Illustration of an AI system analyzing a mystical grimoire — Fortean Winds AI and grimoire analysis article

Quantifying the Mystical: Patterns and Practices in Grimoires

Author’s Note: Well, this is a fun one…We took a bunch of old mystical texts and put them into AI to do some pattern analysis. The results are fascinating. Of course, the big question I’m trying to answer in this series is: Do these grimoires have an underlying method that points to a technology? If so, what is that technology?

I couldn’t imagine a more Fortean Winds project than this one, so this will be the first of a few articles exploring these texts in a futuristic fortean fashion (+1 for alliteration).

The corpus is 16 texts spanning roughly 1,400 years and four major traditions — Jewish mysticism, Islamic astrology, Christian ceremonial magic, and Western occultism. The question going in: do they share enough structural DNA to suggest a common underlying system? Here’s what the data shows.


Introduction:

In this expanded exploration, we’ll dive deeper into temporal alignments, planetary correspondences, auditory practices, and other recurring motifs to uncover the underlying principles of grimoire magic.


Time: The Rhythm of Rituals

Repeated Patterns

Expanded Insights

Speculation on Effects


Distribution of Moon Phases in Rituals Mentioned in Grimoires (Fortean Winds, 2024)

Planets: Celestial Correspondences

Repeated Patterns

Expanded Insights

Speculation on Effects


Sounds: The Resonance of Power

Repeated Patterns

Expanded Insights

Speculation on Effects

Recurring Patterns in Grimoire (Fortean Winds, 2024)

We’ve previously discussed the unique acoustic effects brought about the unique shape of the chamber in the Ħal Saflieni Hypogeum.


Symbols: Encoded Mysteries

Repeated Patterns

Expanded Insights

Speculation on Effects


Shared Practices: Evidence of Common Methodology

Repeated Elements Across Grimoires

  1. Invocation Structures: Most rituals follow a three-step pattern:
    • Preparation (purification and tool preparation).
    • Invocation (chanting and symbolic gestures).
    • Conclusion (dismissal or grounding).
  2. Materials: Grimoires frequently mention materials like candles, incense, and engraved metals, suggesting sensory engagement enhances ritual focus.
  3. Psychological Preparation: Texts emphasize the practitioner’s purity, intention, and belief, which modern psychology might liken to establishing a primed mental state.

Shared Techniques and Innovations


Conclusion

The patterns are real and they’re specific. Not the vague structural echoes you’d expect from any group of texts in the same genre, but numerical systems, symbolic assignments, and ritual architectures that appear consistently across texts with no documented contact. Circles mean containment across every tradition in the corpus. Specific planetary hours govern specific operations across every century. Sound is treated as a functional variable, not an aesthetic one, in texts from 4th-century Jewish mysticism through 17th-century Western ceremonial magic.

That’s the finding. Whether it points at a shared ancient source, independent convergence on the same underlying physics, or something else entirely is what the next four parts work to establish. Part 2 goes deeper into the symbolic grammar — what the shapes are doing and why the consistency matters.

Appendix: Grimoires Used in the Analysis

The following is a list of the grimoires referenced during the analysis, along with their approximate dates of origin and a brief description of their significance. These works represent a diverse spectrum of esoteric traditions and provide a comprehensive foundation for understanding the recurring patterns identified in this study.


1. Lemegeton (Clavicula Salomonis)

2. The Goetia

3. Ars Notoria

4. Heptameron

5. Picatrix

6. The Grand Grimoire

7. Key of Solomon (Clavicula Salomonis)

8. The Book of Abramelin

9. The Grimoire of Pope Honorius

10. The Sworn Book of Honorius (Liber Juratus)

11. Liber Razielis (Book of Raziel)

12. The Arbatel of Magic

13. The Book of Enochian Magic (John Dee’s Diaries)

14. Sefer HaRazim (Book of Mysteries)

15. Liber AL vel Legis (The Book of the Law)

16. The Magus by Francis Barrett


Commonalities in Date and Origin

This appendix serves as a reference for tracing the lineage of magical traditions and their enduring appeal across cultures and centuries.

10 responses to “Quantifying the Mystical: Patterns and Practices in Grimoires”

  1. Do these grimoire have an underlying method that points to a technology? If so, what is that technology?

    I enjoyed this analysis, but while the above is an excellent question, and you gave an excellent answer via this and related articles, as a minor practitioner I need to point out there is a key issue here such analysis can not capture. There are two key notes that get at the crux of the issue.

    1. One can do all the sygils, rituals, and read the words and get nothing.
    2. The same symbols, words, etc… from grimoire (or equivalent, or just rituals) of different cultures can have different, even *OPOSITE* meaning/function. This will be avoided in your current analysis, because as you point out, the ones you used are all from Western occultists who all share fundamental cultural concepts. While this will help you avoid contradiction though, it means most of what you get is the culture you are sampling not the “magic”

    There are two conclusions from the above two points:

    1. None of this is real.
    2. There is something far more extract and subtle than what can be picked up by your analytical approach.

    If you subscribe to 1. well… then whether right or wrong there is nothing more to say.

    As for 2. Here is the critical portion: the magic mostly happens via the totally irational subconcious. The grimiores are instructions for the rational mind to try and direct the irational subconcios, which is as a wild beast. To get the irrational mind to do the magic there are a number of steps.

    1. Discipline it at least slightly with respect to the rational mind’s will via meditation. Those older practitioners whoes grimiores you are using meditated succesfully through prayer (its like using a mantra.)
    2. Through the repitition of culture, ingrain the symbols (words, diagrams, gestures, etc…) with meaning and explainations so deeply that their meaning penetrates down to the subconcious. This is why the same “magical” symbols can have different or even *OPOSITE* meanings across different cultures and still be correct for all of them. The symbols alone are meaningless, it is only via a “complete mind conciousness” of them from the perspective of the culture that generated them do they have any magical meaning or power.
    3. Need to convince the subconcious. Any doubt is instant dispell. One has to fully convince the unconcious: the placebo effect must be fully on board.
    4. The emotions themselves must be fully enguaged and resonant. Even to do all of the above, if the emotions aren’t properly on board you get nothing. Famous practitioners have described this as being akin to building the whole circuit board, but not connecting it to a power source leaving it thus innert and non-functional.

    Points 3 and 4 above create the personal variation and commonality of elaborate “artistic” ritual. I.e. in needing to convince and emotionally stimulate one’s own mind, one needs at least some “custom” personal approaches much in the way ones arcane symbols must be taylored to their own culture. The artistic nature (via elaborate cerimony and mystic looking grimoirs and symbols) of magic — often refered to as The Art — is because one is trying to “provoke” the proper emotions to power the operations. The AI is going to miss that entirely.

    To the points above, there is also so called Chaos magicians. They meditate, and then eschew any tradition and create their own symbols from scratch to send message, convince, and emotionally stimulate their subconcious mind. Most modern Chaos magicians are too lazy to get things working properly (not dissiplining the subconcious or doing the efforts to stimulate and enguage it sufficiently) but the serious ones like Osman Spare (though he died before the term “Chaos magician” was created) or Mr. Carrol have achieved shocking things. Even a few non-believers got convinced Spare could summon rain as desired, even on cloudless days, with a fairly simple ritual using entirely symbols of his own design (which thereby wouldn’t work for anyone else as they were too personal and not cultural as to have any proper meaning to anyone else’s subconcious mind.)

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thank you so much for these notes! Very insightful. This is such a wonderful explanation. It clarifies much of what we saw in the study. The “user” and their “state” are of the utmost importance. If we were looking at it as tech. Is that about right?

    Like

    • Yes that is about right. One is mostly trying to “program your own unconscious” and then express something with “all of your being” where the later is dependent entirely on your own understanding of expressing things with your being (i.e. if you want X how do you express the force to cause that via your: emotions, unconscious thoughts, conscious thoughts, words, actions, and <anything else you can think of> simultaneously in a way you convince yourself that these are linked to achieving the effect you want.)

      This is a little harder than it at first sounds, because a lot of your unconscious mind (the heaviest lifter here) has been programed by your culture and society without you realizing it. This is true even if you were kind of an outsider and reject them (then they may have “anti-programed” you in the opposite directions but that is still programming.) So you kind of need to dig out your unconscious mind’s “symbolic language,” beliefs, and expectations. This is a key part of the critical “know thyself” declaration for practitioners (i.e. learn how you actually work mentally, especially those weird dark unconscious and irrational parts of your brain, so you can get them to do what you want.) Its a symbolic, emotional, and belief based mental space so it doesn’t always respond to rational analysis or rational attempts to control it, you kind of have to go on your own personal journey to learn it, and then you can work with it to get it to do things. But what this means, is sometimes within ones own culture there is a “technology” for magic that accidentally created by the nature of certain symbols in that culture. As a result their can be culturally relevant magic technologies.

      There is one complexity not covered in my original post that actually does work well with your analysis so I should bring it up here. There is sort of a cumulative streamlining to users practicing rituals. I.e., while one can take the Osman Spare approach and build all your own rituals from scratch. Rituals that have been successfully practiced by a lot of people start to have like a “momentum” to them and — all other things being equal — do tend to be a little easier to get an effect out of or a little stronger of effect than one could get otherwise with a fully from-scratch ritual. My guess (which is just speculation) is this has to do with the Jungian concept of the collective unconscious. I.e. as one programs their own mind by training for them (burning the symbols and their function into as many layers of the mind as possible, doing the mediation, etc…) and doing the rituals, it also leaves a small signature of all of this in the collective unconscious. Then when this is all repeated enough times by enough different people there is some “momentum” for the ritual to work from the collective unconscious as the collective has (perhaps unintentionally) started training the collective unconscious in the ritual. This doesn’t qualify as any sort of logical concrete underlying technology per say, its really more of “creating” a “magic language of symbols beliefs and actions” through repetition that the collective unconscious “speaks” but it might show up as a small amount underlying technology by your analysis, and might be able to be treated as such.

      Also sorry the original post has so many errors. After I wrote it I went back and started editing it to a better state, and my phone just stopped being able to edit on that field for whatever reason (I blame my phone not your cite) so I reached a point where I either had to post or possibly loose it. Thus I posted it with far less editing than I would have liked.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a reply to Mystical Technologies: Energy, Mind, and Space – Fortean Winds: Scientific Research into the Unexplained, Paranormal and Anomalous Cancel reply