t just a human response to UAP—it could be a fundamental part of how the phenomenon sustains its secrecy.
Examples of Dogma as a UAP Defense Mechanism
Scientific Orthodoxy as a Firewall
The modern scientific establishment is built on reductionism and repeatability.
UAP, by its nature, appears to defy repeatability—which makes it anathema to most institutional science.
The result? The phenomenon remains unstudied because it isn’t allowed to be studied.
Religious Doctrine as a Conceptual Barrier
Many religions already have answers for UAP-like phenomena (angels, demons, deceptions).
Any new paradigm must fit into an existing belief system, or it is rejected outright.
The result? UAP stays locked within supernatural or folkloric narratives, avoiding serious analysis.
Pop Culture and the Government Psy-Op Angle
The public image of UFOs is shaped by Hollywood, conspiracy culture, and disinformation campaigns.
Every possible theory is polluted with contradictions, hoaxes, and social ridicule.
The result? No coherent consensus emerges, keeping the phenomenon undefined.
So, Is Dogma the Perfect Defense Mechanism?
It’s almost too effective to be random. If dogma is a programmed response—whether by the phenomenon itself or by external controllers—then UAP operates within human cognition and culture, not just in physical reality.
This ties directly into perception control and reality manipulation. If UAP needs belief structures to keep itself unnoticed, it suggests that belief itself might be a medium of interaction—which would explain why sightings, experiences, and understanding of UAP change based on cultural and individual factors.
Theory Summary:
The phenomenon is not extraterrestrial in the traditional sense. It is:
Perceptually entangled with consciousness
Interactive, reflective, and adaptive
Sometimes benevolent, sometimes deceptive
Tied to archetypes, symbols, and altered states
Possibly part of a larger control system or reactive interface that uses belief and perception to manifest
This is Keel’s Super Spectrum + Vallée’s Control System Hypothesis, now informed by:
Quantum physics (observer-dependent state collapse)
How Much Proof Do We Have?
Let’s break it down by domain:
1. Experiential Consistency
Thousands of witness testimonies across cultures and time report:
Trickster behavior
Reality distortion
Time loss
Synchronicity and precognition
Patterns emerge regardless of technology, geography, or belief
Proof Type: Ethnographic + Narrative Consistency 🟢 Strong—this is what led Vallée to abandon the ETH in favor of interdimensional or psychic interface models.
2. Psychological and Physiological Effects
Documented effects include:
EM interference
Radiation burns
PTSD-like symptoms
PSI enhancement or disruption
Altered brainwave states during contact
Proof Type: Case studies (OSAP, Skinwalker, CE5 participants, Monroe Institute) 🟡 Moderate—difficult to replicate under controlled conditions, but reliably reported.
3. Symbolic and Archetypal Convergence
Contact experiences, dreams, and trance states frequently align with:
Jungian archetypes
Religious and mythological motifs
Folkloric patterns (fairies, demons, gods)
Psychedelic entity reports
Proof Type: Semiotic and cultural pattern analysis 🟢 Strong—this is what Keel called the “psychic slideshow” projected by the phenomenon.
4. Interaction with Belief and Perception
Contact alters depending on:
The experiencer’s expectations
Emotional state
Environment (e.g., liminal zones, sacred sites)
Group intent
Proof Type: Parapsychology, remote viewing studies, CE5 protocols 🟡 Moderate—empirically slippery, but reproducible in modified consciousness states.
5. Scientific Analogues Emerging
Interface theory (Hoffman): We don’t see reality, we see a user interface.
Simulation theory: Reality may be informational, not material.
Quantum cognition models: Mind-matter interaction may be real.
Proof Type: Theoretical + Experimental + Philosophical convergence 🟢 Growing support from mainstream-adjacent thinkers.
So… Is This Proof?
Not in the materialist sense. But in the Fortean sense, where truth emerges from pattern recognition across contradictory domains, yes. We’re dealing with something that chooses to not be provable in classical terms. And that choice may be part of its function.
The Keel-Vallée-RamX Convergence
Thinker
Model
Key Insight
John Keel
Super Spectrum
UAPs are part of a larger reality overlayed on ours; responsive to belief
Jacques Vallée
Control System
The phenomenon teaches, tests, and evolves human consciousness
Fortean Winds
Reactive Interface
Perception shapes reality; entities exploit or inhabit its structure; simulation may be involved
What Happens When We Bypass the Dogma Firewall?
If we remove the constraints of scientific materialism, religious frameworks, and institutional skepticism, what do we actually see?
Here’s a raw, unfiltered list of UAP characteristics, stripped of dogmatic interpretations:
1. Shape and Perception Adaptability
UAP don’t have a single true form—they morph based on observer expectations.
Plasma-like, mechanical, biological, shadowy entities—all possibly different presentations of the same thing.
Witnesses often see different things in the same event—indicating reality itself may be flexible in these encounters.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP are not “craft” in the way we understand them. They are adaptive expressions of an unknown intelligence.
2. Non-Locality (Here and Not Here)
UAP exhibit instantaneous movement, trans-medium travel, and spontaneous materialization/dematerialization.
Witnesses describe “it was there, and then it wasn’t”—as if perception itself was manipulated.
They don’t just move through space—they move through perception.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP are not bound by physical location. They exist inside and outside perception simultaneously.
3. Intelligence Beyond Human Constructs
UAP react to human thoughts, fears, and expectations.
They demonstrate non-verbal communication, sometimes described as “knowing” or instant downloads of information.
Encounters feel scripted, almost as if they are playing a role rather than revealing their true nature.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP may not be extraterrestrial, cryptoterrestrial, or interdimensional—but something that operates beyond those categories entirely.
4. Symbolism and Archetypal Influence
UAP encounters mirror myths, religious visions, and folklore throughout history.
Ancient “gods,” medieval “fairies,” and modern “aliens” might be different masks of the same intelligence.
UAP often seem deeply tied to human consciousness and belief systems—they reflect us back at ourselves.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP interactions are partially constructed by human expectation, indicating a co-created phenomenon.
5. Control Over Time and Space
UAP sightings cluster near tunnels, caves, ancient sites—as if tied to specific locations in history.
Some reports suggest time distortion, missing time, or glimpses into parallel realities.
They can appear in the past, present, and future accounts with eerie consistency.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP manipulate time itself—or exist outside of linear time as we know it.
6. Trickster-Like Nature
UAP encounters rarely provide clear answers—instead, they create confusion, contradictions, and paradoxes.
They often lead people to belief, only to later undermine that belief.
Mimicry is a common theme—UAP pretend to be something understandable but never fully reveal themselves.
🡆 Without Dogma: UAP are not here to “disclose” themselves—they function as an intelligence that interacts with us on shifting, unpredictable terms.
What This Means
If we bypass dogma, UAP are not spacecraft, spirits, demons, or hallucinations—they are:
Adaptive, sentient expressions of an unknown intelligence.
Non-local, time-independent, and partially perception-based.
Deeply intertwined with human consciousness and belief systems.
More interested in controlling perception than in making open contact.
This would explain why disclosure never comes—not because someone is covering it up, but because the very nature of the phenomenon defies the reality structures we rely on.
We aren’t seeing UAP for what they are. We are seeing what we are allowed to see.
Key Patterns in UAP Influence
Science & Innovation – UAP-linked figures often experience sudden knowledge breakthroughs, sometimes claiming external guidance.
Religion & Mythology – Many major faiths encode UAP encounters as divine events, creating belief structures that may shield the phenomenon.
History & Academia – There is clear suppression or reclassification of UAP-adjacent research as myth or pseudoscience.
Government & Power – Elites seek control of UAP knowledge and may have engaged in hidden research for technology or influence.
At Fortean Winds, we propose that paranormal phenomena, such as Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) and the Hitchhiker Effect, may stem from quantum interactions. The CIA’s secret investigations validated EVP’s existence, suggesting that these anomalies could reveal deeper truths about reality, challenging existing scientific skepticism and prompting further exploration into the unknown.
At Fortean Winds, we’ve long believed that paranormal phenomena aren’t merely superstition—they’re misunderstood aspects of reality awaiting scientific understanding. During our review of an old report, we found revelations from declassified CIA research into Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) that offers groundbreaking support for our quantum-focused hypothesis, notably aligning with the strange and pervasive “Hitchhiker Effect.”
CIA’s Secret EVP Research: What Did They Discover?
The CIA’s investigation into EVPs—anomalous voices recorded without any identifiable physical source—was conducted under rigorous scientific conditions. Utilizing electromagnetic shielding (Faraday cages), acoustic isolation chambers, sensitive microphones, and meticulous frequency analyses, their studies repeatedly documented voices exhibiting clear linguistic structure, emotional inflections, and intelligent interaction patterns. Crucially, these voices persisted despite rigorous isolation methods designed explicitly to eliminate fraud, external interference, or equipment malfunction.
These anomalous findings strongly support the existence of genuine phenomena historically classified as “paranormal.” Yet, intriguingly, the CIA never publicly acknowledged these results, leaving behind only quietly archived documents.
Bridging EVP and the Hitchhiker Effect
The CIA’s documented evidence mirrors another phenomenon Fortean Winds extensively investigates: the Hitchhiker Effect. Individuals experiencing close encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) frequently report subsequent paranormal experiences—anomalies seemingly “attached” or entangled with them long after the initial event.
Historical records, from Kenneth Arnold’s seminal UFO sighting to modern encounters at Skinwalker Ranch, demonstrate a consistent pattern. Witnesses experience lasting anomalies, from poltergeist-like disturbances to inexplicable auditory phenomena remarkably similar to EVPs. These subsequent experiences often spread to close associates, behaving almost contagiously, suggesting a deeper connection to quantum entanglement theories.
The Quantum Hypothesis: EVP and Paranormal Contagion
At Fortean Winds, we posit that these phenomena—EVPs and the Hitchhiker Effect alike—arise from quantum-level interactions. Intense paranormal encounters could cause entanglement between individuals and an unknown quantum field, creating lasting links manifesting as subsequent anomalous experiences.
Quantum entanglement, a scientifically recognized phenomenon where particles remain connected regardless of distance, aligns closely with the CIA’s EVP research. The persistence of anomalous voices despite controlled isolation suggests non-local quantum interactions rather than traditional electromagnetic or acoustic phenomena.
Implications: A New Understanding of Paranormal Reality
The alignment between CIA findings, the Hitchhiker Effect, and quantum theory is more than coincidental. It suggests our world might inherently operate with quantum complexity at a macroscopic scale we have yet to fully understand. The CIA’s quiet recognition of these phenomena challenges skepticism, paving the way for scientific inquiry into areas once dismissed as superstition.
The Fortean Call to Action
The question remains open: if the CIA once secretly recognized anomalous phenomena like EVPs, how much more might our reality hold beyond current scientific comprehension? Fortean Winds invites researchers, experiencers, and open-minded skeptics alike to reconsider the boundaries of what’s possible.
By uncovering these quantum echoes, we might just uncover deeper truths about reality itself.
A timeline of the UAP Drone Events beginning in November of 2024.
We compiled a list of locations and major events stemming from the Unidentifed Anomlaous “drones” which began on November 18, 2024.
Timeline and Map Updated 1/9/25
As of this date, we count 29 states affected. Only UAP sightings which matched the descriptions of the objects appearing near New Jersey are being considered for this timeline and map.
International incidents are detailed below the CONUS US incidents. Find them here.
Sightings Across USA as of 1/09/24 – Fortean WindsEast Coast Cluster of Sightings – Google Earth
Note: The Oregon, Tenessee and California sightings have been a lesser degree of intensity of reports than the East Coast Cluster which has a significant number of reports.
Location: Langley Air Force Base, Virginia Incident: Unidentified drones were observed flying over Langley Air Force Base for 17 consecutive days in December 2023. Sightings were consistent, with drones appearing daily at approximately 6 PM. Witnesses described the drones as silent, with bright lights, and flying in coordinated patterns. The activity caused significant concern due to the strategic importance of the base, which houses the Air Combat Command and other critical military operations.
Public Reactions: The prolonged presence of drones over Langley sparked alarm among residents and military personnel. Discussions on social media speculated about espionage or surveillance activities, with many questioning the inability to intercept or identify the operators.
Investigative Updates: The U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense have yet to confirm the origin or purpose of the drones. While radar systems detected the flights, no identifying information has been recovered. Military officials stated that the drones posed no immediate threat to the base’s operations, though the repeated incursions intensified calls for improved counter-drone measures at sensitive installations.
“Despite the deployment of countermeasures, including ‘Dronebusters’—devices designed to intercept and disable unauthorized drones—the objects evaded capture and continued their activities unabated.”
Residents in Morristown, Madison, and Mendham report sightings of large drones with flashing lights hovering silently at low altitudes between 8 PM and 11 PM. Witnesses describe the drones as extremely large and capable of remaining stationary for extended periods.
Some witnesses report three drones flying in formation, while others describe them maneuvering rapidly across the sky.
Public Reactions:
Social media platforms like Nextdoor see a surge in discussions as residents share videos and speculate about the drones being part of a government program.
Investigative Updates:
Local law enforcement acknowledges the reports but finds no evidence of illegal drone activity. FAA monitoring confirms no registered flight plans in the area.
Additional reports come from towns such as Chatham, Parsippany, and Florham Park, describing drones with multicolored lights moving erratically at high altitudes.
Public Reactions:
Residents express growing concerns about potential surveillance, with some calling for local officials to investigate.
Investigative Updates:
The FAA begins investigating the airspace activity but does not detect any registered aircraft or drones during the sightings.
Location: Monmouth and Somerset Counties, New Jersey
Sightings expand into Middletown, Colts Neck, and Bedminster, where drones are described as hovering over residential areas and moving silently between treelines.
Witnesses report drones flying near Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster and over Naval Weapons Station Earle in Monmouth County.
Public Reactions:
Many residents express fear, with some suspecting foreign surveillance. Others suggest the drones may be involved in corporate espionage or mapping activities.
Investigative Updates:
Local law enforcement increases patrols in affected areas. FAA denies any connection to military operations.
Location: Multiple Counties, New Jersey; Bronx and Staten Island, New York; Eastern Pennsylvania
New Jersey: Sightings continue in Bergen, Monmouth, Somerset, and Ocean Counties. Reports describe drones as brightly lit, silent, and capable of hovering for hours.
Bronx, NY: Videos emerge on social media showing a large drone with red and blue lights over residential areas.
Eastern Pennsylvania: Residents in Bucks County report drones flying in formation, often along highways or near power substations.
Public Reactions:
Speculation grows online, with theories ranging from foreign surveillance to advanced corporate technology.
Investigative Updates:
FAA acknowledges the volume of reports but emphasizes that none of the sightings conflict with known air traffic regulations.
FBI opens an investigation into the mysterious drone sightings. Local residents continue to report nightly activity near military installations and highways.
Investigative Updates:
FBI seeks public assistance and asks witnesses to report any unusual activity involving drones. FAA provides radar data but finds no anomalies.
Multiple commercial pilots report seeing colorful lights moving rapidly across the sky. Descriptions include red lights performing erratic maneuvers at extreme speeds.
Public Reactions:
Social media lights up with speculation about UFOs after leaked audio recordings from air traffic controllers surface online.
Investigative Updates:
FAA confirms receiving pilot reports but states that no radar data supports the sightings.
“By Dec. 7, drones had allegedly been spotted in at least eight North and Central Jersey counties including Bergen, Essex, Hunterdon, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Warren counties.”
U.S. Army confirms 11 sightings of large drones over the base. Witnesses describe drones hovering at approximately 500 feet and equipped with multicolored lights.
Public Reactions:
Concerns rise about national security as military facilities are repeatedly overflown by unidentified aircraft.
Investigative Updates:
The Army collaborates with federal agencies to monitor the airspace.
Location: Nebraska (Statewide) Incident: Numerous reports of SUV-sized drones terrorizing towns and livestock across Nebraska. Witnesses described drones moving rapidly at speeds of up to 120 mph, hovering low over fields, and emitting bright lights. Sightings were particularly concentrated in rural areas, with drones operating during late evening and nighttime hours. Public Reactions: Farmers and rural residents expressed alarm over the impact on livestock and the invasive nature of the drones. Speculation ranged from advanced government projects to foreign surveillance programs, heightening public concern. Investigative Updates: Local authorities and federal agencies launched investigations into the sightings. Despite the intensity of reports, no official explanations or responsible parties have been identified. Investigators noted the advanced capabilities of the drones, suggesting sophisticated technology. Source: Daily Mail
December 11–13, 2024
Location: New Jersey, New York, and Maryland
Sightings expand into new regions, including southern Maryland and northern New York. Witnesses describe drones emitting mechanical hums and moving in coordinated patterns.
Incident: Mysterious drones were reported flying over rural areas in Niobrara County, Wyoming. Witnesses described the drones as operating in coordinated patterns, mirroring the behavior of drones reported over New Jersey. The drones were observed at night, flying silently at low altitudes and forming grid-like paths over private lands and ranches.
Public Reactions: Local ranchers and residents expressed concern, noting the invasive nature of the flights and their potential to disturb livestock. Comparisons to the New Jersey sightings fueled speculation about a broader operational pattern or shared origin.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports and began coordinating with federal agencies, including the FAA, to investigate the sightings. Officials noted the similarities to New Jersey drone activity but have not identified the operators or confirmed a specific intent.
Location: Los Angeles, California (Beverly Hills) Incident: Comedian Dane Cook reported a mysterious drone hovering near his property in Los Angeles. The drone emitted scanning-like lights and moved erratically, as captured in a video Cook shared online. He described the moment as “wild,” noting the drone appeared to be observing the property or those within it. Public Reactions: Fans and online followers expressed intrigue and concern about the incident, with many pointing out similarities to other recent drone sightings across the country. Discussions ranged from privacy invasion concerns to speculation about advanced surveillance technologies. Investigative Updates: No official response or investigation into the specific incident has been reported. The sighting adds to the growing narrative of mysterious drone activity across the United States. Source: Wide Open Country
Maryland
Date: December 12, 2024 Location: Residential area near Former Governor Larry Hogan’s home Incident: Reports of dozens of large drones hovering late at night. The drones were visible for an extended period, raising concerns among local residents. Public Reactions: Former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan publicly acknowledged the event on X, expressing frustration at the lack of federal transparency and urging immediate investigation. Investigative Updates: FBI’s Baltimore office confirmed it is aware of drone reports in Maryland and Delaware, though specifics remain unclear. Source: NBC News; Statement by Larry Hogan
New York
Date: Early December 2024 Location: Statewide (specific regions unspecified) Incident: Reports emerged of drone activity in New York, alongside other Northeast sightings. Local witnesses described unidentified aerial devices operating at night, similar to New Jersey events. Public Reactions: Residents expressed confusion and unease over drones appearing with no explanation. Officials have not provided clear updates. Investigative Updates: The FBI has not corroborated electronic evidence for sightings but acknowledges ongoing public concerns. Source: NBC News
Delaware
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Reports of possible drone sightings, particularly noted by the FBI’s Baltimore office. Specific areas of activity have not been disclosed. Public Reactions: Residents and officials are demanding answers regarding the origin and purpose of the drones. Investigative Updates: The FBI is monitoring reports but has stated there is no confirmed evidence of national security threats or restricted airspace violations. Source: NBC News
Florida
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Multiple reports of drone sightings surfaced in Florida, potentially linked to the broader regional activity observed in the Northeast. The nature of the sightings mirrors that of New Jersey and Maryland. Public Reactions: Growing speculation and concern, with Floridians questioning the origins and operators of the devices. Investigative Updates: No official investigations or statements from Florida authorities have been reported. Source: NBC News
Connecticut
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Senator Richard Blumenthal publicly demanded urgent investigations into the unexplained drone sightings. The activity appears consistent with the patterns observed in neighboring states. Public Reactions: Blumenthal’s comments highlight growing bipartisan frustration and a call for transparency at the federal level. Investigative Updates: Federal agencies have not provided substantial updates but claim the drones pose no immediate threat. Source: NBC News
December 12–14, 2024
Middle Tennessee and Southern Kentucky
Locations:
Scotts Hollow, Nashville, TN: A drone has been spotted nightly at 6:50 PM by residents, including Sharon Hoover, who provided photos. The drone was observed over private land, and the owners denied any connection to it.
Tuckers Crossroads, Lebanon, TN: At 5:00 AM on December 12, Belinda Donaldson observed drones flying in a grid-like pattern, moving rapidly and making unusual sharp turns, inconsistent with regular BNA (Nashville International Airport) traffic.
Nortonville, KY: On December 13, Annette Dunlap reported a drone sighting around 9:30 PM, describing the object as “weird” and out of the ordinary. Videos of the drone were provided.
Behaviors Observed:
Consistent nightly activity at specific times.
Grid-like flight patterns and erratic quick directional changes.
Drones operating outside typical flight paths of known local aircraft.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses expressed confusion and concern, particularly due to the recurring nature of sightings and their deviation from typical aerial activity.
Local residents in Nashville noted that the drones appeared in areas where lights had never been seen before in decades.
Investigative Updates:
Metro Nashville Police Department and FAA have received no formal reports regarding these sightings, though the FAA reiterated that drone flights under 400 feet are legal if compliant with their regulations.
The FAA confirmed ongoing monitoring of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) across the United States, particularly in the Northeast, but stated no increase in formal pilot reports had been observed in Tennessee or Kentucky.
FAA continues to collaborate with security partners regarding drone incidents.
Location: Wright Patterson Air Force Base (AFB), Ohio.
Incident:
Multiple drones were spotted flying over Wright Patterson AFB, prompting the closure of its airspace from Friday night through Saturday morning. The base, home to critical Air Force units such as the Air Force Research Lab, National Air and Space Intelligence Center, and 88th Air Base Wing, reported drones of varying sizes and configurations over the installation.
A Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) was issued, warning about “heavy UAS activity” and closing airspace temporarily due to a security threat.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones exhibited resistance to basic detection measures, with their varying configurations indicating a possible reconnaissance-focused operation.
Witnesses noted their ability to hover and maneuver within restricted airspace.
Public Reactions:
Growing public frustration with the lack of clarity from federal agencies. Social media users expressed alarm over repeated incidents at sensitive military facilities.
Investigative Updates:
Air Force spokespersons confirmed that the drones posed no immediate threat to facilities or personnel but failed to identify their origin. Investigations are ongoing, with collaboration between local authorities and federal agencies.
The incident occurred one day after a joint press conference by the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, FAA, and DoD addressing UAP-related concerns.
Location: East Alabama (specific sightings in Anniston and Oxford)
Incident: Residents in East Alabama reported mysterious lights and drones hovering over neighborhoods and rural areas during the late evening. Witnesses described the drones as having bright, blinking lights and flying silently in patterns inconsistent with known aircraft. Some drones hovered low over residential areas, while others moved in formations across the sky.
Public Reactions: Local residents expressed confusion and concern, with some speculating about surveillance or other unknown purposes. The sightings generated significant discussion on social media, with users sharing videos and debating the potential origin of the drones.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement confirmed receiving multiple calls about the sightings. Authorities stated they are working with the FAA to investigate the incidents but have not identified any operators or determined the purpose of the drones.
Incident: Residents across Phoenix reported mysterious drone sightings during the evening hours. Witnesses described the drones as emitting bright lights and moving silently over residential areas and city outskirts. Some reported the drones hovering in place for extended periods before flying off in coordinated patterns.
Public Reactions: The sightings sparked concern among residents, with many speculating about surveillance or experimental technology. Social media buzzed with videos and photos of the drones, leading to discussions about their potential origin and purpose.
Investigative Updates: Local police acknowledged receiving several reports about the drones. The FAA has been notified, and authorities are collaborating to investigate the incidents. As of now, no operators have been identified, and no airspace violations have been reported.
Long Beach, CA: On December 13, 2024, new video shared with FOX 11 showed mysterious drones flying near Long Beach during nighttime hours. Witnesses reported the objects as brightly lit and silent, consistent with other sightings across California.
Temecula, CA: Earlier in the week, video footage captured a large drone flying near Camp Pendleton, raising concerns due to its proximity to the Marine Corps base.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones operated at low altitudes with navigation lights, hovering persistently in specific areas.
The objects displayed characteristics of commercial or surveillance drones, though their purpose remains unknown.
Similarities were noted with drones reported on the East Coast, including their bright lighting configurations and quiet operation.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses emphasized the public’s right to know what is flying in the skies and why.
Republican Congressman Jeff Van Drew reiterated concerns, suggesting that these drones could be tied to a foreign adversary, possibly Iran.
Opinions on the significance of the sightings varied:
Drone experts, such as Steven Katz from Flying Lion, argued the sightings were not threatening, noting drones’ limited capability to gather sensitive information.
Retired pilot Kenneth Wells dismissed concerns about foreign involvement, stating adversarial drones would not be visible with navigation lights.
Investigative Updates:
The FBI continues to investigate these incidents, requesting that residents provide videos, photos, and information related to the drones.
Authorities maintain that there is no evidence these drones pose an immediate threat to public safety or national security.
Separately, a Chinese national was arrested on December 12, 2024, attempting to fly to China after illegally flying a drone over the SpaceX facility in Vandenberg, CA, highlighting broader concerns about drone activity.
Location: Belleville, New Jersey Incident: Multiple drones observed flying in grid patterns over Belleville. Theories link the activity to missing radioactive material in the area. Witnesses describe synchronized movements of the drones during nighttime hours. Public Reactions: Residents express alarm at the connection between the drones and potential radioactive material, fueling widespread speculation. Investigative Updates: Local officials and federal agencies are investigating the connection but have not provided confirmation. Source: NY Post
December 15, 2024
Location: Southern California (Redondo Beach, Pacoima, Riverside, Temecula) Incident: Residents across Southern California reported mysterious drones, with sightings including hovering objects and rapid “moving lights.” Witnesses captured videos and photos of drones over Redondo Beach, San Fernando Gardens in Pacoima, and Riverside. Multiple drones were also observed over Temecula, with footage shared on TikTok. Public Reactions: Local residents expressed alarm and curiosity, with some speculating about potential surveillance or criminal activity. National concerns intensified as similar sightings caused disruptions, including the temporary shutdown of Stewart International Airport in New York. Investigative Updates: Federal officials, including the Department of Defense, confirmed drone activity over two military bases in New Jersey but noted that such incursions are not new. The Pentagon emphasized the need for stronger regulations, calling the activity “irresponsible” and frustrating. Source: KTLA News
December 15, 2024
Location: Northern Vermont and New York Incident: Residents in northern Vermont and parts of New York reported sightings of mysterious drones flying low over rural areas and near residential neighborhoods. Witnesses described the drones as having bright, blinking lights and moving silently in coordinated formations. Some reports indicated drones hovering near agricultural facilities and small airports. Public Reactions: The sightings have sparked curiosity and concern among locals, with many questioning the purpose of the drones and their operators. Speculation includes government surveillance, corporate testing, or unknown operators. Investigative Updates: Local authorities have acknowledged the sightings and are working with federal agencies to determine the drones’ origin. No concrete leads or violations of airspace have been reported. Source: MyNBC5
December 15, 2024
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Incident: Residents in Atlanta reported mysterious drone activity over various neighborhoods during the evening hours. Witnesses described seeing clusters of bright, silent drones flying at low altitudes and performing erratic maneuvers. Some drones hovered above residential areas, while others moved rapidly across the sky, leading to widespread speculation about their origin.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed alarm and curiosity, with many questioning the purpose of the drones and their operators. Speculation ranged from surveillance activities to advanced technology demonstrations. Social media platforms were flooded with videos and eyewitness accounts, with some residents demanding increased transparency from local and federal authorities.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports and stated they are coordinating with federal agencies, including the FAA, to investigate. As of now, no operators have been identified, and authorities have not confirmed any violations of airspace regulations.
Location: Michigan (Statewide) Incident: Reports of mysterious drones emerged across Michigan, with sightings in Detroit, Grand Rapids, and rural areas. Witnesses described clusters of drones hovering silently at night, with some moving in grid-like patterns. Speculation arose about their connection to the national wave of drone sightings. Public Reactions: Public reactions varied, with some expressing concern about potential surveillance or security risks. Others speculated that the sightings were part of a hoax. Social media buzzed with discussions linking the drones to conspiracy theories and technological demonstrations. Investigative Updates: State and local authorities investigated the sightings but found no conclusive evidence of illegal activity. Officials emphasized the potential for misidentification of lawful drone operations and other aerial phenomena. Source: Detroit Free Press (article contains video)
December 13 and 16, 2024
Location: Evansville, Indiana (East Side and Saint Wendel in Posey County) Incident: Multiple reports of drones or unidentified objects over Evansville. The first caller described dozens of bright, darting objects on the East Side near the Newburgh line. The second caller reported photos of approximately seven crafts his daughter captured near Saint Wendel. Witnesses noted erratic movements but lacked physical descriptions. Public Reactions: While some residents expressed alarm, others reacted lightheartedly, joking about the sightings. Social media posts, including a video claiming drones were spotted over the Ozarks, fueled speculation but offered no clear explanations. Investigative Updates: Local authorities did not confirm sightings. The FAA provided a general statement emphasizing the legality of drones under 400 feet and noted past cases of mistaken identity involving manned aircraft. The Evansville Regional Airport and FAA reported no known issues in the area. Source: Evansville Courier & Press
December 15–16, 2024
Location: Utah (West Haven, Roy, Mapleton, Spanish Fork) Incident: Numerous drones reported flying across multiple locations in Utah, including near Hill Air Force Base. Witnesses observed clusters of drones, with some hovering low over vehicles. A mother and daughter captured images of the drones, describing them as large and bright, sparking fears of unknown intent. Additional sightings occurred over Mapleton and Spanish Fork, where seven drones were observed moving in coordinated patterns. Public Reactions: Local residents expressed alarm and confusion. Concerns over privacy and potential threats were heightened, particularly near Hill Air Force Base. Speculation from experts suggested a mix of legitimate drone activity and heightened awareness feeding the reports. Investigative Updates: Hill AFB officials confirmed drones in the vicinity but stated that operations were not impacted. Authorities are monitoring airspace and collaborating with local law enforcement to track and identify unmanned aerial systems. Source: KSL TV
December 11–17, 2024
Twin Cities, Minnesota
Locations:
Roseville, MN: On December 11, 2024, Chelsie Jolley observed and recorded six bright orbs hovering in the sky near her home.
St. Paul, MN: On December 13, 2024, during rush hour, Micah Zawistowski reported a car-sized craft hovering just 30 feet above the Lafayette Bridge, shining its lights on passing vehicles.
White Bear Lake and Arden Hills, MN: Additional drone activity was reported, with Zawistowski capturing footage of drones hovering near neighborhoods.
Blaine, MN: Zawistowski described being followed by a car-sized drone near the Blaine airport.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones hovered persistently at low altitudes, including over bridges and neighborhoods.
Some drones were described as shining lights on individuals or vehicles, raising concerns about surveillance.
Reports indicated silent operation, with multiple drones appearing in clusters or formations.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses expressed a mix of curiosity and unease, with some speculating about surveillance or other unknown purposes.
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar called for a formal Senate briefing to address the rising drone activity and growing public concerns.
Local residents acknowledged the positive uses of drones, such as for search and rescue missions, but questioned their purpose in these unexplained incidents.
Investigative Updates:
No official explanations have been provided for the sightings. FAA regulations continue to permit drone activity under specific conditions, but concerns persist about low-altitude incursions and potential privacy violations.
Location: White Settlement, Texas (Near NAS Joint Reserve Base and Lockheed Martin Facilities) Incident: Unidentified drones observed flying approximately 100 feet in the air near high-profile military sites. Witnesses, including federal law enforcement and residents, reported seeing drones in clusters of six, pairs, or trios. The activity continued for two hours during the evening. Public Reactions: Local residents and officials expressed heightened concern due to the national narrative around drones and security risks. White Settlement Police Chief Chris Cook noted the public’s awareness following similar Northeast sightings. Investigative Updates: Federal agencies are actively monitoring the reports. Advanced detection technology and trained visual observers have been deployed by the Biden administration to investigate. Officials have stated that sightings likely involve a mix of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement operations, with no confirmed national security threats. Source: Austin American-Statesman
December 17, 2024
Location: Colorado (Statewide) Incident: Residents across Colorado reported mysterious drones flying near homes and neighborhoods. Witnesses described the drones as large, brightly lit, and silent, often hovering for extended periods before performing erratic maneuvers. Sightings were concentrated in suburban and rural areas. Public Reactions: Many residents expressed unease, citing privacy concerns and the unusual behavior of the drones. Social media discussions speculated about their purpose, ranging from advanced surveillance to recreational use by unidentified operators. Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports but did not confirm the origins of the drones. Federal agencies were notified, and investigations into their activity are ongoing. No violations of airspace regulations were reported. Source: KDVR
December 18, 2024
Location: Tacoma, Washington Incident: Residents of Tacoma reported multiple mysterious drones flying over neighborhoods and near industrial areas. Witnesses described the drones as emitting bright lights and moving in coordinated patterns, with some flying low enough to clearly distinguish their shapes. The drones reportedly hovered for extended periods before moving on. Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease about the drones’ presence, questioning their purpose and origin. Some speculated about surveillance or mapping activities, while others raised concerns about privacy and safety. Investigative Updates: Local authorities acknowledged the reports and confirmed that they are coordinating with federal agencies to investigate the sightings. No operators or organizations have been identified, and no restricted airspace violations have been reported. Source: AOL News
December 21, 2024
Location: Metro East, Illinois
Incident: An Illinois resident recorded strange lights in the skies above the Metro East region during the late evening hours. The lights were described as bright, erratic, and appearing in clusters. Witnesses noted the lights moved silently and seemed to hover in place intermittently before rapidly changing positions.
Public Reactions: Local residents expressed curiosity and concern about the unexplained lights. Many speculated whether the lights were drones, advanced technology, or another aerial phenomenon. Social media saw an influx of shared videos and theories about the sightings.
Investigative Updates: Local authorities and the FAA were alerted to the reports but have not identified the source of the lights. Officials stated there were no scheduled or authorized drone activities in the area during the time of the sightings.
Incident: A mysterious drone was captured on video flying over Manassas, Virginia, during the late evening hours. Witnesses reported the drone as large, with bright, flashing lights, hovering over residential neighborhoods before moving swiftly towards a nearby wooded area. The drone emitted no sound and displayed erratic flight patterns inconsistent with conventional aircraft.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed alarm on social media, with many speculating about surveillance or experimental technology. Local authorities received several calls reporting the incident, heightening community concern.
Investigative Updates: Manassas police confirmed receiving reports and stated that they were working with the FAA to investigate. As of now, no operators have been identified, and authorities continue to monitor the airspace for further activity.
Location: Western Arkansas and Surrounding States, USA
Incident: Mysterious drones were reported flying over parts of western Arkansas, following similar sightings across neighboring states. Witnesses observed large drones operating in groups, often flying in grid-like patterns during the nighttime hours. Several reports described the drones as having bright, multicolored lights and silent operation.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease and frustration, with many questioning the lack of transparency regarding the sightings. Local social media platforms were inundated with videos and eyewitness accounts, sparking speculation about the drones’ purpose and operators.
Investigative Updates: The Arkansas Department of Emergency Management stated that they were monitoring the situation closely and coordinating with federal agencies. Despite significant public interest, no operators have been identified, and authorities have not released additional information regarding the drones’ origin or intent.
In addition to the previously mentioned sightings in Arkansas, there have been reports of mysterious drone activities in neighboring states, including Missouri and Oklahoma.
Missouri: Residents near the Arkansas-Missouri border, particularly in the Ozark region, have reported clusters of 20-30 drones flying over properties. These drones were observed operating in groups during nighttime hours.
Oklahoma: Similar drone sightings have been reported in Oklahoma, with residents observing large drones flying in coordinated patterns over rural areas.
These incidents have raised concerns among residents and local authorities, prompting investigations to determine the origin and purpose of these drone activities.
International Incidents Related to Similar UAP Sightings
Late November 2024
United Kingdom
Locations: Military bases across England, including locations near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Brize Norton.
Incident: Multiple sightings of drones over UK military installations, flying in coordinated patterns indicative of reconnaissance or surveillance. Witnesses report drones hovering at low altitudes and moving in systematic grid-like paths.
Behaviors Observed:
Persistent hovering above critical installations.
Nighttime activity, with bright flashing lights similar to the New Jersey incidents.
Evasive maneuvers when approached by aircraft or ground personnel.
Public Reactions:
Public discourse centers on national security and concerns over breaches of restricted airspace.
Media outlets question whether the sightings are linked to advanced technologies or foreign adversaries.
Investigative Updates:
The UK’s Ministry of Defence acknowledges the sightings but denies any connection to known military exercises.
Local police forces coordinate with military officials, focusing on radar data and eyewitness reports.
Location: Ramstein Air Base, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, and nearby industrial sites.
Incident:
German authorities reported multiple unidentified drones flying over the US military base at Ramstein and other critical facilities in the area. Reports included sightings over facilities belonging to Rheinmetall, a major German arms manufacturer, and earlier sightings in Brunsbüttel, Schleswig-Holstein.
The drones were spotted late at night, with multiple instances registered over several days.
Behaviors Observed:
Hovering above military sites.
Evasive flight paths that avoided detection.
Possible links to espionage, although investigations have yet to confirm such activity.
Public Reactions:
Concerns rose among local residents and security experts about the potential for Russian espionage or testing of advanced surveillance technologies.
The incident gained significant media attention, prompting discussions about drone countermeasures at military and industrial sites.
Investigative Updates:
German authorities and the US Air Force stated that the drones did not disrupt operations or pose immediate threats to facilities or residents.
Officials are continuing to monitor airspace with host nation authorities to ensure security and gather intelligence on the origin of the drones.
Previous sightings in August over Brunsbüttel, believed to be part of a Russian espionage campaign, are now being re-evaluated in light of these incidents.
Russia, Kazakhstan, China, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Locations:
Russia: Military installations in Siberia.
Kazakhstan: Baikonur Cosmodrome.
China: Coastal regions near Shanghai and Guangzhou.
Japan: Proximity to U.S. military bases in Okinawa.
Southeast Asia: Reports from Thailand and the Philippines.
Incident:
A significant increase in UAP and drone sightings across these regions.
In one notable case, a drone was reported hovering over HMS Queen Elizabeth (a Royal Navy aircraft carrier operating near East Asia), resisting electronic jamming attempts.
Behaviors Observed:
High-speed maneuvers and erratic flight paths.
Resistance to jamming and anti-drone measures, suggesting advanced electronic systems.
Hovering near key military and infrastructural assets.
Public Reactions:
Discussions on security forums speculate about espionage or testing of cutting-edge aerial technologies.
Theories range from foreign adversaries to corporate surveillance programs.
Investigative Updates:
Minimal official commentary from nations involved.
Security analysts note a sharp increase in aerial surveillance awareness, with counter-drone measures being reevaluated.
Date: December 22, 2024 Location: Jutland Peninsula, Denmark
Incident: Danish police reported multiple sightings of unidentified drones flying over critical infrastructure on the Jutland Peninsula. Witnesses described the drones as large and silent, often appearing during the late evening hours. The drones were sighted near energy facilities and railways, raising concerns about potential surveillance or sabotage attempts.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease, with some fearing espionage or cyber-attacks. The Danish government faced calls for transparency and stricter drone regulations to ensure national security.
Investigative Updates: Police have initiated an investigation into the sightings, coordinating with military and intelligence agencies. No operators have been identified, and authorities are using advanced radar systems to monitor further activity. The drones’ origin and purpose remain unclear.
Incident: Multiple unidentified drones triggered airspace shutdowns across Denmark. Copenhagen Airport halted operations for ~4 hours. Drones were described as large, silent, and unregistered. Military bases were also reportedly targeted. Authorities confirmed multiple detections but no attribution.
Notable Behaviors:
Silent drone incursions
Hovering near critical civilian and military infrastructure
Lack of radar signatures
Unidentified operator despite active investigation
Connection: Behavior mirrors NJ and Langley cases — advanced, silent, low-visibility craft near strategic sites.
Incident: Drones were spotted hovering over a power plant, a hospital, and a shipyard in the region. The drones had no visible propulsion, emitted no sound, and remained stationary for extended periods. German authorities were unable to identify the source.
Notable Behaviors:
Low-speed hovering
Unregistered with German aviation authorities
No visual or acoustic signature consistent with known drones
Overflight of infrastructure, not military targets
Incident: Witnesses reported ~15 drones hovering in a grid pattern over Elsenborn base. The drones were silent, highly luminous, and departed before air response could intercept. Belgian military authorities have no attribution or origin. Radar was inconclusive.
Notable Behaviors:
Hovering in military airspace
Grid-like formation
No transponder or emissions detected
Authorities confirmed unauthorized intrusion with no attribution
Sources: Le Monde, La Libre Belgique
Classification: 🟡 Tier 1 – Military Airspace Anomalous Drone Event (Note: Monitoring needed; attribution still officially unknown)
October 3–4, 2025
📍 Munich, Germany (Franz Josef Strauss Airport)
Incident: Munich Airport experienced two complete shutdowns within 24 hours after sightings of unidentified drones. Ground crews and pilots reported bright, hovering objects over runways. German Federal Police were unable to locate or track any drone via radar or line of sight.
Notable Behaviors:
Airport operations disrupted twice
Hovering craft observed without visual origin
ATC and security systems failed to track
No legal drone flights permitted in airspace
Sources: AP News, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Bavarian Interior Ministry
We analyze the historical data around the recent UFO sightings in the New Jersey.
Abstract
Recent drone-like sightings reported in New Jersey since November 18, 2024, have raised concerns among residents and authorities. This study analyzes historical and current UAP data to provide actionable insights for investigators. Using data from the NUFORC database, geospatial and temporal trends were examined, focusing on sensitive sites such as Picatinny Arsenal, Naval Weapons Station Earle, and other high-activity regions. This analysis seeks to discern patterns, identify anomalies, and offer a foundation for future research.
A map of New Jersey with blue markers indicating the top 10% of spatial clusters of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) sightings
1. Introduction
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings in New Jersey have a long history. While many can be attributed to natural or human-made causes, others defy explanation. Following a surge of reports in New Jersey identified as potential “unidentified drones,” it is imperative to analyze historical UAP activity to better understand these phenomena and their implications.
The current analysis focuses on:
Historical UAP activity across New Jersey.
Specific high-activity areas linked to recent reports.
Insights into temporal and geospatial patterns.
2. Methodology
This study utilized data from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), which cataloged UAP sightings until 2023. Sightings were filtered for New Jersey and analyzed across the following dimensions:
Temporal Analysis: Identifying trends by month and hour.
Geospatial Analysis: Mapping sightings relative to sensitive areas.
UAP Characteristics: Examining shapes, durations, and descriptions.
Distances to key sites, such as Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle, were calculated using geospatial methods, and statistical tools were employed to detect patterns and anomalies.
Monthly UAP Sightings in New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
3. Results
3.1 Temporal Patterns
Monthly Trends: Sightings are distributed year-round, with noticeable peaks in warmer months, likely due to improved visibility and increased outdoor activity.
Hourly Trends: A significant proportion of sightings occur at night, aligning with the descriptions of light-emitting UAPs.
UAP Sightings Heatmap – New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
Note: The large yellow mass shows an unusual intensity around Brick, New Jersey. Which is 30 miles East of McGuire Air Force Base, but is not in the standard flight path of vehicles going in and out of the base.
3.2 Geospatial Analysis
UAP Frequency around NJ Sensitive Locations (Fortean Winds, 2024)
Hotspots: The region around Brick, NJ, exhibited the highest density of UAP reports. Other areas of interest included:
Picatinny Arsenal (1 mile proximity to sightings)
Naval Weapons Station Earle (2 miles proximity)
Trump National Golf Club Bedminster (2.5 miles proximity)
Raritan River Corridor (1.5 miles proximity)
These proximities suggest potential links to strategic locations.
Reported UAP Shapes In New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
3.3 UAP Characteristics
Commonly reported shapes include “Light,” “Circle,” and “Triangle.”
Sightings range from brief appearances (5 seconds) to prolonged encounters (several minutes or recurring nightly phenomena).
Behaviors such as hovering, rapid directional changes, and silent operation were frequently noted.
3.4 Anomalies
Certain cases report features inconsistent with known drone or aircraft behaviors, such as speeds exceeding conventional limits or erratic motion patterns.
4. Discussion
The clustering of UAP sightings near sensitive military and strategic sites raises important questions about potential surveillance, testing, or other activities. While many sightings can be attributed to drones, a subset exhibits characteristics that warrant further investigation.
Key findings include:
Persistent hotspots in areas like Brick, NJ (near McGuire AFB), suggest recurring UAP activity unrelated to seasonal variations. Hotspots are identified in the table in the appendix.
Temporal clustering at night aligns with the use of light-emitting drones or unknown aerial technologies.
Proximity to strategic sites highlights the need for enhanced monitoring and airspace management.
Heatmap of UAP Sightings Locations in New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
5. Recommendations
Enhanced Monitoring: Deploy real-time monitoring systems in hotspot areas.
Public Reporting Campaign: Encourage standardized public reporting to improve data quality.
Scientific Collaboration: Involve aerospace experts to evaluate anomalies.
Policy Development: Establish protocols for investigating UAP near sensitive sites.
Instrumentation Reports: Utilize infra-red and thermal cameras to obtain images and display the images to public where analysts can gain further insights.
UAP display characteristic behavior when viewed by thermal cameras (lack of heat signature). This data point would exclude most drones.
A lack of heat signature would be one indication we are dealing with UAP. Another would be the electromagentic field effects demonstrated by the craft.
This can be obtained by law enforcement through the use of readily available SDR or a dedicated device. Report the following for further analysis.
Frequency Sweep: Scan across a range of frequencies to identify active signals.
Signal Detection: Detect and decode various types of signals (e.g., AM, FM, digital).
Spectrum Analysis: Visualize the power distribution across different frequencies.
Signal Decoding: Decode specific signals to extract information.
6. Conclusion
This analysis underscores the complexity of UAP phenomena in New Jersey, blending plausible explanations with cases that defy conventional reasoning. By combining historical and recent data, this study provides a framework for investigators to assess and respond to UAP activity systematically.
Appendix:
Additional Data Relevant to the Analysis and the Area
The article advocates for a dual-approach in researching Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and paranormal events, blending traditional scientific methods with intelligence analysis. It highlights the limitations of conventional science in addressing these elusive phenomena and proposes integrating interdisciplinary insights and innovative methodologies to foster a comprehensive understanding of such occurrences.
The field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and paranormal research has gained significant attention, spurred by numerous credible reports and government acknowledgments of the phenomena.
However, the scientific community remains largely skeptical and constrained by methodologies that may not fully address the unique nature of these occurrences. This article proposes that UAP and paranormal research should diverge from mainstream science, adopting a dual-approach: one rooted in traditional scientific methods and the other in intelligence analysis.
The Limitations of Traditional Scientific Methods
Mainstream science relies heavily on the scientific method, which demands observable, measurable, and repeatable data. This approach has undoubtedly been the bedrock of technological and scientific advancement, providing a structured pathway to understanding the natural world. However, when it comes to UAP and paranormal phenomena, this method encounters significant limitations:
Elusive Nature of the Phenomena: UAPs often appear and disappear rapidly, leaving little to no physical evidence. Paranormal activities, too, are notoriously transient and subjective, often defying conventional measurement.
Technological Superiority: If the intelligence behind UAPs is indeed technologically advanced, it could easily evade our current detection and measurement capabilities, rendering traditional scientific tools ineffective.
Lack of Physical Samples: The absence of tangible artifacts or consistent physical evidence poses a significant barrier to traditional scientific investigation, which depends on the analysis of such samples.
Given these constraints, it is imperative to consider an alternative approach that can complement traditional scientific efforts without being hindered by their limitations.
Intelligence Analysis: A Complementary Approach
The field of intelligence analysis, traditionally used in military and security contexts, offers a promising complementary approach to UAP and paranormal research. This method focuses on collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to understand capabilities, features, and intentions, even in the absence of direct physical evidence.
Data Collection and Correlation: Intelligence analysis relies on collecting various forms of data, including eyewitness accounts, radar logs, satellite imagery, and other indirect evidence. By correlating these diverse sources, researchers can identify patterns and anomalies that might not be apparent through conventional scientific methods.
Behavioral Analysis: Understanding the behavior and patterns of UAPs can provide insights into their capabilities and possible intentions. This approach mirrors techniques used in intelligence to anticipate the actions of adversaries based on observed behavior.
Predictive Modeling: By developing models based on historical data and observed patterns, intelligence analysis can help predict future occurrences and potentially guide where and how to focus observational efforts.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Integrating insights from various fields such as psychology, sociology, and even folklore can enrich the analysis, providing a broader understanding of the phenomena beyond just the physical aspects.
The Path Forward: Integrating Science and Intelligence Analysis
While traditional scientific research remains crucial, it is clear that a new branch dedicated to intelligence analysis is necessary to advance our understanding of UAP and paranormal phenomena. This dual-approach ensures that we are not limited by the constraints of our current scientific paradigms but are also not abandoning the rigorous standards of evidence that science demands.
Establishing Research Frameworks: Developing structured methodologies for intelligence analysis in UAP research will provide a framework for systematic investigation, similar to how the scientific method structures traditional research.
Training and Education: Academics and researchers should be trained in intelligence analysis techniques, fostering a new generation of researchers who can bridge the gap between science and intelligence analysis.
Institutional Support: Universities, research institutions, and government agencies need to recognize and support this dual-approach, allocating resources and funding to both scientific and intelligence analysis efforts.
Public Engagement: Transparency and communication with the public are essential to maintain trust and support for research efforts. Engaging with the public through open forums, publications, and media can help demystify the phenomena and the research process.
In conclusion, the unique and often elusive nature of UAP and paranormal phenomena necessitates a bifurcated research approach. By combining traditional scientific methods with intelligence analysis, we can create a robust framework capable of tackling the complexities of these phenomena, ultimately leading to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding. This dual-approach not only respects the rigor of science but also embraces the innovative and adaptive strategies of intelligence analysis, paving the way for breakthroughs in one of the most intriguing fields of modern research.
The article discusses the potential link between the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and increased Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) activity in South America. It highlights ancient tunnels connecting locations like Nazca and Colares, suggesting a relationship between these tunnels and UAP sightings. The SAA’s unique radiation levels may attract UAPs, necessitating further research.
Update: 7/27/2024
We’ve been playing around with mapping ancient tunnel systems (they seem related)…and this article might be mildly wrong. The South American Anomaly might not be the main reason these beings are appearing in this location. Perhaps it’s part of it, but there is a very solid connection in this region between high intensity UAP activity and the ancient tunnels of Peru. As proof we’d submit the following:
Map of known ancient tunnels around the world – Fortean WindsMap of Ancient South American Tunnel System – Fortean Winds
We weren’t looking for this connection when we noticed it, so that made it all the more shocking. These regions are well known for intense and hostile UAP activity, and they’re all connected by these tunnels.
Tunnels the Peruvian Government sealed up.
Be great to know more…We’ll dig into this some and get back to you…
Introduction
The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) has long been a topic of interest among geophysicists and space scientists due to its unique position where the Earth’s inner Van Allen radiation belt comes closest to the surface. This results in an area with higher-than-normal levels of ionizing radiation. Our research suggests that this anomaly might be linked to increased Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) activity in regions like Peru and Nazca. This article explores this connection, highlighting historical and recent UAP encounters and examining the potential reasons behind this correlation.
The South Atlantic Anomaly: A Brief Overview
The SAA is a region centered off the coast of South America where the Earth’s magnetic field is weaker, allowing more energetic particles from the Sun to penetrate the atmosphere. This results in increased levels of ionizing radiation, which affects satellites, space missions, and even terrestrial electronics.
Historical and Modern UAP Sightings in South America
The Nazca Lines and Peru:
The Nazca Lines, ancient geoglyphs located in southern Peru, have been the center of speculation regarding extraterrestrial activity. These massive designs, visible only from the air, have sparked theories about ancient astronauts and extraterrestrial influence.
Modern reports of UAPs in Peru describe unexplained lights and objects performing extraordinary maneuvers in the sky. These sightings are often reported by locals and have been documented by both amateur and professional researchers.
Brazil and the Colares Incident:
The Colares incident in 1977 is one of the most well-documented UAP encounters in Brazil. Residents of Colares Island reported being attacked by beams of light from UAPs, which caused burns, puncture wounds, and other injuries. These incidents were investigated by the Brazilian Air Force under Operation Prato.
Recent sightings in Brazil continue to report similar phenomena, with lights and objects appearing in the sky and displaying behaviors that defy conventional explanations.
Iquitos Sightings: Local residents in Iquitos, Peru have reported numerous UAP sightings. These include physical attacks, strange hovering objects, and Non-Human encounters. The frequency and nature of these sightings suggest a pattern that correlates with the SAA’s influence.
The Van Allen belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, primarily electrons and protons, that are captured by Earth’s magnetic field. There are two main belts: the inner and the outer Van Allen belts. The inner belt extends from about 1,000 to 12,000 kilometers above Earth’s surface and contains high concentrations of protons with energies exceeding 100 MeV. The outer belt extends from about 13,500 to 58,000 kilometers and primarily contains electrons with energies ranging from 0.1 to 10 MeV. These belts are shaped by Earth’s magnetic field and play a crucial role in protecting the planet from solar wind and cosmic radiation, but they can pose hazards to satellites and astronauts due to the high radiation levels.
Connecting the South Atlantic Anomaly to UAP Activity
The hypothesis that the SAA could be influencing UAP activity in South America is grounded in several observations:
Increased Radiation Levels: The SAA’s high levels of ionizing radiation might be attracting UAPs, similar to how they are often reported near nuclear sites and areas with higher radioactivity.
Geographical Correlation: The areas with the highest reported UAP activities, such as Peru and Brazil, fall within or near the boundaries of the SAA.
Supporting Evidence
Scientific Research: Studies on the SAA have highlighted the increased radiation levels in this region and its effects on satellites and space missions. For instance, the increased flux of energetic particles in the SAA has been shown to cause significant interference with spacecraft electronics (Ancient Pages) (Thoughtnova).
Historical Accounts: A review of historical UAP reports shows a higher incidence of sightings and encounters in regions affected by the SAA. These include well-documented cases like the Colares incident and numerous modern-day reports from areas like the Nazca region (ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGY –) (ANN | Archaeology news network).
Conclusion
The correlation between the South Atlantic Anomaly and heightened UAP activity in South America presents a compelling case for further study. The combination of historical evidence, scientific data, and modern reports suggests that the SAA’s unique characteristics may play a role in attracting UAPs to this region. Further interdisciplinary research could provide more insights into this intriguing connection, potentially uncovering new dimensions of both UAP phenomena and geophysical anomalies.
The exploration of UAP phenomena leads to questions about consciousness, suggesting that these entities possess advanced capabilities, including telepathy and time manipulation. The need for interdisciplinary research is emphasized, correlating psychological, environmental, and quantum theories while proposing a framework to understand possible interactions between humans and Ultra-terrestrials.
If you’ve been following our UAP podcast and website, you’ve been following a standard UFO research journey. You start with trying to determine if flying saucers are real. Once you’ve figured out they are real, you move onto what they are…that takes some twists and turns but it lands you somewhere in the realm of consciousness studies.
We don’t know what consciousness is. I don’t mean just us at Fortean Winds don’t know what consciousness is…humans don’t know what consciousness is.
So, being the material generation, we pretend like it doesn’t exist or relegate it to the fringes of hippy pseudoscience. Which works until it doesn’t…when we’re confronted with the reality of consciousness and its potential effects on our everyday lives, we can either dive into what science exists or dismiss it as Woo (fluff, wild theory).
Yet, these NHI and this phenomenon seem to have a greater control and understanding of consciousness than we do. If nothing else, that tells us there is so much there we have yet to discover…
If discovery is not sufficient motivation, how about survival? These beings have utilized their understanding of consciousness to control minds (see Chris Bledsoe, Fatima). They can freeze people in place, or send them on a journey to another world akin to our own but filled with fantastic creatures and unique differences (see the “Oz Effect and Hitchhiker Effect”).
Whether or not these experiences actually transport the person to another physical realm, or the experience is simulated, is unclear.
What is clear is that the NHI have this capability.
It’s intimidating to consider the fact these beings could be listening to your thoughts…all the time. Do they?
We doubt it. We have to accept they could potentially read thoughts, as we have evidence of numerous credible cases in which these beings communicate telepathically. Yet, why would they want to hear my thoughts about the latest Taylor Swift album? Seems like a waste of time (I didn’t get it).
At Fortean Winds we classify these NHI as “Ultra-terrestrials” because they live here (on planet earth) often enough to be considered terrestrial. And the “Ultra” refers to their capabilities. Not their point of origin. We’ve seen credible cases where these beings…
Can see back and forth in time
Pilot and control technology far beyond ours
Transport people into a land like Oz (apparently another reality)
Materialize and dematerialize matter
Read thoughts and communicate telepathically
Create potergeist-like activity
Appear as religious apparitions and strange monsters
Move through water and earth as if it were air (transmedium)
Transform shape (including mirroring humans)
Interact with humans on a purely psychic level…
Those are facts. We’ve seen these capabilities repeated in credible cases, reported by reliable observers and sometimes including material evidence.
We won’t spend a lot of time on this. The research community appears to be coming around to this set of facts. Good. They have to be accepted in order to be studied.
But then what…if these beings have just about every capability we can imagine, how do we go about studying them?
There is a temptation to just throw up your hands and consider them all powerful, mostly ambivalent and ignore them, or some may be tempted to worship them.
We would argue that neither of those solutions are terribly fruitful.
Instead the next logical steps are:
1) Open study and transparent information sharing of UAP discoveries
2) Attempt open and transparent communication with the NHI.
It doesn’t seem logical to us to worship something which does not make its motives clear. It also doesn’t make sense to ignore something so powerful and potentially informative…that is here…and interacts with us.
Given the confusing and disparate nature of this phenomenon and its capabilities, it seems the only way to get to the truth…is to ask. Communication is the logical next step.
We should accept that this is a multi-faceted phenomenon, which does not make itself known. In fact, it goes out of its way to hide its existence.
The fact that this phenomenon involves material craft and bodies, which are being studied, moves it out of the hippy pseudoscience category and into the WTF category?
If these things are real then all the capabilities they display are possible…and what does that say about our material reality? About our material science?
It says that it’s incomplete. But we already know that, don’t we? When did we decide we had it all figured out?
So, why can’t we ask the all-important questions? The ones that take us out of the realm of new age philosophy and into discovery.
Such as, how can something be both objective and subjective? Both material and immaterial? And why are there so many disparate pieces to this phenomenon?
This question touches on a fundamental and intriguing aspect of the phenomenon involving UAPs, abductions, cryptid sightings, and religious experiences: why do these phenomena sometimes manifest physically and other times psychically or para-physically? Here are some frameworks which attempt to explain these phenomena:
1. Jungian Theory and the Collective Unconscious:
Archetypes and Manifestations: Jung proposed that archetypes from the collective unconscious can manifest in various forms, reflecting both personal and collective human experiences. These archetypes might manifest as physical entities or experiences under certain conditions, especially when collective societal or personal psychological states are conducive.
Symbolic Representation: Physical sightings and psychic experiences could be different ways in which the unconscious mind externalizes internal conflicts, fears, or hopes. The physical manifestations could be a way for the psyche to confront and process these archetypes tangibly, while psychic experiences might represent a more internalized, introspective process. While Jung’s theories may be informative to the phenomenon as a whole (we think so), it can’t be the entirety of it, as there are ships and bodies. Can humans manifest ships and bodies which are sentient through their collective unconscious? Seems unlikely, but it may be that the phenomenon chooses its forms and is otherwise informed by Jungian theory.
Interdimensional Hypotheses: The idea that these phenomena might originate from other dimensions can explain their variable manifestations. Entities or objects could be crossing over from different realities, sometimes interacting with our physical world and other times influencing our minds more subtly. Check out our article on Tesla and Einstein for some quantum hypothesizing.
3. Consciousness and Perception:
Observer Effect: In quantum physics, the observer effect suggests that the act of observation can influence the state of a particle. Similarly, the state of the observer’s consciousness could influence whether an experience is physical or psychic. The expectation, belief, and mental state of the observer might shape how the phenomenon manifests.
Psychosocial Context: The cultural and social context can also influence the form these phenomena take. In societies with a strong belief in physical cryptids, sightings might be more common. Conversely, in cultures with a focus on spiritual or psychic experiences, these might be more prevalent. Combining Jungian theory with quantum physics where the expectations of the observer inform the observed…and we may have something.
4. Parapsychological Perspectives:
PK (Psychokinesis): Some parapsychologists suggest that psychokinetic abilities might enable individuals to manifest physical phenomena through psychic means. This theory posits that the mind can influence physical reality, leading to tangible manifestations of what might otherwise be considered purely psychological phenomena.
Collective Energy: The collective energy of a group or society, particularly in times of stress or significant change, could potentially trigger both physical and psychic manifestations. This might explain why certain periods and locations are hotspots for UAP sightings, cryptid reports, and spiritual experiences. Paranormal researchers often discuss liminal (places in a state of change) states as a precursor to a paranormal experience. Sites such as hospitals, schools and transportation hubs often report activity.
5. Environmental and Electromagnetic Factors:
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF): High levels of electromagnetic fields are often reported in areas with frequent UAP sightings and paranormal activity. EMFs can affect human perception and consciousness, potentially inducing both physical and psychic experiences.
Geophysical Anomalies: Certain geographic locations with unique magnetic or gravitational properties might act as focal points for these phenomena, facilitating both physical appearances and psychic experiences depending on the environmental conditions. These geophysical regions may be influenced by temporal factors and the observer.
The variability in the manifestation of these phenomena—sometimes physical, sometimes psychic—likely involves a complex interplay of psychological, environmental, and possibly quantum factors. Jungian theory provides a valuable framework for understanding the symbolic and archetypal dimensions of these experiences, while quantum and parapsychological theories offer insights into the mechanisms that might allow for such diverse manifestations.
Were you expecting an easy answer? Well, we have a simplified version, that we think holds up for now, and could then be expanded based on more data.
The Fortean Winds: Integrative UAP Hypothesis
Our research framework, which considers the interplay of the right person, place, and time, aligns well with the multidimensional nature of UAPs and related phenomena. This integrative approach can potentially offer a more comprehensive understanding of these elusive experiences. In short, this is how we think it(the phenomenon, NHI, whatever) works…
1. The Right Person:
Sensitivity and Connection: Some individuals appear to have a heightened sensitivity or a particular connection to these phenomena, which might be due to innate psychic abilities, previous experiences, or even genetic factors. Studies have suggested that certain people are more prone to experiencing paranormal phenomena, possibly due to their cognitive or perceptual traits.
Psychological and Emotional State: The mental and emotional state of the individual can influence their susceptibility to these experiences. Stress, trauma, and heightened emotional states are often reported in conjunction with sightings and encounters.
2. The Right Place:
Geophysical Anomalies: Locations with unique geophysical properties, such as high levels of EMF, geomagnetic anomalies, or specific mineral compositions, are often hotspots for paranormal activity and UAP sightings. Skinwalker Ranch in Utah is a notable example, known for its diverse range of unexplained phenomena, potentially linked to its unique geological features.
Historical and Cultural Significance: Certain places with rich histories of paranormal or spiritual activity might act as focal points. These areas could be imbued with cultural and symbolic significance, which might enhance their propensity for such phenomena.
3. The Right Time:
Temporal Factors: Time-related factors, such as specific times of the year (e.g., solstices, equinoxes), lunar cycles, and even certain hours of the day, might play a role in the manifestation of these phenomena. Some researchers suggest that these times could align with natural cycles that amplify environmental energies (livescience.com).
Cosmic and Astrological Influences: Cosmic events, such as solar flares, planetary alignments, and meteor showers, might also influence the occurrence of these phenomena. The idea is that these events can create fluctuations in the Earth’s electromagnetic field, potentially making it easier for interdimensional interactions or psychic phenomena to occur.
Case Studies and Examples:
Skinwalker Ranch:This site is known for a wide array of paranormal phenomena, including UAP sightings, cryptid encounters, and unexplained physical effects. Researchers have noted the presence of unusual magnetic and gravitational anomalies in the area, suggesting a link between the physical environment and the observed phenomena.
Hudson Valley Sightings: In the 1980s, the Hudson Valley in New York became a hotspot for UAP sightings. Many witnesses reported experiencing both physical sightings of craft and psychic phenomena, suggesting a combined influence of geophysical and psychological factors.
The Integrative Hypothesis:
The convergence of these factors can be viewed through an integrative hypothesis:
The Individual: People with certain sensitivities, previous experiences, family history, genetics and/or psychological predispositions may act as catalysts for these experiences.
The Environment: Geophysical anomalies and specific locations may provide the necessary conditions for these phenomena to manifest.
Temporal Conditions: Certain times may align environmental energies in ways that facilitate the occurrence of these phenomena.
This hypothesis suggests that a multidisciplinary approach, combining psychology, geology, physics, and cultural studies, is crucial for advancing our understanding of UAPs and related phenomena.
Based on our research (a review of thousands of cases), these are the determining factors of a UAP sighting or related paranormal event. A UAP or paranormal event occurs when the right person is in the right place at the right time.
However, it is missing one important variable and that variable has a huge impact: The Will and Actions of the NHI
These beings are conducting themselves and their activities according to their own agenda. We would argue that incidents. where these principles are not deterministic, occurred simply because it suited the NHI agenda (whatever that may be).
Yet, we consider it possible the factors in the integrated hypothesis may limit the time and targets which the NHI have available.
This NHI agenda needs to be studied both separately and in parallel, but it has to be viewed differently. We need to understand what the NHI achieved or hoped to achieve in these encounters. This is more like behavioral profiling.
A review of the cases has to be done to develop a reliable case pool and then the cases need to be analyzed to determine what the encounter most likely provided to the NHI and how it affected the contactee.
We’ve done this exercise, and the effects of the encounters appear to be mixed. Meaning they sometimes positively (healing, wisdom) but more often negatively (trauma, radiation) affect the individual. This could be the result of different factions of NHI interacting with humanity differently, or it could speak to a larger control mechanism and a long term plan of their own design. The NHI agenda, at this point, is unclear to everyone…
Additionally, we should note that these factors appear to work independently and in combination. For example, if you’re in the super right place at the super right time, it may not be necessary to be the right person. Conversely, if you’re the right person, the right place and time may be more flexible.
This is how it appears to work based on our current review and the state of our research. The Hitchhiker Effect also has an outsized effect on paranormal and UAP occurrences and points to a genetic or biological component to this phenomenon. This is noted in the integrative hypothesis as “family history” and “previous experiences.”
How’s that for deconstructing the woo…What could be more earthly than human biology?
De-Mystifying the Mystical:
We’ve assigned these beings the “mystical or magical” label because our ancestors didn’t know a lot about material science. We do. Yet, what we know is incomplete. Science and history are ever-evolving subjects. We don’t know what we don’t know. If nothing else, they’ve shown us that what we thought is impossible is not. That’s not magical or mystical…it’s opportunity.
Yet, it takes courage to accept the facts in UAP and Paranormal encounters. It takes the courage to research it and then it takes courage to believe credible people relaying incredible things.
That normally wouldn’t seem like much…except they keep saying the same thing…for thousands of years.
But the real challenge is accepting what you’ve found as fact and moving forward with it. Moving forward involves open and transparent study of the phenomenon we’ve outlined. That study should result in an effort of open and transparent communication with this phenomenon.
How would we communicate with the phenomenon? Naturally, we got some ideas!
Appendix: Integrating the Integrated
For those interested in pursuing the Integrated Hypotheses we offer the following suggestions:
Consciousness Studies and UAPs:
Highlight the link between consciousness and UAPs, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary studies involving neuroscience, psychology, and parapsychology to understand these interactions.
Support further exploration of telepathic communication and mind control as observed in credible cases.
Ultra-terrestrials and Their Capabilities:
Document and categorize the capabilities of Ultra-terrestrials as observed: time manipulation, transmedium travel, telepathy, shape-shifting, and more.
Establish a database of credible cases and analyze patterns in these abilities.
Frameworks for Understanding the Phenomenon:
Integrate Jungian theory, quantum mechanics, and parapsychological perspectives into the analytical models.
Develop a cross-disciplinary research agenda to explore these theories in relation to UAPs.
Environmental and Electromagnetic Factors:
Investigate hotspots like Skinwalker Ranch and the Hudson Valley for unique geophysical properties.
Study the impact of EMFs and other geophysical anomalies on human perception and UAP manifestations.
The Integrative UAP Hypothesis:
Use the proposed framework (right person, place, and time) to analyze and predict UAP encounters.
Consider the NHI agenda in case studies to understand their motives and long-term plans.
De-Mystifying the Mystical:
Promote the idea that UAP phenomena, while seemingly mystical, are opportunities for scientific exploration.
Encourage open-minded yet rigorous research methodologies.
This theoretical framework suggests a correlation between quantum mechanics and UAP encounters, proposing that both exhibit similar principles like superposition and observer-dependent outcomes. By analyzing UAPs through quantum lenses, insights into human consciousness and its role in shaping these phenomena may emerge, inviting further exploration of their mysterious nature.
Author’s Note: The below is presented as a theoretical framework to inspire discussion regarding the relationship between quantum mechanics and UAP. It is not intended to be the answer to all things. John Keel always said to be careful when presenting a hypothetical framework like this. So, in honor of John Keel… The below is intended for discussion only…and if you use it, please cite it.
Introduction:
The subjective and objective nature of UFO and UAP encounters bears a striking resemblance to research being conducted in (and the mechanics of) quantum computing and quantum science. This resemblance could be more than coincidental, and we could be looking at the wizard behind the curtain of the UFO phenomenon. Either way, looking at the UAP phenomenon through this lens may allow us to gain insights we did not have before. Let’s examine the similarities and compare them to the work of a couple of our greatest thinkers, Einstein and Tesla.
Explaining Quantum Superposition:
In both technical and non-technical terms, quantum superposition can be likened to a state of uncertainty. Imagine a quantum system as a coin in mid-air, not yet landed. It’s neither heads nor tails, but it’s also both AND entirely new mixes of heads and tails because it exists in a state of all possibilities simultaneously until observed, collapsing into one outcome. This inherent duality mirrors the essence of quantum superposition.
Another simplified analogy is dipping one finger on each hand into a pool of water. The circular ripples of waves would stretch out from each finger like a binary system. Yet, they would overlap at some point and become a new and more complex pattern. This new pattern would be quantum superposition.
Comparing Quantum Superposition to UAP Encounters:
Selective Observers:
UAP sightings appear to be exclusive to certain individuals, sometimes only being seen by one observer in a group, much like quantum systems waiting for observation. Just as a quantum system necessitates an observer to manifest an outcome, UAP encounters might require specific user requirements for manifestation. Similar to a computer that requires a login before displaying your desktop background.
Subjective Experiences:
The experiences associated with UAP sightings vary among individuals but occasionally exhibit shared elements. This subjectivity aligns with the unpredictable nature of quantum systems, where outcomes are influenced by observation. UAP encounters could similarly be influenced by the unique perspectives of observers.
The Quantum Computer Analogy:
To delve deeper into this theory, let’s analogize UAP encounters as interactions with a quantum computer system. Picture individuals entering this system, registering their presence. This registration could pave the way for what researchers and scientists at locations like Skinwalker Ranch describe as “The Hitchhiker Effect,” where these experiences follow individuals and even spread to others, much like the entanglement of quantum particles.
This “Hitchhiker Effect” may be responding to individuals with better “measuring tools” which may exist in the brain, genetics or elsewhere in their physiology such as their immune system. Something about the individual makes them more sensitive to the energy and the energy needs them in order to interact with the rest of us. Such an effect might be directed by an advanced civilization.
Exploring the Tesla Connection:
Drawing inspiration from the visionary Nikola Tesla, we can further enrich this theory by considering other aspects of the UAP phenomenon in relation to quantum computing principles.
Energy Sources:
UAPs might tap into an advanced energy source akin to the quantum bits or qubits used in quantum computers. This could explain their extraordinary maneuvers and capabilities. The amount of energy such qubits could store might account for their relatively small size and extraordinary capabilities.
Information Processing:
UAPs may possess a remarkable capacity for data processing, enabling them to adapt intelligently to their surroundings and observers. Quantum computing is currently at its beginning in our society. Yet, the quantum computing abilities of a more advanced civilization would allow them to imbue material with information or advanced machine learning that mimics intelligence.
Non-Locality and Spatiotemporal Manipulation:
Their ability to manipulate space and time could be likened to the non-local behavior observed in quantum systems. This is when quantum particles display correlations that defy explanation through classical physics. Just as UAPs are often said to defy current classical physics.
Multiverse Theory:
UAP encounters could offer glimpses into alternate dimensions, akin to the multiverse theory, as they traverse between realms. For example, the holographic multiverse is generally the idea that “the surface area of a space can encode the contents of the volume of the region.” Which is very similar to the concept of quantum superposition in computing where the qubit exists in a state of all possibilities.
Quantum Communication:
UAPs might serve as advanced communication tools, bridging gaps between different forms of intelligent life. Quantum communication can happen instantaneously or as Einstein liked to call it “Spooky Action at a distance.“
Transcending Limitations:
Like Tesla’s groundbreaking work in electrical engineering, UAPs challenge the limits of our understanding and could be attempting to teach us a new paradigm in physics.
Incorporating Albert Einstein’s Perspective:
Albert Einstein’s groundbreaking work in theoretical physics revolutionized our understanding of the universe. His theories of relativity and quantum physics provide a solid foundation for exploring the connection between UAP encounters and the quantum realm.
Einstein’s Relativity and UAPs:
Einstein’s theory of relativity challenged our notions of space and time. Could UAPs, by their ability to manipulate space and time, be operating within the framework of Einstein’s theories? Their appearance and disappearance could be explained through a relativistic lens. Yet, such a relativistic craft could contain all of the technologies necessary to create a quantum energy which alters our perceptions.
E=mc² and Energy Sources:
Einstein’s famous equation, E=mc², signifies the equivalence of energy and matter. UAPs might harness an energy source beyond our comprehension, mirroring the relationship between energy and matter in Einstein’s theory. “Mass is dynamic quantity and can have different values, and in quantum physics, mass of a particle can be in a quantum ‘superposition’ of two different values.” source
According to the famous equation E=MC2, the mass of any object is held together by energy.
Quantum Gravity and Spacetime Manipulation:
Einstein’s quest for a unified theory, including quantum gravity, suggests the interconnectedness of all physical phenomena. UAPs’ ability to manipulate spacetime may resonate with Einstein’s vision of a unified theory.
Unified Theory of Everything:
Einstein’s lifelong pursuit of a “Theory of Everything” that unifies all natural forces finds a curious parallel in our exploration. UAP encounters, like unexplained quantum phenomena, might be pieces of this grand puzzle.
Theory: Quantum Superposition in UFO Encounters
In the realm of quantum mechanics, the concept of superposition asserts that particles can exist in multiple states simultaneously until observed, much like a coin suspended between heads and tails. In a similar vein, consider the UFO phenomenon as a cosmic qubit, where all potential states and forms coexist, waiting for an observer to collapse the wave function and reveal a specific reality.
Measurement and Observation:
User Inputs:
Just as a quantum system takes shape based on the observer’s measurement, the UFO phenomenon may be molded by the contactee’s inputs. These inputs encompass a broad spectrum of factors, including the contactee’s beliefs, ontological view, state of mind, and even their intent. These variables act as parameters that influence the manifestation of the phenomenon.
Reactivity:
The UFO phenomenon behaves reactively, responding to the unique set of inputs provided by the contactee. Like a quantum system that takes on different characteristics based on how it’s observed, the UFO encounter adapts and manifests in a manner intricately linked to the contactee’s consciousness.
Unknown Entity’s Intent:
An intriguing variable in this equation is the intent of the entity behind the UFO encounter. Just as the behavior of quantum particles can be influenced by external forces, the intent of this unknown entity could act as a variable that interacts with the contactee’s inputs, further shaping the encounter.
A Multifaceted Phenomenon:
This theory proposes that the UFO phenomenon is inherently multifaceted, mirroring the complexity of quantum superposition. When a contactee encounters the phenomenon, they become an active participant in a dynamic and ever-changing reality. The specific form, purpose, and nature of the encounter are not predetermined but are co-created by the contactee’s inputs and the intent of the enigmatic entity.
By blending the principles of quantum mechanics with the UFO phenomenon, this theory provides a fresh perspective on these mysterious encounters. It suggests that the UFO phenomenon is not a singular, static phenomenon but rather a dynamic and reactive entity that takes shape through the interaction between the contactee’s consciousness and an unknown intent. Embracing this perspective invites us to explore the profound interplay between human consciousness, quantum phenomena, and the enigmatic world of UAP encounters. In the words of Albert Einstein, “The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science.”
Are these encounters, in fact, interactions with a literal quantum system, delivering experiences based on individual inputs? This connection between UAP sightings and quantum mechanics raises captivating questions that warrant further investigation. Embracing this theory challenges us to embrace a future where we understand UAP phenomena as a bridge between the mysteries of the quantum world and our reality.
Applying this theory to Paranormal and UFO Related Phenomena
Quantum Superposition and Paranormal Phenomena:
Apparitions and Ghostly Encounters:
Imagine apparitions as quantum entities existing in a superposition of states—both present and non-present. They become observable when encountered by individuals, influenced by the observer’s beliefs, emotions, and state of mind. Just as a quantum system’s behavior changes upon measurement, the appearance of ghosts may vary based on the observer’s mindset.
Poltergeist Activity:
Poltergeist phenomena could be akin to the sudden collapse of a quantum wave function. When suppressed emotions or energy build up in an environment, they exist in a superposition of potential actions. The presence of a person or entity may serve as the “measurement” that triggers the release of this energy, resulting in seemingly spontaneous and chaotic poltergeist activity.
Time Slips and Temporal Anomalies:
Time slips and temporal anomalies might occur when an individual’s perception enters a quantum-like superposition, allowing them to glimpse alternative timelines or moments from the past or future. These experiences could be the result of consciousness interacting with the quantum fabric of time, briefly accessing different temporal states.
Quantum Superposition and UFO-Related Phenomena:
Shape-Shifting UFOs:
UFOs often exhibit shape-shifting characteristics, mirroring quantum particles’ ability to exist in multiple states. These craft might be in a quantum superposition of forms, with their appearance solidifying when observed, much like quantum particles take on specific properties upon measurement.
Telepathic Communication with Entities:
Telepathic communication reported in UFO encounters could be a manifestation of quantum entanglement between the experiencer’s consciousness and the unknown entities. Just as entangled particles instantaneously influence each other’s states, a connection might exist between human consciousness and extraterrestrial or interdimensional beings.
Dimensional Shifts and Warp Drives:
UFO propulsion systems that appear to defy conventional physics may operate by exploiting the principles of quantum superposition and entanglement. They could shift between dimensions or manipulate spacetime, much like quantum particles interact with different states and dimensions.
Parallel Universes and Multiverse Phenomena:
Some UFO experiences might offer glimpses into parallel universes, aligning with the concept of multiverse theory. These encounters could be the result of quantum entanglement or superposition, allowing contactees to briefly interact with alternate realities.
Quantum Superposition and Three-Dimensional Fully Formed – Material UFO Craft
Imagine that UFOs, as fully three-dimensional craft, exist in a quantum state of superposition concerning their spatial dimensions. Much like particles in a quantum superposition exist in multiple states until observed, these craft can simultaneously occupy various spatial configurations until they are “measured” or interacted with in some way.
Quantum Superposition of Spatial Dimensions:
In this theory, UFOs are not bound by conventional physical constraints. Instead, they exist in a quantum superposition of different three-dimensional states. These states could represent various sizes, shapes, and configurations of the craft. When they remain unobserved, they maintain this superposition, akin to Schrödinger’s cat being both alive and dead in a closed box until opened.
Observer-Dependent Manifestation:
The moment a UFO is observed or detected by an external entity, whether human or otherwise, its quantum superposition collapses, and a specific three-dimensional configuration is chosen from the multitude of possibilities. This collapse of the wave function results in the craft manifesting in a particular form, giving the appearance of a fully three-dimensional UFO.
Manipulation of Quantum Energy:
The propulsion systems of these UFOs could harness quantum energy to transition between different states within their superposition, allowing them to change size, shape, and configuration at will. This manipulation of quantum energy enables the craft to perform incredible maneuvers and morphological transformations.
Interdimensional Travel:
Additionally, these craft might exploit quantum entanglement or quantum tunneling to access alternate dimensions or spacetime regions. When doing so, they navigate through the quantum fabric of reality, allowing for rapid shifts in spatial dimensions that transcend our conventional understanding of space.
Human-Non-Human Interaction:
The intent of the entities controlling these craft could serve as a variable that influences their appearance. When encountered by humans, these entities may adapt the craft’s three-dimensional configuration based on the contactee’s consciousness, beliefs, and expectations, further blurring the line between observer and observed.
In this theory, fully three-dimensional UFO craft are not constrained by fixed physical forms but are quantum entities capable of existing in a multitude of spatial configurations. Their appearance and behavior are intricately linked to the act of observation, collapsing their quantum superposition into a specific state. This perspective offers a novel explanation for the seemingly limitless capabilities of UFOs and their ability to challenge our understanding of three-dimensional space.
Wave-Particle Duality Chart: Wave Behavior Section:Colored waves passing through a double slit, creating an interference pattern. Each color could represent different wavelengths or energy levels. Particle Behavior Section:Colored particles passing through a single slit, with colors possibly indicating different types of particles or their respective energies.
Testing the Hypothesis : UFO’s as Quantum Phenomena
High Frequency Waves:
If UFO phenomena are indeed quantum in nature, high-frequency waves associated with their energy signatures may exhibit unique characteristics that differ from conventional sources. Yet, spectral analyzers are readily available and data of radio activity during UAP events already exists. While the specific types of high-frequency waves would depend on the underlying quantum processes, here are some possibilities to consider:
Quantum Emission Signatures:
If UFOs harness quantum phenomena for propulsion or energy generation, they might emit high-frequency electromagnetic waves that correspond to quantum transitions or fluctuations. These emissions could span a wide range of frequencies, including radio waves, microwaves, and even X-rays or gamma rays, depending on the nature of the quantum processes involved. Certain phenomena can generate specific electromagnetic frequencies as part of their quantum processes. If UFOs are indeed quantum entities or involve quantum processes, it’s conceivable that they could emit distinct frequencies, such as 1.6 GHz, as part of these processes.
Modulated Frequencies:
Quantum systems can exhibit rapid and complex fluctuations in their energy states. UFOs might emit high-frequency waves with irregular or modulated patterns, indicating the dynamic nature of their quantum energy sources. These modulations could occur across various parts of the electromagnetic spectrum.
Resonance Effects:
Quantum systems often resonate at specific frequencies related to their energy levels. UFOs might emit high-frequency waves that correspond to quantum resonances within their propulsion or energy systems. Detecting resonance-related signatures could provide insights into the underlying quantum mechanics.
Sudden Bursts:
Quantum phenomena can manifest as abrupt and spontaneous events. High-frequency wave emissions from UFOs might occur as sudden bursts or spikes in intensity, resembling transient signals that are not characteristic of typical human-made technologies.
Relative Coolness:
In order to maintain coherence for a quantum system computers that utilize quantum technology must be kept just at a temperature near absolute zero. Thus, we would expect objects utilizing this technology to operate at a lower temperature. This may explain why UAP objects traveling at high speeds may seem cooler than the air around it, when recorded by thermal cameras.
Entanglement-Induced Waves:
If UFOs involve quantum entanglement in their operation, they might emit high-frequency waves that are correlated with other quantum entities or events. Detecting entanglement-induced wave patterns could indicate a connection between UFOs and quantum phenomena.
Frequency Shifts:
Quantum systems can exhibit frequency shifts when transitioning between energy states. Observing high-frequency wave emissions with noticeable frequency shifts over short time intervals might suggest quantum interactions or changes within the UFO.
Nonlinear Effects:
Quantum superposition and entanglement can lead to nonlinear effects in wave emissions. UFOs might emit high-frequency waves with nonlinear features, such as harmonic generation or frequency mixing, which could distinguish them from conventional sources
Quantum Transitions:
Quantum transitions involving particles or systems can result in the emission of photons at particular frequencies. These emissions are characteristic of quantum phenomena. The 1.6 GHz frequency observed in UFO events might be indicative of a specific quantum transition relevant to their operation.
Entanglement and Coherence:
Quantum entanglement and coherence can lead to synchronized behaviors between entangled particles or systems. If UFOs are utilizing quantum entanglement, the emission of a consistent frequency like 1.6 GHz across multiple events could suggest coherence among the quantum states within the UFO system.
Existing spectral analysis files could be examined for these key markers utilizing customized software, software settings, applications and/or AI.
Conclusion
By applying the theory of quantum superposition to paranormal and UFO-related phenomena, we gain a unified perspective that transcends traditional explanations. These occurrences become manifestations of the quantum world’s complexity, where human consciousness plays a pivotal role in shaping the nature of these experiences. Just as quantum particles reveal their properties through measurement, so too do these phenomena unfold when observed by the conscious observer, bridging the gap between the mysterious and the quantum realm.
Appendix/Working Notes:
Key points to consider:
The system is malleable.
The system can be manipulated or directed by an unknown intelligence, consciousness, entity or technology
The system is subject to user inputs
Some users are more sensitive to this system than others
The sensitivity of the user can be influenced by psychological conditions
The sensitivity of the user is influenced by proximity to the energy (haunted locations, UFO hotspots…an energy containing the many possibilities of an encounter UFO, Apparition, Entity as we well as the effects Healing, Injury, Abduction.)
Example: The Miracle at Fatima – 10’s of thousands of people, 10’s of thousands of different experiences and effects. Theory: they were hit with this energy that contained all of these possibilities and a direction from an entity – the experiences were then interpreted with input from the user, yielding the various outcomes.
Fully material UAP craft or entities might be the product of this process. They may have required a human to make them fully material. Thus, indicating why humans are so important to the phenomenon, and why the phenomenon has changed its appearance over time (from faerie to alien).
The people who were interacting with the system began creating different things (when they encountered the energy) from the endless possibilities resulting from encountering an energy capable of quantum superposition.
The original “blueprints” created by humans would still be a part of that energy. Blueprints created by our ancestors of creatures from their folklore. Thus, the phenomenon could still access those blueprints and appear as things like a “dogman” as it already had the blueprint. Potentially, it could access things from our future as blueprints as well. Which may explain the tic-tac craft we see now, and why they resemble our science fiction. We made them.
Back to our analogy of two fingers. One dipped into one side of the pool and the other dipped into the other side of the pool. The resulting overlap of the waves would represent superposition. In UFO encounters, it seems as though some encounters with the system are random, as if the “user” entered the system and encountered superposition.
Other encounters seem as though the “user” dipped one finger into the pool, and another intelligence dipped in the other finger. The resulting overlap is the encounter.
Quantum Superposition and Entanglement Chart: Overlapping Waves/Circles:Each color represents a different quantum state in superposition. Connected Particles:Distinct colors for each particle and the connecting line symbolize quantum entanglement, with the colors indicating correlated states.
Speculative: Quantum Emissions
If we were to use and analyze existing spectral data from UAP encounters in order to look for Quantum Emissions, it would require speculating on what a quantum emission might look like which involves making educated guesses based on quantum principles and their potential manifestation in electromagnetic emissions. Keep in mind that these are speculative hypotheses, and the actual emissions, if they exist, would require empirical validation.
Coherent Photon Emissions:
Quantum entanglement or superposition within UFOs may lead to the emission of coherent photons at specific frequencies.
These emissions could manifest as sharp, discrete spectral lines in the electromagnetic spectrum.
The frequencies of these lines could be unusual or distinct from known natural sources.
Polarization-Dependent Emissions:
Quantum processes within UFOs might result in polarized emissions.
Spectral data could reveal patterns of polarization, indicating the quantum nature of the emissions.
These patterns may change dynamically, suggesting quantum state transitions.
Emissions at Non-Classical Frequencies:
Quantum phenomena often involve energy transitions that don’t conform to classical physics.
The emissions could occur at frequencies that deviate from what would be expected based on classical electromagnetic radiation patterns.
Unconventional frequencies, such as fractional values or irrational numbers, might be observed.
Entangled Photon Pairs:
Quantum entanglement could lead to the simultaneous emission of photon pairs with correlated properties.
Spectral data might reveal dual peaks or emissions occurring at pairs of closely related frequencies.
These correlated emissions could be indicative of entanglement.
Spectral Modulations and Interference Patterns:
Quantum processes may result in complex spectral modulations or interference patterns.
The spectral data might exhibit sinusoidal or oscillatory patterns, indicating quantum interference effects.
The frequencies of these patterns could be related to specific quantum phenomena within the UFO.
Non-Exponential Decay Signatures:
Quantum systems often exhibit non-exponential decay of excited states.
Emission data might show non-standard decay profiles, deviating from exponential decay curves seen in classical processes.
This could be indicative of quantum transitions and coherence.
Temporal Correlations:
Quantum processes can result in temporal correlations between emissions.
Spectral data could reveal emissions that are temporally correlated, suggesting quantum behaviors within the UFO.
The correlations may be unexpected based on classical physics.
Speculative: Quantum Field Generator
Hypothetically, if a quantum field/gravity generator were possible and in use by an advanced civilization, we can speculate on what it might accomplish.
Quantum Cloaking:
The quantum field generator could manipulate local quantum fields to achieve a form of cloaking, rendering the UAP effectively invisible to conventional detection methods. By bending light or other electromagnetic waves around the craft, it could evade radar, visual observation, and even spectral analysis.
Instantaneous Displacement:
Leveraging principles of quantum entanglement or superposition, the generator might enable instantaneous displacement of the UAP across vast distances. This would explain the sudden appearance and disappearance commonly reported in UAP sightings.
Dimensional Manipulation:
The generator could potentially access other dimensions or alternate realities, allowing the UAP to phase in and out of our spacetime. This would account for the reported ability of UAP to defy known physics and seemingly violate the laws of motion.
Energy Source:
The quantum field generator might harness quantum energy sources, where quantum fluctuations or vacuum energy serve as a boundless reservoir of power. This could explain the longevity and endurance of UAP during encounters.
Quantum Communication:
Advanced communication systems linked to the generator could operate through quantum entanglement, ensuring instantaneous and secure communication across vast distances.
Interdimensional Effects:
The generator’s operation could produce unique electromagnetic emissions or quantum signatures that are detectable during UAP encounters. These emissions might include entangled photons, exotic spectral patterns, or non-classical electromagnetic phenomena.
Temporal Manipulation:
The UAP’s temporal behavior, such as time dilation or apparent time travel, could be facilitated by the manipulation of quantum fields, altering the local spacetime metric.
As mentioned above harmonics could be employed to specify the effects of the quantum field.
Incorporating harmonics into advanced technology, such as a hypothetical “quantum field or gravity generator” associated with UAP or UFO phenomena, could be a means to achieve specific effects or capabilities. Harmonics, which refer to multiples of a fundamental frequency, are known to play important roles in various physical and electromagnetic phenomena. If harmonics are present in order to produce this effect we could gather data.
If this technology is being employed it could be used to the following effect:
Energy Resonance:
The technology could exploit harmonics to resonate with specific energy levels within quantum systems or the vacuum itself. By matching the harmonic frequencies to the resonant frequencies of quantum states, it might efficiently extract energy from the quantum vacuum, serving as a nearly limitless power source.
Stealth and Invisibility:
Harmonics could be employed to manipulate electromagnetic signatures. By generating specific harmonic frequencies, the technology might cancel out or mask the UAP’s electromagnetic emissions, making it virtually invisible to conventional sensors.
Warping Spacetime:
Harmonics could play a role in spacetime manipulation. By inducing harmonic vibrations in spacetime itself, the technology might create localized distortions that enable rapid propulsion or even create wormholes or shortcuts in spacetime.
Dimensional Shifting:
Harmonics could facilitate transitions between different dimensions or alternate realities. By tuning harmonic frequencies to specific dimensional resonances, the technology might enable dimensional shifts, explaining the apparent disappearance or re-appearance of UAP.
Communication:
Harmonic frequencies could be used for secure and instantaneous communication. By entangling particles or information with specific harmonic properties, the technology might establish communication channels that are immune to interception or eavesdropping.
Time Manipulation:
Harmonics might be employed to control the perception of time. By modulating harmonic frequencies, the technology could create localized time dilation or contraction, affecting the passage of time within the vicinity of the UAP.
Fortean Winds: Scientific Research into the Unexplained, Paranormal and Anomalous 