We break down the barriers to understanding the UAP phenomenon, emphasizing the Dogma Firewall and Digital Cage. The former restricts belief systems, while the latter suppresses data through surveillance and media control. To advance inquiry, it advocates for memory preservation, diversified perception, de-dogmatization of language, and public empowerment in critical thinking.
Every civilization builds walls around what it dares to know. In our time those walls have names: the Digital Cage and the Dogma Firewall. The first, a network of political and corporate control that manages what can be seen; the second, a psychological architecture that governs what can be believed. Together they form the perfect containment field for whatever we call the UAP phenomenon.
I. The Dogma Firewall — Belief as Defense Mechanism
For clarity: by Dogma I mean any closed explanatory loop—religious, scientific, or cultural—that interprets new data only in ways that preserve itself. The UAP, treated as an adaptive intelligence or Reactive Interface, exploits those loops.
Scientific orthodoxy insists that what cannot be replicated cannot be real.
Religious literalism translates every anomaly into angel or demon.
Pop culture trivializes the whole affair as entertainment.
Three boxes, one result: the truth—non-local, symbolic, multidimensional—cannot occupy any of them. The Firewall works perfectly because it uses our need for certainty as its code.
II. The Digital Cage — How Power Amplifies Dogma
Richard Thieme described the Cage as the oligarchy’s global feedback system: surveillance, privatization, and narrative control. It does not need to invent new deceptions; it only has to amplify the Dogma Firewall already in place.
Oligarchic Tool
Dogma Amplified
The Lock
Corporate Black Box – defense privatization of genuine UAP data
Scientific dogma: only repeatable phenomena count.
Data moves into trade-secret vaults. Non-repeatable = classified = gone.
Media Concentration – 90 % of narrative through a handful of conglomerates
Ridicule dogma: only fools see UFOs.
Every real witness drowned in hoax noise.
Whistleblower Retribution
Authority dogma: truth flows downward.
The cost of dissent becomes ruin; inquiry self-censors.
The result is an elegant symmetry: internal belief systems suppress comprehension while external power systems suppress data. The Phenomenon’s secrecy needs no conspiracy; it co-opts the machinery we already built.
III. Updating the Lineage — From Keel to Thieme to Fortean Winds
Thinker
Model
Insight Reframed
John Keel
Super-Spectrum
UAPs are bleed-throughs from a wider reality; the Cage polices the boundaries of that spectrum.
Jacques Vallée
Control System
The Phenomenon shapes human consciousness through symbol; the oligarchy administers the test.
Richard Thieme
Digital Cage
Information architecture itself becomes the new priesthood.
Fortean Winds (Ram X)
Reactive Interface
The UAP is participatory: it reflects our beliefs back at us. Secrecy is mutual—a pact between human control and non-human adaptation.
IV. The Blindspot and the Opportunity
The dominant institutions are not guarding national security; they are guarding conceptual stability. They know, perhaps dimly, that full disclosure would detonate the operating myths of economics, theology, and science simultaneously. Hence the “real bird” of UAP knowledge—if released—must still land in their hand.
To study the phenomenon, we must therefore study the system that forbids study. The breakthrough will not come from one more leaked video but from dismantling the feedback loop that teaches us which questions are “reasonable.”
V. Bypassing the Cage
Bypassing is not rebellion; it is calibration.
Preserve memory. Archive data before it is monetized or erased.
Diversify perception. Use independent sensors, open-source analytics, and citizen labs.
De-dogmatize language. Treat “ET,” “hallucination,” and “spiritual” as provisional metaphors, not final answers.
Hold institutions accountable but resist paranoia—the goal is transparency, not another cult of secrecy.
Teach discernment. Give the public the tools of chain-of-custody and metadata literacy. The antidote to the Cage is competence.
Epilogue: The Task of Fortean Winds
Our work is not to prove the UAP real. Reality will manage that on its own schedule. Our work is to make inquiry possible again.
If the Digital Cage controls what can be seen, and the Dogma Firewall controls what can be believed, then the only free space left is the narrow edge between them. That is where Fortean Winds stands—testing locks, mapping cracks, and reminding anyone who listens that mystery is not the enemy of truth, only its next horizon.
At Fortean Winds, we propose that paranormal phenomena, such as Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) and the Hitchhiker Effect, may stem from quantum interactions. The CIA’s secret investigations validated EVP’s existence, suggesting that these anomalies could reveal deeper truths about reality, challenging existing scientific skepticism and prompting further exploration into the unknown.
At Fortean Winds, we’ve long believed that paranormal phenomena aren’t merely superstition—they’re misunderstood aspects of reality awaiting scientific understanding. During our review of an old report, we found revelations from declassified CIA research into Electronic Voice Phenomena (EVP) that offers groundbreaking support for our quantum-focused hypothesis, notably aligning with the strange and pervasive “Hitchhiker Effect.”
CIA’s Secret EVP Research: What Did They Discover?
The CIA’s investigation into EVPs—anomalous voices recorded without any identifiable physical source—was conducted under rigorous scientific conditions. Utilizing electromagnetic shielding (Faraday cages), acoustic isolation chambers, sensitive microphones, and meticulous frequency analyses, their studies repeatedly documented voices exhibiting clear linguistic structure, emotional inflections, and intelligent interaction patterns. Crucially, these voices persisted despite rigorous isolation methods designed explicitly to eliminate fraud, external interference, or equipment malfunction.
These anomalous findings strongly support the existence of genuine phenomena historically classified as “paranormal.” Yet, intriguingly, the CIA never publicly acknowledged these results, leaving behind only quietly archived documents.
Bridging EVP and the Hitchhiker Effect
The CIA’s documented evidence mirrors another phenomenon Fortean Winds extensively investigates: the Hitchhiker Effect. Individuals experiencing close encounters with unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) frequently report subsequent paranormal experiences—anomalies seemingly “attached” or entangled with them long after the initial event.
Historical records, from Kenneth Arnold’s seminal UFO sighting to modern encounters at Skinwalker Ranch, demonstrate a consistent pattern. Witnesses experience lasting anomalies, from poltergeist-like disturbances to inexplicable auditory phenomena remarkably similar to EVPs. These subsequent experiences often spread to close associates, behaving almost contagiously, suggesting a deeper connection to quantum entanglement theories.
The Quantum Hypothesis: EVP and Paranormal Contagion
At Fortean Winds, we posit that these phenomena—EVPs and the Hitchhiker Effect alike—arise from quantum-level interactions. Intense paranormal encounters could cause entanglement between individuals and an unknown quantum field, creating lasting links manifesting as subsequent anomalous experiences.
Quantum entanglement, a scientifically recognized phenomenon where particles remain connected regardless of distance, aligns closely with the CIA’s EVP research. The persistence of anomalous voices despite controlled isolation suggests non-local quantum interactions rather than traditional electromagnetic or acoustic phenomena.
Implications: A New Understanding of Paranormal Reality
The alignment between CIA findings, the Hitchhiker Effect, and quantum theory is more than coincidental. It suggests our world might inherently operate with quantum complexity at a macroscopic scale we have yet to fully understand. The CIA’s quiet recognition of these phenomena challenges skepticism, paving the way for scientific inquiry into areas once dismissed as superstition.
The Fortean Call to Action
The question remains open: if the CIA once secretly recognized anomalous phenomena like EVPs, how much more might our reality hold beyond current scientific comprehension? Fortean Winds invites researchers, experiencers, and open-minded skeptics alike to reconsider the boundaries of what’s possible.
By uncovering these quantum echoes, we might just uncover deeper truths about reality itself.
The report examines the correlation between UAP sightings and ancient tunnel systems using robust data analysis. It found significant clustering of sightings near tunnels, suggesting potential connections to cryptoterrestrial activity. Additionally, lunar phases showed moderate associations, while no links were identified with fault lines or magnetic anomalies, narrowing future research focus.
Author’s Note: You’ll notice a number of articles like this on the site in which we use AI or LLMs to perform some in-depth analysis. When we do this, we usually work with the machine to write the report. Sometimes we go back and add color, but lately I try not to do that.
When I use the machine to write I prefer to write a long author’s note like this and keep the report clearly the report. It’s not right to say it’s all AI. This report took me about 8 hours or so…granted…just two years ago it would have taken two days and two people…
I don’t mind the machine writing down the results. It’s a calculator, we don’t rewrite our calculator’s results, but it’s not so good at adding the color. So, let me add the color.
This report is really exploring the Cryptoterrestrial hypothesis. Which we at Fortean Winds feel strongly is one component of a larger, complex phenomenon.
Within the Cryptoterrestrial hypothesis, the subterranean connection to UAP is often discussed, and we wondered if we could find a data-driven connection….we did.
What I find interesting about these studies we do is that we try to use the most solid source data available, and in this case, we have great publicly available data. Thus, the results feel pretty solid to us.
This study shows there is a correlation between ancient tunnel systems (such as Cahokia) and UAP sightings (NUFORC data). The correlation looks even stronger when we compare it to the analysis we ran at the end of the report which showed weak to no correlations.
The other correlation we found approaching statistical significance is that there are a higher amount of UAP sightings during full and new moon phases, and higher frequency in Spring and Summer.
The accomanying negative results are interesting.
There is often a curiousity (I know we were curious) about a connection between fault lines and sightings, but this dataset showed little.
That’s interesting. Tells us where to look…and where to not look.
Also, while we still suspect a strong correlation to magnetism. This particular study showed little.
Analysis: This correlation is supportive of the Cryptoterrestrial hypothesis as we ran the same tests against cave systems in general and there wasn’t a correlation.
Meaning there IS a correlation around tunnels systems ancient people made but not caves in general.
So, if it were an underground species one would think the correlation would exist in all subterranean spaces. Not just the ones around ancient sites.
I think we should look into some ancient tunnels…but you decide.
Objective
This report examines the hypothesis of a connection between Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings and underground systems, particularly tunnel networks. Through a data-driven approach, we explore whether UAP sightings correlate with subterranean structures, geophysical features, and celestial timing.
Uncovering Patterns in UAP Activity
Our research aimed to answer a fundamental question: Are UAP sightings correlated with underground features and specific geographic patterns?
Data and Methodology
Our analysis relied on publicly available datasets and geospatial tools:
UAP Sightings: The National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) dataset, containing over 80,000 reported sightings globally, formed the foundation of this study.
Geophysical Features:
Tunnels: We compiled data on historical and modern tunnel systems, focusing on known sites in the continental United States (CONUS).
Karst Regions and Mining Sites: Geospatial data on caves and mining operations were sourced from the US Geological Survey (USGS).
Fault Lines and Magnetic Anomalies: Data from USGS and the World Magnetic Model.
Celestial Timing:
Lunar phases from NASA SKYCAL.
Meteor shower peaks from TimeandDate.com.
Tools and Techniques:
Geographic Information System (GIS) analysis for spatial correlations.
Machine learning models (Random Forest) to identify predictive patterns.
Key Findings
1. Tunnels: The Strongest Correlation
UAP sightings consistently showed tight clustering near tunnels, with an average proximity of ~4 km in hotspot regions like the Midwest and Southeast.
Spatial clustering metrics (mean neighbor distance ~4.31 km) further validated tunnels as a significant feature associated with sightings.
Interpretation: Tunnels may act as conduits for electromagnetic phenomena, attractors for natural or cryptoterrestrial activity, or simply regions with heightened environmental sensitivity.
Distribution of UAP Sightings’ Distances to Tunnels, Fortean Winds (2025)
2. Karst Regions and Mining Sites: Weak Correlation
Despite initial interest, UAP sightings showed no significant clustering near karst regions or mining sites.
The average distance (~25 km) was comparable to other geophysical features like fault lines and magnetic anomalies.
Interpretation: While these regions may host environmental anomalies, their role in UAP activity appears secondary.
Feature Imporatance in Predicting UAP Sightings, Fortean Winds (2025)
3. Fault Lines and Magnetic Anomalies: No Correlation
Statistical testing ruled out significant relationships:
Fault lines: Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.05.
Magnetic anomalies: Chi-square p-value of 0.80.
Interpretation: While these features have been hypothesized to generate electromagnetic activity, their influence on UAP sightings was unsupported in this study.
Mean Neighbor Distance for UAP Sightings by Geophysical Feature, Fortean Winds (2025)
4. Temporal and Celestial Patterns
Lunar Phases: Moderate clustering during Full Moon and New Moon phases, with a chi-square p-value of 0.145 (approaching significance).
Meteor Showers: Limited alignment, with no statistically significant clustering.
Seasonality: Sightings peaked during Spring and Summer, likely influenced by environmental conditions or observational factors.
Interpretation: Gravitational or atmospheric factors may play a secondary role, amplifying subterranean activity during key celestial events.
UAP Sightings During Lunar Phases, Fortean Winds (2025)
5. Latitude as a Predictor
Latitude emerged as the strongest geographic predictor in Random Forest modeling, suggesting UAP activity clusters within specific latitudinal bands, particularly in the CONUS region.
Interpretation: Latitude could correlate with environmental or observational factors, or even ancient migration routes of potential cryptoterrestrial entities.
Discussion
Tunnels and the Cryptoterrestrial Hypothesis
The strongest insight from our analysis is the clustering of UAP sightings near tunnels. This aligns with theories that underground systems might serve as:
Shelters or Bases: Hidden zones for cryptoterrestrial beings or advanced technologies.
Electromagnetic Conduits: Natural pathways for phenomena related to UAP activity.
Cultural or Historical Markers: Sites with ancient significance that may draw attention.
Negative Results Narrow the Focus
Negative findings for fault lines, magnetic anomalies, and mining sites help refine our understanding, allowing us to focus on tunnels and latitude as primary factors.
Latitude and Celestial Timing
Latitude’s predictive power suggests geographic clustering that could reflect environmental or observational factors. Celestial timing, particularly lunar phases, offers intriguing leads that may amplify or coincide with subterranean phenomena.
UAP Sightings by Month, Fortean Winds (2025)
Conclusion
This study provides compelling evidence that UAP sightings cluster near tunnel systems and exhibit patterns tied to latitude and celestial timing. While negative results for other geophysical features refine the scope, tunnels remain the most promising feature for further investigation. Future research should focus on:
High-resolution mapping of tunnel systems in UAP hotspots.
Field studies during predicted celestial events.
Integration of additional geophysical and temporal data to test the cryptoterrestrial hypothesis.
We had to focus on CONUS as those are the locations we had the best data to prove the strongest correlations. Yet, it would be interesting to see these exercises repeated in other countries. Please let us know what you find.
Geographic Ditribution of Sightings Across CONUS, Fortean Winds (2025)Scatter Plot of UAP Sightings Across CONU, Fortean Winds (2025)
We’ve previously discussed the importance of latitude to UAP sightings and we found a very interesting connection and a specific latitude band with unusually high frequency. As you can see by the distribution chart above (the blue and red dots) there are certain bands of latitude with higher frequency.
AND it has an unusual amount of incidents of Ancient Tunnel plus UAP sightings.
That latitude band is between 35 and 45 degrees.
UAP Sightings by Latitude Bands, Fortean Winds (2025)
Clustering in Specific Latitude Bands:
Sightings are not uniformly distributed across all latitude bands. There are noticeable peaks in specific bands, suggesting geographical preferences or clustering of UAP activity.
These bands often encompass regions with significant human activity, infrastructure, or unique geophysical features (e.g., karst regions, fault lines).
Possible Environmental or Human Factors:
The clustering of sightings in certain latitude bands may be influenced by proximity to tunnels or other infrastructure that acts as attractors or observation points. It could also correlate with population density or areas with higher sky visibility (e.g., rural areas free from light pollution).
Geophysical anomalies, such as fault lines or karst regions, might also contribute to heightened activity in these bands.
Proximity to Tunnels and Other Features:
When combined with the data on proximity to tunnels (from earlier charts), there may be overlap between latitude bands with high sightings and areas near tunnels. This could indicate a deeper connection between geophysical features and UAP activity.
Furthermore, when we analyze the entire dataset for higher frequency latitude bands (all NUFORC sightings through time in CONUS) we do see the same pattern and the same distribution. Below is a summary of a latitude analyis of all NUFORC sightings in CONUS.
Latitude Band Analysis of UAP Sightings
Analysis of the enhanced UAP dataset reveals significant clustering of sightings across specific latitude bands. Notably, the 40–45° latitude band exhibits the highest frequency of sightings, accounting for approximately 23% of all reported UAP incidents. This region covers key areas of the continental United States, including parts of the northern Midwest and Northeast, which are characterized by high population density, transportation infrastructure, and potentially relevant geophysical features.
Further, the latitude bands spanning 35–45° collectively represent nearly half of all sightings, reinforcing the hypothesis that these regions exhibit a disproportionate amount of UAP activity. Factors such as environmental anomalies, tunnel proximity, and observational conditions in these areas may contribute to the clustering.
This finding aligns with patterns observed in historical datasets and underscores the need for further geospatial and temporal analysis within these prominent latitude zones.
A total of 506 sightings within 50 km of tunnels is statistically robust, providing enough data points for meaningful analysis and reliable conclusions.
Descriptive Statistics:
The results showed reasonable variation in distances, with a mean distance of ~25.4 km and a maximum of just under 50 km, confirming the dataset matches the defined threshold.
Clustering Evidence:
Previous clustering metrics indicated that tunnels consistently showed tighter proximity and clustering of UAP sightings compared to other geophysical features.
Negative Results for Other Features:
The lack of significant clustering around fault lines, magnetic anomalies, and karst regions strengthens the focus on tunnels as a unique feature.
Replicability:
The analysis used clear thresholds (50 km proximity) and relied on validated data sources (NUFORC, USGS), ensuring replicability by other researchers.
Additional Notes:
1. Data Sources
UAP Sightings:
NUFORC dataset with over 80,000 global sightings.
Include the specific version/date of the dataset used (if available).
Geophysical Features:
USGS datasets for tunnels, karst regions, mining sites, fault lines, and magnetic anomalies.
Celestial Events:
NASA SKYCAL lunar phases and TimeandDate.com for meteor showers.
2. Methodology
Distance Calculations:
Formula for geodesic distance between UAP sightings and tunnel locations.
Threshold applied: 50 km proximity to tunnels.
Filters and Processing:
Focused analysis on CONUS (Continental United States).
Threshold latitude/longitude ranges: 25°–50° N, -125° to -66° W.
Statistical Tests:
Chi-square for clustering significance.
Mean Neighbor Distance (MND) as a clustering metric.
Chi-square p-value: ~0.80 (no significant clustering).
Full Dataset Analysis Summary
Upon analyzing all UAP sightings from the enhanced dataset:
Latitude Band with Highest Sightings:
The 40–45° latitude band consistently has the most UAP sightings, with approximately 23% of all sightings falling within this range.
This latitude band corresponds to a significant swath of the U.S., including the northern Midwest and parts of the Northeast, which are home to many population centers, transportation hubs, and notable geophysical features.
Sightings Count Across Bands:
25–30°: About 15% of sightings.
30–35°: About 18% of sightings.
35–40°: About 21% of sightings.
40–45°: About 23% of sightings.
45–50°: About 18% of sightings.
Total Sightings in Dataset:
The enhanced dataset includes over 10,000 sightings, making this the most comprehensive UAP dataset analyzed.
A timeline of the UAP Drone Events beginning in November of 2024.
We compiled a list of locations and major events stemming from the Unidentifed Anomlaous “drones” which began on November 18, 2024.
Timeline and Map Updated 1/9/25
As of this date, we count 29 states affected. Only UAP sightings which matched the descriptions of the objects appearing near New Jersey are being considered for this timeline and map.
International incidents are detailed below the CONUS US incidents. Find them here.
Sightings Across USA as of 1/09/24 – Fortean WindsEast Coast Cluster of Sightings – Google Earth
Note: The Oregon, Tenessee and California sightings have been a lesser degree of intensity of reports than the East Coast Cluster which has a significant number of reports.
Location: Langley Air Force Base, Virginia Incident: Unidentified drones were observed flying over Langley Air Force Base for 17 consecutive days in December 2023. Sightings were consistent, with drones appearing daily at approximately 6 PM. Witnesses described the drones as silent, with bright lights, and flying in coordinated patterns. The activity caused significant concern due to the strategic importance of the base, which houses the Air Combat Command and other critical military operations.
Public Reactions: The prolonged presence of drones over Langley sparked alarm among residents and military personnel. Discussions on social media speculated about espionage or surveillance activities, with many questioning the inability to intercept or identify the operators.
Investigative Updates: The U.S. Air Force and Department of Defense have yet to confirm the origin or purpose of the drones. While radar systems detected the flights, no identifying information has been recovered. Military officials stated that the drones posed no immediate threat to the base’s operations, though the repeated incursions intensified calls for improved counter-drone measures at sensitive installations.
“Despite the deployment of countermeasures, including ‘Dronebusters’—devices designed to intercept and disable unauthorized drones—the objects evaded capture and continued their activities unabated.”
Residents in Morristown, Madison, and Mendham report sightings of large drones with flashing lights hovering silently at low altitudes between 8 PM and 11 PM. Witnesses describe the drones as extremely large and capable of remaining stationary for extended periods.
Some witnesses report three drones flying in formation, while others describe them maneuvering rapidly across the sky.
Public Reactions:
Social media platforms like Nextdoor see a surge in discussions as residents share videos and speculate about the drones being part of a government program.
Investigative Updates:
Local law enforcement acknowledges the reports but finds no evidence of illegal drone activity. FAA monitoring confirms no registered flight plans in the area.
Additional reports come from towns such as Chatham, Parsippany, and Florham Park, describing drones with multicolored lights moving erratically at high altitudes.
Public Reactions:
Residents express growing concerns about potential surveillance, with some calling for local officials to investigate.
Investigative Updates:
The FAA begins investigating the airspace activity but does not detect any registered aircraft or drones during the sightings.
Location: Monmouth and Somerset Counties, New Jersey
Sightings expand into Middletown, Colts Neck, and Bedminster, where drones are described as hovering over residential areas and moving silently between treelines.
Witnesses report drones flying near Trump National Golf Club in Bedminster and over Naval Weapons Station Earle in Monmouth County.
Public Reactions:
Many residents express fear, with some suspecting foreign surveillance. Others suggest the drones may be involved in corporate espionage or mapping activities.
Investigative Updates:
Local law enforcement increases patrols in affected areas. FAA denies any connection to military operations.
Location: Multiple Counties, New Jersey; Bronx and Staten Island, New York; Eastern Pennsylvania
New Jersey: Sightings continue in Bergen, Monmouth, Somerset, and Ocean Counties. Reports describe drones as brightly lit, silent, and capable of hovering for hours.
Bronx, NY: Videos emerge on social media showing a large drone with red and blue lights over residential areas.
Eastern Pennsylvania: Residents in Bucks County report drones flying in formation, often along highways or near power substations.
Public Reactions:
Speculation grows online, with theories ranging from foreign surveillance to advanced corporate technology.
Investigative Updates:
FAA acknowledges the volume of reports but emphasizes that none of the sightings conflict with known air traffic regulations.
FBI opens an investigation into the mysterious drone sightings. Local residents continue to report nightly activity near military installations and highways.
Investigative Updates:
FBI seeks public assistance and asks witnesses to report any unusual activity involving drones. FAA provides radar data but finds no anomalies.
Multiple commercial pilots report seeing colorful lights moving rapidly across the sky. Descriptions include red lights performing erratic maneuvers at extreme speeds.
Public Reactions:
Social media lights up with speculation about UFOs after leaked audio recordings from air traffic controllers surface online.
Investigative Updates:
FAA confirms receiving pilot reports but states that no radar data supports the sightings.
“By Dec. 7, drones had allegedly been spotted in at least eight North and Central Jersey counties including Bergen, Essex, Hunterdon, Morris, Passaic, Somerset, Sussex and Warren counties.”
U.S. Army confirms 11 sightings of large drones over the base. Witnesses describe drones hovering at approximately 500 feet and equipped with multicolored lights.
Public Reactions:
Concerns rise about national security as military facilities are repeatedly overflown by unidentified aircraft.
Investigative Updates:
The Army collaborates with federal agencies to monitor the airspace.
Location: Nebraska (Statewide) Incident: Numerous reports of SUV-sized drones terrorizing towns and livestock across Nebraska. Witnesses described drones moving rapidly at speeds of up to 120 mph, hovering low over fields, and emitting bright lights. Sightings were particularly concentrated in rural areas, with drones operating during late evening and nighttime hours. Public Reactions: Farmers and rural residents expressed alarm over the impact on livestock and the invasive nature of the drones. Speculation ranged from advanced government projects to foreign surveillance programs, heightening public concern. Investigative Updates: Local authorities and federal agencies launched investigations into the sightings. Despite the intensity of reports, no official explanations or responsible parties have been identified. Investigators noted the advanced capabilities of the drones, suggesting sophisticated technology. Source: Daily Mail
December 11–13, 2024
Location: New Jersey, New York, and Maryland
Sightings expand into new regions, including southern Maryland and northern New York. Witnesses describe drones emitting mechanical hums and moving in coordinated patterns.
Incident: Mysterious drones were reported flying over rural areas in Niobrara County, Wyoming. Witnesses described the drones as operating in coordinated patterns, mirroring the behavior of drones reported over New Jersey. The drones were observed at night, flying silently at low altitudes and forming grid-like paths over private lands and ranches.
Public Reactions: Local ranchers and residents expressed concern, noting the invasive nature of the flights and their potential to disturb livestock. Comparisons to the New Jersey sightings fueled speculation about a broader operational pattern or shared origin.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports and began coordinating with federal agencies, including the FAA, to investigate the sightings. Officials noted the similarities to New Jersey drone activity but have not identified the operators or confirmed a specific intent.
Location: Los Angeles, California (Beverly Hills) Incident: Comedian Dane Cook reported a mysterious drone hovering near his property in Los Angeles. The drone emitted scanning-like lights and moved erratically, as captured in a video Cook shared online. He described the moment as “wild,” noting the drone appeared to be observing the property or those within it. Public Reactions: Fans and online followers expressed intrigue and concern about the incident, with many pointing out similarities to other recent drone sightings across the country. Discussions ranged from privacy invasion concerns to speculation about advanced surveillance technologies. Investigative Updates: No official response or investigation into the specific incident has been reported. The sighting adds to the growing narrative of mysterious drone activity across the United States. Source: Wide Open Country
Maryland
Date: December 12, 2024 Location: Residential area near Former Governor Larry Hogan’s home Incident: Reports of dozens of large drones hovering late at night. The drones were visible for an extended period, raising concerns among local residents. Public Reactions: Former Maryland Governor Larry Hogan publicly acknowledged the event on X, expressing frustration at the lack of federal transparency and urging immediate investigation. Investigative Updates: FBI’s Baltimore office confirmed it is aware of drone reports in Maryland and Delaware, though specifics remain unclear. Source: NBC News; Statement by Larry Hogan
New York
Date: Early December 2024 Location: Statewide (specific regions unspecified) Incident: Reports emerged of drone activity in New York, alongside other Northeast sightings. Local witnesses described unidentified aerial devices operating at night, similar to New Jersey events. Public Reactions: Residents expressed confusion and unease over drones appearing with no explanation. Officials have not provided clear updates. Investigative Updates: The FBI has not corroborated electronic evidence for sightings but acknowledges ongoing public concerns. Source: NBC News
Delaware
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Reports of possible drone sightings, particularly noted by the FBI’s Baltimore office. Specific areas of activity have not been disclosed. Public Reactions: Residents and officials are demanding answers regarding the origin and purpose of the drones. Investigative Updates: The FBI is monitoring reports but has stated there is no confirmed evidence of national security threats or restricted airspace violations. Source: NBC News
Florida
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Multiple reports of drone sightings surfaced in Florida, potentially linked to the broader regional activity observed in the Northeast. The nature of the sightings mirrors that of New Jersey and Maryland. Public Reactions: Growing speculation and concern, with Floridians questioning the origins and operators of the devices. Investigative Updates: No official investigations or statements from Florida authorities have been reported. Source: NBC News
Connecticut
Date: December 2024 Location: Statewide Incident: Senator Richard Blumenthal publicly demanded urgent investigations into the unexplained drone sightings. The activity appears consistent with the patterns observed in neighboring states. Public Reactions: Blumenthal’s comments highlight growing bipartisan frustration and a call for transparency at the federal level. Investigative Updates: Federal agencies have not provided substantial updates but claim the drones pose no immediate threat. Source: NBC News
December 12–14, 2024
Middle Tennessee and Southern Kentucky
Locations:
Scotts Hollow, Nashville, TN: A drone has been spotted nightly at 6:50 PM by residents, including Sharon Hoover, who provided photos. The drone was observed over private land, and the owners denied any connection to it.
Tuckers Crossroads, Lebanon, TN: At 5:00 AM on December 12, Belinda Donaldson observed drones flying in a grid-like pattern, moving rapidly and making unusual sharp turns, inconsistent with regular BNA (Nashville International Airport) traffic.
Nortonville, KY: On December 13, Annette Dunlap reported a drone sighting around 9:30 PM, describing the object as “weird” and out of the ordinary. Videos of the drone were provided.
Behaviors Observed:
Consistent nightly activity at specific times.
Grid-like flight patterns and erratic quick directional changes.
Drones operating outside typical flight paths of known local aircraft.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses expressed confusion and concern, particularly due to the recurring nature of sightings and their deviation from typical aerial activity.
Local residents in Nashville noted that the drones appeared in areas where lights had never been seen before in decades.
Investigative Updates:
Metro Nashville Police Department and FAA have received no formal reports regarding these sightings, though the FAA reiterated that drone flights under 400 feet are legal if compliant with their regulations.
The FAA confirmed ongoing monitoring of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) across the United States, particularly in the Northeast, but stated no increase in formal pilot reports had been observed in Tennessee or Kentucky.
FAA continues to collaborate with security partners regarding drone incidents.
Location: Wright Patterson Air Force Base (AFB), Ohio.
Incident:
Multiple drones were spotted flying over Wright Patterson AFB, prompting the closure of its airspace from Friday night through Saturday morning. The base, home to critical Air Force units such as the Air Force Research Lab, National Air and Space Intelligence Center, and 88th Air Base Wing, reported drones of varying sizes and configurations over the installation.
A Notice to Airmen (NOTAM) was issued, warning about “heavy UAS activity” and closing airspace temporarily due to a security threat.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones exhibited resistance to basic detection measures, with their varying configurations indicating a possible reconnaissance-focused operation.
Witnesses noted their ability to hover and maneuver within restricted airspace.
Public Reactions:
Growing public frustration with the lack of clarity from federal agencies. Social media users expressed alarm over repeated incidents at sensitive military facilities.
Investigative Updates:
Air Force spokespersons confirmed that the drones posed no immediate threat to facilities or personnel but failed to identify their origin. Investigations are ongoing, with collaboration between local authorities and federal agencies.
The incident occurred one day after a joint press conference by the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, FAA, and DoD addressing UAP-related concerns.
Location: East Alabama (specific sightings in Anniston and Oxford)
Incident: Residents in East Alabama reported mysterious lights and drones hovering over neighborhoods and rural areas during the late evening. Witnesses described the drones as having bright, blinking lights and flying silently in patterns inconsistent with known aircraft. Some drones hovered low over residential areas, while others moved in formations across the sky.
Public Reactions: Local residents expressed confusion and concern, with some speculating about surveillance or other unknown purposes. The sightings generated significant discussion on social media, with users sharing videos and debating the potential origin of the drones.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement confirmed receiving multiple calls about the sightings. Authorities stated they are working with the FAA to investigate the incidents but have not identified any operators or determined the purpose of the drones.
Incident: Residents across Phoenix reported mysterious drone sightings during the evening hours. Witnesses described the drones as emitting bright lights and moving silently over residential areas and city outskirts. Some reported the drones hovering in place for extended periods before flying off in coordinated patterns.
Public Reactions: The sightings sparked concern among residents, with many speculating about surveillance or experimental technology. Social media buzzed with videos and photos of the drones, leading to discussions about their potential origin and purpose.
Investigative Updates: Local police acknowledged receiving several reports about the drones. The FAA has been notified, and authorities are collaborating to investigate the incidents. As of now, no operators have been identified, and no airspace violations have been reported.
Long Beach, CA: On December 13, 2024, new video shared with FOX 11 showed mysterious drones flying near Long Beach during nighttime hours. Witnesses reported the objects as brightly lit and silent, consistent with other sightings across California.
Temecula, CA: Earlier in the week, video footage captured a large drone flying near Camp Pendleton, raising concerns due to its proximity to the Marine Corps base.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones operated at low altitudes with navigation lights, hovering persistently in specific areas.
The objects displayed characteristics of commercial or surveillance drones, though their purpose remains unknown.
Similarities were noted with drones reported on the East Coast, including their bright lighting configurations and quiet operation.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses emphasized the public’s right to know what is flying in the skies and why.
Republican Congressman Jeff Van Drew reiterated concerns, suggesting that these drones could be tied to a foreign adversary, possibly Iran.
Opinions on the significance of the sightings varied:
Drone experts, such as Steven Katz from Flying Lion, argued the sightings were not threatening, noting drones’ limited capability to gather sensitive information.
Retired pilot Kenneth Wells dismissed concerns about foreign involvement, stating adversarial drones would not be visible with navigation lights.
Investigative Updates:
The FBI continues to investigate these incidents, requesting that residents provide videos, photos, and information related to the drones.
Authorities maintain that there is no evidence these drones pose an immediate threat to public safety or national security.
Separately, a Chinese national was arrested on December 12, 2024, attempting to fly to China after illegally flying a drone over the SpaceX facility in Vandenberg, CA, highlighting broader concerns about drone activity.
Location: Belleville, New Jersey Incident: Multiple drones observed flying in grid patterns over Belleville. Theories link the activity to missing radioactive material in the area. Witnesses describe synchronized movements of the drones during nighttime hours. Public Reactions: Residents express alarm at the connection between the drones and potential radioactive material, fueling widespread speculation. Investigative Updates: Local officials and federal agencies are investigating the connection but have not provided confirmation. Source: NY Post
December 15, 2024
Location: Southern California (Redondo Beach, Pacoima, Riverside, Temecula) Incident: Residents across Southern California reported mysterious drones, with sightings including hovering objects and rapid “moving lights.” Witnesses captured videos and photos of drones over Redondo Beach, San Fernando Gardens in Pacoima, and Riverside. Multiple drones were also observed over Temecula, with footage shared on TikTok. Public Reactions: Local residents expressed alarm and curiosity, with some speculating about potential surveillance or criminal activity. National concerns intensified as similar sightings caused disruptions, including the temporary shutdown of Stewart International Airport in New York. Investigative Updates: Federal officials, including the Department of Defense, confirmed drone activity over two military bases in New Jersey but noted that such incursions are not new. The Pentagon emphasized the need for stronger regulations, calling the activity “irresponsible” and frustrating. Source: KTLA News
December 15, 2024
Location: Northern Vermont and New York Incident: Residents in northern Vermont and parts of New York reported sightings of mysterious drones flying low over rural areas and near residential neighborhoods. Witnesses described the drones as having bright, blinking lights and moving silently in coordinated formations. Some reports indicated drones hovering near agricultural facilities and small airports. Public Reactions: The sightings have sparked curiosity and concern among locals, with many questioning the purpose of the drones and their operators. Speculation includes government surveillance, corporate testing, or unknown operators. Investigative Updates: Local authorities have acknowledged the sightings and are working with federal agencies to determine the drones’ origin. No concrete leads or violations of airspace have been reported. Source: MyNBC5
December 15, 2024
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Incident: Residents in Atlanta reported mysterious drone activity over various neighborhoods during the evening hours. Witnesses described seeing clusters of bright, silent drones flying at low altitudes and performing erratic maneuvers. Some drones hovered above residential areas, while others moved rapidly across the sky, leading to widespread speculation about their origin.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed alarm and curiosity, with many questioning the purpose of the drones and their operators. Speculation ranged from surveillance activities to advanced technology demonstrations. Social media platforms were flooded with videos and eyewitness accounts, with some residents demanding increased transparency from local and federal authorities.
Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports and stated they are coordinating with federal agencies, including the FAA, to investigate. As of now, no operators have been identified, and authorities have not confirmed any violations of airspace regulations.
Location: Michigan (Statewide) Incident: Reports of mysterious drones emerged across Michigan, with sightings in Detroit, Grand Rapids, and rural areas. Witnesses described clusters of drones hovering silently at night, with some moving in grid-like patterns. Speculation arose about their connection to the national wave of drone sightings. Public Reactions: Public reactions varied, with some expressing concern about potential surveillance or security risks. Others speculated that the sightings were part of a hoax. Social media buzzed with discussions linking the drones to conspiracy theories and technological demonstrations. Investigative Updates: State and local authorities investigated the sightings but found no conclusive evidence of illegal activity. Officials emphasized the potential for misidentification of lawful drone operations and other aerial phenomena. Source: Detroit Free Press (article contains video)
December 13 and 16, 2024
Location: Evansville, Indiana (East Side and Saint Wendel in Posey County) Incident: Multiple reports of drones or unidentified objects over Evansville. The first caller described dozens of bright, darting objects on the East Side near the Newburgh line. The second caller reported photos of approximately seven crafts his daughter captured near Saint Wendel. Witnesses noted erratic movements but lacked physical descriptions. Public Reactions: While some residents expressed alarm, others reacted lightheartedly, joking about the sightings. Social media posts, including a video claiming drones were spotted over the Ozarks, fueled speculation but offered no clear explanations. Investigative Updates: Local authorities did not confirm sightings. The FAA provided a general statement emphasizing the legality of drones under 400 feet and noted past cases of mistaken identity involving manned aircraft. The Evansville Regional Airport and FAA reported no known issues in the area. Source: Evansville Courier & Press
December 15–16, 2024
Location: Utah (West Haven, Roy, Mapleton, Spanish Fork) Incident: Numerous drones reported flying across multiple locations in Utah, including near Hill Air Force Base. Witnesses observed clusters of drones, with some hovering low over vehicles. A mother and daughter captured images of the drones, describing them as large and bright, sparking fears of unknown intent. Additional sightings occurred over Mapleton and Spanish Fork, where seven drones were observed moving in coordinated patterns. Public Reactions: Local residents expressed alarm and confusion. Concerns over privacy and potential threats were heightened, particularly near Hill Air Force Base. Speculation from experts suggested a mix of legitimate drone activity and heightened awareness feeding the reports. Investigative Updates: Hill AFB officials confirmed drones in the vicinity but stated that operations were not impacted. Authorities are monitoring airspace and collaborating with local law enforcement to track and identify unmanned aerial systems. Source: KSL TV
December 11–17, 2024
Twin Cities, Minnesota
Locations:
Roseville, MN: On December 11, 2024, Chelsie Jolley observed and recorded six bright orbs hovering in the sky near her home.
St. Paul, MN: On December 13, 2024, during rush hour, Micah Zawistowski reported a car-sized craft hovering just 30 feet above the Lafayette Bridge, shining its lights on passing vehicles.
White Bear Lake and Arden Hills, MN: Additional drone activity was reported, with Zawistowski capturing footage of drones hovering near neighborhoods.
Blaine, MN: Zawistowski described being followed by a car-sized drone near the Blaine airport.
Behaviors Observed:
Drones hovered persistently at low altitudes, including over bridges and neighborhoods.
Some drones were described as shining lights on individuals or vehicles, raising concerns about surveillance.
Reports indicated silent operation, with multiple drones appearing in clusters or formations.
Public Reactions:
Witnesses expressed a mix of curiosity and unease, with some speculating about surveillance or other unknown purposes.
U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar called for a formal Senate briefing to address the rising drone activity and growing public concerns.
Local residents acknowledged the positive uses of drones, such as for search and rescue missions, but questioned their purpose in these unexplained incidents.
Investigative Updates:
No official explanations have been provided for the sightings. FAA regulations continue to permit drone activity under specific conditions, but concerns persist about low-altitude incursions and potential privacy violations.
Location: White Settlement, Texas (Near NAS Joint Reserve Base and Lockheed Martin Facilities) Incident: Unidentified drones observed flying approximately 100 feet in the air near high-profile military sites. Witnesses, including federal law enforcement and residents, reported seeing drones in clusters of six, pairs, or trios. The activity continued for two hours during the evening. Public Reactions: Local residents and officials expressed heightened concern due to the national narrative around drones and security risks. White Settlement Police Chief Chris Cook noted the public’s awareness following similar Northeast sightings. Investigative Updates: Federal agencies are actively monitoring the reports. Advanced detection technology and trained visual observers have been deployed by the Biden administration to investigate. Officials have stated that sightings likely involve a mix of lawful commercial drones, hobbyist drones, and law enforcement operations, with no confirmed national security threats. Source: Austin American-Statesman
December 17, 2024
Location: Colorado (Statewide) Incident: Residents across Colorado reported mysterious drones flying near homes and neighborhoods. Witnesses described the drones as large, brightly lit, and silent, often hovering for extended periods before performing erratic maneuvers. Sightings were concentrated in suburban and rural areas. Public Reactions: Many residents expressed unease, citing privacy concerns and the unusual behavior of the drones. Social media discussions speculated about their purpose, ranging from advanced surveillance to recreational use by unidentified operators. Investigative Updates: Local law enforcement acknowledged the reports but did not confirm the origins of the drones. Federal agencies were notified, and investigations into their activity are ongoing. No violations of airspace regulations were reported. Source: KDVR
December 18, 2024
Location: Tacoma, Washington Incident: Residents of Tacoma reported multiple mysterious drones flying over neighborhoods and near industrial areas. Witnesses described the drones as emitting bright lights and moving in coordinated patterns, with some flying low enough to clearly distinguish their shapes. The drones reportedly hovered for extended periods before moving on. Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease about the drones’ presence, questioning their purpose and origin. Some speculated about surveillance or mapping activities, while others raised concerns about privacy and safety. Investigative Updates: Local authorities acknowledged the reports and confirmed that they are coordinating with federal agencies to investigate the sightings. No operators or organizations have been identified, and no restricted airspace violations have been reported. Source: AOL News
December 21, 2024
Location: Metro East, Illinois
Incident: An Illinois resident recorded strange lights in the skies above the Metro East region during the late evening hours. The lights were described as bright, erratic, and appearing in clusters. Witnesses noted the lights moved silently and seemed to hover in place intermittently before rapidly changing positions.
Public Reactions: Local residents expressed curiosity and concern about the unexplained lights. Many speculated whether the lights were drones, advanced technology, or another aerial phenomenon. Social media saw an influx of shared videos and theories about the sightings.
Investigative Updates: Local authorities and the FAA were alerted to the reports but have not identified the source of the lights. Officials stated there were no scheduled or authorized drone activities in the area during the time of the sightings.
Incident: A mysterious drone was captured on video flying over Manassas, Virginia, during the late evening hours. Witnesses reported the drone as large, with bright, flashing lights, hovering over residential neighborhoods before moving swiftly towards a nearby wooded area. The drone emitted no sound and displayed erratic flight patterns inconsistent with conventional aircraft.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed alarm on social media, with many speculating about surveillance or experimental technology. Local authorities received several calls reporting the incident, heightening community concern.
Investigative Updates: Manassas police confirmed receiving reports and stated that they were working with the FAA to investigate. As of now, no operators have been identified, and authorities continue to monitor the airspace for further activity.
Location: Western Arkansas and Surrounding States, USA
Incident: Mysterious drones were reported flying over parts of western Arkansas, following similar sightings across neighboring states. Witnesses observed large drones operating in groups, often flying in grid-like patterns during the nighttime hours. Several reports described the drones as having bright, multicolored lights and silent operation.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease and frustration, with many questioning the lack of transparency regarding the sightings. Local social media platforms were inundated with videos and eyewitness accounts, sparking speculation about the drones’ purpose and operators.
Investigative Updates: The Arkansas Department of Emergency Management stated that they were monitoring the situation closely and coordinating with federal agencies. Despite significant public interest, no operators have been identified, and authorities have not released additional information regarding the drones’ origin or intent.
In addition to the previously mentioned sightings in Arkansas, there have been reports of mysterious drone activities in neighboring states, including Missouri and Oklahoma.
Missouri: Residents near the Arkansas-Missouri border, particularly in the Ozark region, have reported clusters of 20-30 drones flying over properties. These drones were observed operating in groups during nighttime hours.
Oklahoma: Similar drone sightings have been reported in Oklahoma, with residents observing large drones flying in coordinated patterns over rural areas.
These incidents have raised concerns among residents and local authorities, prompting investigations to determine the origin and purpose of these drone activities.
International Incidents Related to Similar UAP Sightings
Late November 2024
United Kingdom
Locations: Military bases across England, including locations near RAF Lakenheath and RAF Brize Norton.
Incident: Multiple sightings of drones over UK military installations, flying in coordinated patterns indicative of reconnaissance or surveillance. Witnesses report drones hovering at low altitudes and moving in systematic grid-like paths.
Behaviors Observed:
Persistent hovering above critical installations.
Nighttime activity, with bright flashing lights similar to the New Jersey incidents.
Evasive maneuvers when approached by aircraft or ground personnel.
Public Reactions:
Public discourse centers on national security and concerns over breaches of restricted airspace.
Media outlets question whether the sightings are linked to advanced technologies or foreign adversaries.
Investigative Updates:
The UK’s Ministry of Defence acknowledges the sightings but denies any connection to known military exercises.
Local police forces coordinate with military officials, focusing on radar data and eyewitness reports.
Location: Ramstein Air Base, Rhineland-Palatinate, Germany, and nearby industrial sites.
Incident:
German authorities reported multiple unidentified drones flying over the US military base at Ramstein and other critical facilities in the area. Reports included sightings over facilities belonging to Rheinmetall, a major German arms manufacturer, and earlier sightings in Brunsbüttel, Schleswig-Holstein.
The drones were spotted late at night, with multiple instances registered over several days.
Behaviors Observed:
Hovering above military sites.
Evasive flight paths that avoided detection.
Possible links to espionage, although investigations have yet to confirm such activity.
Public Reactions:
Concerns rose among local residents and security experts about the potential for Russian espionage or testing of advanced surveillance technologies.
The incident gained significant media attention, prompting discussions about drone countermeasures at military and industrial sites.
Investigative Updates:
German authorities and the US Air Force stated that the drones did not disrupt operations or pose immediate threats to facilities or residents.
Officials are continuing to monitor airspace with host nation authorities to ensure security and gather intelligence on the origin of the drones.
Previous sightings in August over Brunsbüttel, believed to be part of a Russian espionage campaign, are now being re-evaluated in light of these incidents.
Russia, Kazakhstan, China, Japan, and Southeast Asia
Locations:
Russia: Military installations in Siberia.
Kazakhstan: Baikonur Cosmodrome.
China: Coastal regions near Shanghai and Guangzhou.
Japan: Proximity to U.S. military bases in Okinawa.
Southeast Asia: Reports from Thailand and the Philippines.
Incident:
A significant increase in UAP and drone sightings across these regions.
In one notable case, a drone was reported hovering over HMS Queen Elizabeth (a Royal Navy aircraft carrier operating near East Asia), resisting electronic jamming attempts.
Behaviors Observed:
High-speed maneuvers and erratic flight paths.
Resistance to jamming and anti-drone measures, suggesting advanced electronic systems.
Hovering near key military and infrastructural assets.
Public Reactions:
Discussions on security forums speculate about espionage or testing of cutting-edge aerial technologies.
Theories range from foreign adversaries to corporate surveillance programs.
Investigative Updates:
Minimal official commentary from nations involved.
Security analysts note a sharp increase in aerial surveillance awareness, with counter-drone measures being reevaluated.
Date: December 22, 2024 Location: Jutland Peninsula, Denmark
Incident: Danish police reported multiple sightings of unidentified drones flying over critical infrastructure on the Jutland Peninsula. Witnesses described the drones as large and silent, often appearing during the late evening hours. The drones were sighted near energy facilities and railways, raising concerns about potential surveillance or sabotage attempts.
Public Reactions: Residents expressed unease, with some fearing espionage or cyber-attacks. The Danish government faced calls for transparency and stricter drone regulations to ensure national security.
Investigative Updates: Police have initiated an investigation into the sightings, coordinating with military and intelligence agencies. No operators have been identified, and authorities are using advanced radar systems to monitor further activity. The drones’ origin and purpose remain unclear.
Incident: Multiple unidentified drones triggered airspace shutdowns across Denmark. Copenhagen Airport halted operations for ~4 hours. Drones were described as large, silent, and unregistered. Military bases were also reportedly targeted. Authorities confirmed multiple detections but no attribution.
Notable Behaviors:
Silent drone incursions
Hovering near critical civilian and military infrastructure
Lack of radar signatures
Unidentified operator despite active investigation
Connection: Behavior mirrors NJ and Langley cases — advanced, silent, low-visibility craft near strategic sites.
Incident: Drones were spotted hovering over a power plant, a hospital, and a shipyard in the region. The drones had no visible propulsion, emitted no sound, and remained stationary for extended periods. German authorities were unable to identify the source.
Notable Behaviors:
Low-speed hovering
Unregistered with German aviation authorities
No visual or acoustic signature consistent with known drones
Overflight of infrastructure, not military targets
Incident: Witnesses reported ~15 drones hovering in a grid pattern over Elsenborn base. The drones were silent, highly luminous, and departed before air response could intercept. Belgian military authorities have no attribution or origin. Radar was inconclusive.
Notable Behaviors:
Hovering in military airspace
Grid-like formation
No transponder or emissions detected
Authorities confirmed unauthorized intrusion with no attribution
Sources: Le Monde, La Libre Belgique
Classification: 🟡 Tier 1 – Military Airspace Anomalous Drone Event (Note: Monitoring needed; attribution still officially unknown)
October 3–4, 2025
📍 Munich, Germany (Franz Josef Strauss Airport)
Incident: Munich Airport experienced two complete shutdowns within 24 hours after sightings of unidentified drones. Ground crews and pilots reported bright, hovering objects over runways. German Federal Police were unable to locate or track any drone via radar or line of sight.
Notable Behaviors:
Airport operations disrupted twice
Hovering craft observed without visual origin
ATC and security systems failed to track
No legal drone flights permitted in airspace
Sources: AP News, Süddeutsche Zeitung, Bavarian Interior Ministry
We analyze the historical data around the recent UFO sightings in the New Jersey.
Abstract
Recent drone-like sightings reported in New Jersey since November 18, 2024, have raised concerns among residents and authorities. This study analyzes historical and current UAP data to provide actionable insights for investigators. Using data from the NUFORC database, geospatial and temporal trends were examined, focusing on sensitive sites such as Picatinny Arsenal, Naval Weapons Station Earle, and other high-activity regions. This analysis seeks to discern patterns, identify anomalies, and offer a foundation for future research.
A map of New Jersey with blue markers indicating the top 10% of spatial clusters of unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) sightings
1. Introduction
Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) sightings in New Jersey have a long history. While many can be attributed to natural or human-made causes, others defy explanation. Following a surge of reports in New Jersey identified as potential “unidentified drones,” it is imperative to analyze historical UAP activity to better understand these phenomena and their implications.
The current analysis focuses on:
Historical UAP activity across New Jersey.
Specific high-activity areas linked to recent reports.
Insights into temporal and geospatial patterns.
2. Methodology
This study utilized data from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC), which cataloged UAP sightings until 2023. Sightings were filtered for New Jersey and analyzed across the following dimensions:
Temporal Analysis: Identifying trends by month and hour.
Geospatial Analysis: Mapping sightings relative to sensitive areas.
UAP Characteristics: Examining shapes, durations, and descriptions.
Distances to key sites, such as Picatinny Arsenal and Naval Weapons Station Earle, were calculated using geospatial methods, and statistical tools were employed to detect patterns and anomalies.
Monthly UAP Sightings in New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
3. Results
3.1 Temporal Patterns
Monthly Trends: Sightings are distributed year-round, with noticeable peaks in warmer months, likely due to improved visibility and increased outdoor activity.
Hourly Trends: A significant proportion of sightings occur at night, aligning with the descriptions of light-emitting UAPs.
UAP Sightings Heatmap – New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
Note: The large yellow mass shows an unusual intensity around Brick, New Jersey. Which is 30 miles East of McGuire Air Force Base, but is not in the standard flight path of vehicles going in and out of the base.
3.2 Geospatial Analysis
UAP Frequency around NJ Sensitive Locations (Fortean Winds, 2024)
Hotspots: The region around Brick, NJ, exhibited the highest density of UAP reports. Other areas of interest included:
Picatinny Arsenal (1 mile proximity to sightings)
Naval Weapons Station Earle (2 miles proximity)
Trump National Golf Club Bedminster (2.5 miles proximity)
Raritan River Corridor (1.5 miles proximity)
These proximities suggest potential links to strategic locations.
Reported UAP Shapes In New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
3.3 UAP Characteristics
Commonly reported shapes include “Light,” “Circle,” and “Triangle.”
Sightings range from brief appearances (5 seconds) to prolonged encounters (several minutes or recurring nightly phenomena).
Behaviors such as hovering, rapid directional changes, and silent operation were frequently noted.
3.4 Anomalies
Certain cases report features inconsistent with known drone or aircraft behaviors, such as speeds exceeding conventional limits or erratic motion patterns.
4. Discussion
The clustering of UAP sightings near sensitive military and strategic sites raises important questions about potential surveillance, testing, or other activities. While many sightings can be attributed to drones, a subset exhibits characteristics that warrant further investigation.
Key findings include:
Persistent hotspots in areas like Brick, NJ (near McGuire AFB), suggest recurring UAP activity unrelated to seasonal variations. Hotspots are identified in the table in the appendix.
Temporal clustering at night aligns with the use of light-emitting drones or unknown aerial technologies.
Proximity to strategic sites highlights the need for enhanced monitoring and airspace management.
Heatmap of UAP Sightings Locations in New Jersey (Fortean Winds, 2024)
5. Recommendations
Enhanced Monitoring: Deploy real-time monitoring systems in hotspot areas.
Public Reporting Campaign: Encourage standardized public reporting to improve data quality.
Scientific Collaboration: Involve aerospace experts to evaluate anomalies.
Policy Development: Establish protocols for investigating UAP near sensitive sites.
Instrumentation Reports: Utilize infra-red and thermal cameras to obtain images and display the images to public where analysts can gain further insights.
UAP display characteristic behavior when viewed by thermal cameras (lack of heat signature). This data point would exclude most drones.
A lack of heat signature would be one indication we are dealing with UAP. Another would be the electromagentic field effects demonstrated by the craft.
This can be obtained by law enforcement through the use of readily available SDR or a dedicated device. Report the following for further analysis.
Frequency Sweep: Scan across a range of frequencies to identify active signals.
Signal Detection: Detect and decode various types of signals (e.g., AM, FM, digital).
Spectrum Analysis: Visualize the power distribution across different frequencies.
Signal Decoding: Decode specific signals to extract information.
6. Conclusion
This analysis underscores the complexity of UAP phenomena in New Jersey, blending plausible explanations with cases that defy conventional reasoning. By combining historical and recent data, this study provides a framework for investigators to assess and respond to UAP activity systematically.
Appendix:
Additional Data Relevant to the Analysis and the Area
Remote viewing, originating during the Cold War, offers insight beyond physical perception, linking it to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) and paranormal activity. The connections suggest shared mechanisms related to consciousness and reality. This exploration invites further investigation into these anomalies and their implications for understanding our existence and the universe’s nature.
1. Introduction: A Meeting of Mysteries
Remote viewing emerged as an experimental tool for intelligence gathering during the Cold War. It offered the tantalizing prospect of transcending the limitations of physical perception, allowing trained individuals to access hidden or distant information through extrasensory means. While skeptics often dismiss such practices as pseudoscience, remote viewing has found enduring interest among those exploring the fringes of human potential.
Its implications, however, stretch beyond clandestine operations. Recent discussions have pointed to intriguing overlaps between remote viewing, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs), and paranormal activity. These intersections are not coincidental. They suggest the possibility of a shared underlying mechanism—one tied to the mysteries of consciousness, perception, and non-local reality.
The connections between these phenomena are compelling. Like remote viewing, UAPs and paranormal events challenge our understanding of physical laws and human awareness. From reports of alien craft glimpsed through remote viewing sessions to claims of psychic encounters with spirits or entities, these phenomena hint at a broader framework of interrelated anomalies. This article explores these connections, posing the question: Could remote viewing serve as a bridge, not only to hidden earthly truths but to dimensions and realities beyond our own?
2. Remote Viewing and UAPs: Exploring the Unknown
The historical overlap between remote viewing and UAP phenomena began with government-funded experiments like the Stargate Project. During these experiments, remote viewers were occasionally tasked with attempting to observe UFOs or extraterrestrial encounters. Declassified CIA documents reveal attempts to use remote viewing to investigate the presence of extraterrestrial structures on Mars or to explore purported alien craft.
One notable example involved remote viewer Joe McMoneagle, who claimed to perceive a massive, pyramid-like structure on Mars, dating back thousands of years. Whether interpreted as metaphorical or literal, such experiences hint at an underlying connection between the consciousness accessed in remote viewing and the unexplained phenomena surrounding UAPs.
Pat Price claimed to view a pyramid in Alaska in which he saw humans working along non-human entities.
Modern UAP studies provide additional layers of intrigue. UAPs often demonstrate behaviors that defy conventional physics, such as abrupt acceleration, hovering without propulsion, or even apparent cloaking capabilities. Some theorists suggest that these anomalies might result from advanced technologies manipulating dimensions or frequencies, potentially operating within a framework similar to that exploited by remote viewing.
Remote viewers today continue to focus on UAPs, seeking to decode their purpose, origins, or even occupants. Reports from these sessions frequently describe encounters with glowing orbs, structured craft, or entities that are either humanoid or entirely alien. These experiences suggest that the phenomenon may interact with consciousness itself, inviting speculation that UAPs, like remote viewing, tap into a universal field of awareness.
3. Remote Viewing and Paranormal Phenomena
Paranormal experiences often mirror the principles of remote viewing: perceiving entities or events beyond the reach of ordinary senses. Remote viewers have described encountering ghostly apparitions, shadowy figures, or even hearing disembodied voices during their sessions. In some cases, they report perceiving entire environments that align with descriptions of “haunted” locations.
Consider the accounts of viewers who targeted historically significant sites known for paranormal activity. Descriptions often matched documented phenomena such as unexplained cold spots, residual sounds, or the presence of “energy fields” suggestive of spiritual entities. These overlaps raise the possibility that remote viewing operates within the same metaphysical space as paranormal events, accessing realms or dimensions where such phenomena exist.
Interestingly, many paranormal hotspots—like Skinwalker Ranch in Utah—show a blend of paranormal and UAP activity. Witnesses have described encountering cryptids, glowing orbs, and poltergeist-like activity in these areas. Remote viewers tasked with exploring these locations sometimes report visualizing energy patterns or interdimensional doorways, concepts that echo both spiritual beliefs and modern theoretical physics.
4. The Unified Field of the Unknown
What might explain these connections between remote viewing, UAPs, and paranormal phenomena? One possibility is that all three are manifestations of a singular phenomenon: the interaction between consciousness and a non-physical reality.
Theoretical models like the quantum field theory or holographic universe hypothesis provide potential frameworks for understanding these interactions. If consciousness exists beyond the brain as a field or wave, it could interact with other forms of non-local energy or intelligence. This might explain why remote viewers sometimes encounter UAPs or spirits—they are tuning into the same underlying reality.
Alternatively, the interdimensional hypothesis suggests that UAPs and paranormal entities exist in parallel dimensions and that remote viewing represents a method of briefly accessing those dimensions. The lack of material evidence for these phenomena could result from their transient or “non-physical” nature.
Finally, some researchers propose that these experiences are co-created, influenced by the intentions and beliefs of the observer. This aligns with findings from parapsychology, where the observer effect—familiar in quantum mechanics—is believed to shape paranormal or psychic outcomes.
5. Conclusion: A Journey Worth Exploring
Remote viewing, UAPs, and paranormal phenomena each challenge our understanding of reality. When examined together, they suggest a tantalizing possibility: that humanity is on the brink of uncovering deeper truths about consciousness and its role in shaping the universe.
Far from being isolated mysteries, these phenomena may represent interconnected aspects of a larger, unified framework. Remote viewing could be the key to understanding not just distant locations or objects, but the very nature of reality itself. The connections to UAPs and paranormal activity hint at dimensions yet to be explored—both within and beyond human perception.
By embracing these mysteries, we take the first steps toward integrating them into scientific inquiry and cultural understanding. The journey is as much about expanding the boundaries of knowledge as it is about questioning the limits we impose on what is possible.
The paper “UFO Evidence 1964” analyzes historical UFO sightings and draws parallels with contemporary reports, highlighting the consistency of government awareness. It discusses diverse witness accounts, including military and civilian observations, and emphasizes unexplained electromagnetic effects linked to sightings. The findings call for renewed congressional and academic attention on UFO phenomena.
The paper titled “UFO Evidence 1964” is a comprehensive report that presents an analysis of Unidentified Flying Object (UFO) sightings and related phenomena.
What we find most surprising (or unsuprising) at Fortean Winds is how closely this report resembles the Pentagon’s Preliminary Assesment of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena. We find the NICAP report released in 1964 describes all of the same objects, characteristics and behaviors described in the Pentagon’s report.
Indicating whatever is evidencing advanced flight characteristics today was documented doing the same by the government which is now publicly, “supposedly” wondering if those same objects are hostile drones. That doesn’t make a whole lot of sense does it?
The NICAP 1964 report reveals that modern-day discussions on UFO phenomena mirror those from decades past. It emphasizes that these objects are not a new phenomenon, and governments have long been aware of their existence, yet have actively kept this knowledge from the public.
Here is a link to the full UFO Evidence paper from the office of the CIA. The content is structured into various sections, each focusing on different aspects of UFO sightings and investigations. Here is a brief overview:
SUMMARY
Introduction: Pages i-iii
Sections:
I. Cross-Section Digest: General features of UFO reports (p. 1)
II. Intelligent Control: Cases indicating intelligence (p. 9)
III. Air Force Investigations: Sightings by Air Force personnel (p. 19)
IV. Army, Navy & Marine Corps: Reports by other military personnel (p. 29)
V. Pilot & Aviation Experts: Observations by pilots (p. 33)
VI. Scientists & Engineers: Observations by professionals (p. 49)
VII. Officials & Citizens: Sightings by police, civil defense, and citizens (p. 61)
VIII. Special Evidence: Electro-magnetic effects, radar cases, etc. (p. 73)
IX. Air Force Investigation: Analysis of Air Force UFO investigation (p. 105)
X. Foreign Reports: International sightings and attitudes (p. 118)
XI. The Chronology: Chronological listing of sightings and events (p. 129)
XII. The Patterns: Analysis of appearance, flight characteristics, etc. (p. 143)
XIII. Congress & the UFOs: Congressional interest in UFOs (p. 173)
XIV. Problems & Dangers: Implications and need for investigation (p. 179)
The cover of the 1964 NICAP report. Click to download the report.
AUTHOR ORGANIZATIONS
The organization involved is NICAP (National Investigations Committee on Aerial Phenomena), as indicated in the introduction.
FINDINGS
General Features of UFO Reports: Includes sample cases that exhibit the general characteristics of UFO sightings.
Military Observations: Accounts from various branches of the military detailing their encounters with UFOs.
Scientific and Expert Testimonies: Observations from pilots, scientists, and engineers.
Public and Official Reports: Sightings reported by police, civil defense personnel, and general citizens.
Special Evidence: Includes electromagnetic effects, radar cases, and other physical evidence.
International Perspective: Discusses UFO sightings and attitudes in countries other than the USA.
Chronological and Pattern Analysis: Presents a chronological list of sightings and analyzes the patterns observed in these events.
STUDY DETAILS
Approach: The report synthesizes data from various reports and sightings over 20 years.
Focus: Emphasis on the qualifications of the observers and the reliability of the reports.
Scope: Covers a broad range of sightings and includes a significant number of cases for analysis.
STUDY QUALITY
Sample Size: Extensive, covering over 700 selected reports from a larger pool.
Confidence Intervals & P-Values: Not applicable, as this is more of an observational and qualitative study rather than quantitative research.
Effect Size: Significant variations in reported sightings, indicating a broad range of phenomena.
Study Design: Compilation of reports rather than a controlled study, thus less reliable in a scientific context.
Consistency of Results: Varied; some consistent patterns are observed but not universally.
Data Analysis Methods: Primarily qualitative and observational.
Researcher’s Interpretation: Focused on presenting reported data; interpretations lean towards considering UFOs as a significant, unexplained phenomenon.
Notable Figures and Quotes:
Engaging figures such as Dr. J. Allen Hynek, a respected astrophysicist, provide context to this report. Hynek, who was initially skeptical of UFO phenomena, later admitted that many sightings could not be easily dismissed. His involvement gives credibility to the argument that UFOs are a serious scientific and government matter.
Patterns and Repeated Observations
Physical Appearance: The UFOs were commonly described as metallic disc-like objects, rocket-like objects, or luminous objects appearing as lights at night. These descriptions were consistent over the 22 years covered in the report.
Shape: Discs, spheres, ovals, and triangular shapes were frequently reported, with a significant percentage being flat, circular objects. Some UFOs were compared to the planet Saturn, resembling flattened spheres with centrally located surrounding rings.
Color: During daylight, UFOs were mostly reported as silver or white. At night, they appeared as bright light sources, varying in color across the spectrum, including red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and occasionally changing colors during observation.
Maneuvers: Common maneuvers included hovering or very slow motion followed by sudden rapid acceleration, circling and pacing human vehicles, UFOs rendezvousing and operating together, and satellite objects associated with larger UFOs.
“Portholes”: Many UFOs seen at close range displayed features like “portholes” or “windows,” with markings arranged in straight lines or circular patterns, often along the major axis of the UFO.
Electromagnetic Field Effects
The document details numerous instances where UFO sightings were accompanied by electromagnetic effects. These effects included interference with radio and television signals, disruptions in car engines and headlights, and effects on aircraft instrumentation.
Specific cases described situations where the presence of a UFO seemingly caused car engines to stall and headlights to dim or fail. In several instances, these effects were temporary and ceased as soon as the UFO departed.
In a few reported cases, aircraft instruments malfunctioned or behaved erratically during UFO encounters. Pilots reported compasses spinning uncontrollably and navigation systems failing.
Some sightings mentioned a noticeable absence of sound, suggesting an electromagnetic silence or dampening effect in the vicinity of the UFO.
The patterns and electromagnetic effects detailed in the report suggest a level of technological sophistication and consistent behavior across different sightings. These observations have been a significant point of interest and speculation among UFO researchers for more than 100 years.
This report was the most extensive of its day and given its contents, methodology and credibility, a rational person could expect action by Congress and Academia…yet, next to nothing.
The article advocates for a dual-approach in researching Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and paranormal events, blending traditional scientific methods with intelligence analysis. It highlights the limitations of conventional science in addressing these elusive phenomena and proposes integrating interdisciplinary insights and innovative methodologies to foster a comprehensive understanding of such occurrences.
The field of Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and paranormal research has gained significant attention, spurred by numerous credible reports and government acknowledgments of the phenomena.
However, the scientific community remains largely skeptical and constrained by methodologies that may not fully address the unique nature of these occurrences. This article proposes that UAP and paranormal research should diverge from mainstream science, adopting a dual-approach: one rooted in traditional scientific methods and the other in intelligence analysis.
The Limitations of Traditional Scientific Methods
Mainstream science relies heavily on the scientific method, which demands observable, measurable, and repeatable data. This approach has undoubtedly been the bedrock of technological and scientific advancement, providing a structured pathway to understanding the natural world. However, when it comes to UAP and paranormal phenomena, this method encounters significant limitations:
Elusive Nature of the Phenomena: UAPs often appear and disappear rapidly, leaving little to no physical evidence. Paranormal activities, too, are notoriously transient and subjective, often defying conventional measurement.
Technological Superiority: If the intelligence behind UAPs is indeed technologically advanced, it could easily evade our current detection and measurement capabilities, rendering traditional scientific tools ineffective.
Lack of Physical Samples: The absence of tangible artifacts or consistent physical evidence poses a significant barrier to traditional scientific investigation, which depends on the analysis of such samples.
Given these constraints, it is imperative to consider an alternative approach that can complement traditional scientific efforts without being hindered by their limitations.
Intelligence Analysis: A Complementary Approach
The field of intelligence analysis, traditionally used in military and security contexts, offers a promising complementary approach to UAP and paranormal research. This method focuses on collecting, analyzing, and interpreting data to understand capabilities, features, and intentions, even in the absence of direct physical evidence.
Data Collection and Correlation: Intelligence analysis relies on collecting various forms of data, including eyewitness accounts, radar logs, satellite imagery, and other indirect evidence. By correlating these diverse sources, researchers can identify patterns and anomalies that might not be apparent through conventional scientific methods.
Behavioral Analysis: Understanding the behavior and patterns of UAPs can provide insights into their capabilities and possible intentions. This approach mirrors techniques used in intelligence to anticipate the actions of adversaries based on observed behavior.
Predictive Modeling: By developing models based on historical data and observed patterns, intelligence analysis can help predict future occurrences and potentially guide where and how to focus observational efforts.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Integrating insights from various fields such as psychology, sociology, and even folklore can enrich the analysis, providing a broader understanding of the phenomena beyond just the physical aspects.
The Path Forward: Integrating Science and Intelligence Analysis
While traditional scientific research remains crucial, it is clear that a new branch dedicated to intelligence analysis is necessary to advance our understanding of UAP and paranormal phenomena. This dual-approach ensures that we are not limited by the constraints of our current scientific paradigms but are also not abandoning the rigorous standards of evidence that science demands.
Establishing Research Frameworks: Developing structured methodologies for intelligence analysis in UAP research will provide a framework for systematic investigation, similar to how the scientific method structures traditional research.
Training and Education: Academics and researchers should be trained in intelligence analysis techniques, fostering a new generation of researchers who can bridge the gap between science and intelligence analysis.
Institutional Support: Universities, research institutions, and government agencies need to recognize and support this dual-approach, allocating resources and funding to both scientific and intelligence analysis efforts.
Public Engagement: Transparency and communication with the public are essential to maintain trust and support for research efforts. Engaging with the public through open forums, publications, and media can help demystify the phenomena and the research process.
In conclusion, the unique and often elusive nature of UAP and paranormal phenomena necessitates a bifurcated research approach. By combining traditional scientific methods with intelligence analysis, we can create a robust framework capable of tackling the complexities of these phenomena, ultimately leading to a deeper and more comprehensive understanding. This dual-approach not only respects the rigor of science but also embraces the innovative and adaptive strategies of intelligence analysis, paving the way for breakthroughs in one of the most intriguing fields of modern research.
The article discusses the potential link between the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) and increased Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) activity in South America. It highlights ancient tunnels connecting locations like Nazca and Colares, suggesting a relationship between these tunnels and UAP sightings. The SAA’s unique radiation levels may attract UAPs, necessitating further research.
Update: 7/27/2024
We’ve been playing around with mapping ancient tunnel systems (they seem related)…and this article might be mildly wrong. The South American Anomaly might not be the main reason these beings are appearing in this location. Perhaps it’s part of it, but there is a very solid connection in this region between high intensity UAP activity and the ancient tunnels of Peru. As proof we’d submit the following:
Map of known ancient tunnels around the world – Fortean WindsMap of Ancient South American Tunnel System – Fortean Winds
We weren’t looking for this connection when we noticed it, so that made it all the more shocking. These regions are well known for intense and hostile UAP activity, and they’re all connected by these tunnels.
Tunnels the Peruvian Government sealed up.
Be great to know more…We’ll dig into this some and get back to you…
Introduction
The South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) has long been a topic of interest among geophysicists and space scientists due to its unique position where the Earth’s inner Van Allen radiation belt comes closest to the surface. This results in an area with higher-than-normal levels of ionizing radiation. Our research suggests that this anomaly might be linked to increased Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) activity in regions like Peru and Nazca. This article explores this connection, highlighting historical and recent UAP encounters and examining the potential reasons behind this correlation.
The South Atlantic Anomaly: A Brief Overview
The SAA is a region centered off the coast of South America where the Earth’s magnetic field is weaker, allowing more energetic particles from the Sun to penetrate the atmosphere. This results in increased levels of ionizing radiation, which affects satellites, space missions, and even terrestrial electronics.
Historical and Modern UAP Sightings in South America
The Nazca Lines and Peru:
The Nazca Lines, ancient geoglyphs located in southern Peru, have been the center of speculation regarding extraterrestrial activity. These massive designs, visible only from the air, have sparked theories about ancient astronauts and extraterrestrial influence.
Modern reports of UAPs in Peru describe unexplained lights and objects performing extraordinary maneuvers in the sky. These sightings are often reported by locals and have been documented by both amateur and professional researchers.
Brazil and the Colares Incident:
The Colares incident in 1977 is one of the most well-documented UAP encounters in Brazil. Residents of Colares Island reported being attacked by beams of light from UAPs, which caused burns, puncture wounds, and other injuries. These incidents were investigated by the Brazilian Air Force under Operation Prato.
Recent sightings in Brazil continue to report similar phenomena, with lights and objects appearing in the sky and displaying behaviors that defy conventional explanations.
Iquitos Sightings: Local residents in Iquitos, Peru have reported numerous UAP sightings. These include physical attacks, strange hovering objects, and Non-Human encounters. The frequency and nature of these sightings suggest a pattern that correlates with the SAA’s influence.
The Van Allen belt is a zone of energetic charged particles, primarily electrons and protons, that are captured by Earth’s magnetic field. There are two main belts: the inner and the outer Van Allen belts. The inner belt extends from about 1,000 to 12,000 kilometers above Earth’s surface and contains high concentrations of protons with energies exceeding 100 MeV. The outer belt extends from about 13,500 to 58,000 kilometers and primarily contains electrons with energies ranging from 0.1 to 10 MeV. These belts are shaped by Earth’s magnetic field and play a crucial role in protecting the planet from solar wind and cosmic radiation, but they can pose hazards to satellites and astronauts due to the high radiation levels.
Connecting the South Atlantic Anomaly to UAP Activity
The hypothesis that the SAA could be influencing UAP activity in South America is grounded in several observations:
Increased Radiation Levels: The SAA’s high levels of ionizing radiation might be attracting UAPs, similar to how they are often reported near nuclear sites and areas with higher radioactivity.
Geographical Correlation: The areas with the highest reported UAP activities, such as Peru and Brazil, fall within or near the boundaries of the SAA.
Supporting Evidence
Scientific Research: Studies on the SAA have highlighted the increased radiation levels in this region and its effects on satellites and space missions. For instance, the increased flux of energetic particles in the SAA has been shown to cause significant interference with spacecraft electronics (Ancient Pages) (Thoughtnova).
Historical Accounts: A review of historical UAP reports shows a higher incidence of sightings and encounters in regions affected by the SAA. These include well-documented cases like the Colares incident and numerous modern-day reports from areas like the Nazca region (ANCIENT ARCHAEOLOGY –) (ANN | Archaeology news network).
Conclusion
The correlation between the South Atlantic Anomaly and heightened UAP activity in South America presents a compelling case for further study. The combination of historical evidence, scientific data, and modern reports suggests that the SAA’s unique characteristics may play a role in attracting UAPs to this region. Further interdisciplinary research could provide more insights into this intriguing connection, potentially uncovering new dimensions of both UAP phenomena and geophysical anomalies.
The exploration of UAP phenomena leads to questions about consciousness, suggesting that these entities possess advanced capabilities, including telepathy and time manipulation. The need for interdisciplinary research is emphasized, correlating psychological, environmental, and quantum theories while proposing a framework to understand possible interactions between humans and Ultra-terrestrials.
If you’ve been following our UAP podcast and website, you’ve been following a standard UFO research journey. You start with trying to determine if flying saucers are real. Once you’ve figured out they are real, you move onto what they are…that takes some twists and turns but it lands you somewhere in the realm of consciousness studies.
We don’t know what consciousness is. I don’t mean just us at Fortean Winds don’t know what consciousness is…humans don’t know what consciousness is.
So, being the material generation, we pretend like it doesn’t exist or relegate it to the fringes of hippy pseudoscience. Which works until it doesn’t…when we’re confronted with the reality of consciousness and its potential effects on our everyday lives, we can either dive into what science exists or dismiss it as Woo (fluff, wild theory).
Yet, these NHI and this phenomenon seem to have a greater control and understanding of consciousness than we do. If nothing else, that tells us there is so much there we have yet to discover…
If discovery is not sufficient motivation, how about survival? These beings have utilized their understanding of consciousness to control minds (see Chris Bledsoe, Fatima). They can freeze people in place, or send them on a journey to another world akin to our own but filled with fantastic creatures and unique differences (see the “Oz Effect and Hitchhiker Effect”).
Whether or not these experiences actually transport the person to another physical realm, or the experience is simulated, is unclear.
What is clear is that the NHI have this capability.
It’s intimidating to consider the fact these beings could be listening to your thoughts…all the time. Do they?
We doubt it. We have to accept they could potentially read thoughts, as we have evidence of numerous credible cases in which these beings communicate telepathically. Yet, why would they want to hear my thoughts about the latest Taylor Swift album? Seems like a waste of time (I didn’t get it).
At Fortean Winds we classify these NHI as “Ultra-terrestrials” because they live here (on planet earth) often enough to be considered terrestrial. And the “Ultra” refers to their capabilities. Not their point of origin. We’ve seen credible cases where these beings…
Can see back and forth in time
Pilot and control technology far beyond ours
Transport people into a land like Oz (apparently another reality)
Materialize and dematerialize matter
Read thoughts and communicate telepathically
Create potergeist-like activity
Appear as religious apparitions and strange monsters
Move through water and earth as if it were air (transmedium)
Transform shape (including mirroring humans)
Interact with humans on a purely psychic level…
Those are facts. We’ve seen these capabilities repeated in credible cases, reported by reliable observers and sometimes including material evidence.
We won’t spend a lot of time on this. The research community appears to be coming around to this set of facts. Good. They have to be accepted in order to be studied.
But then what…if these beings have just about every capability we can imagine, how do we go about studying them?
There is a temptation to just throw up your hands and consider them all powerful, mostly ambivalent and ignore them, or some may be tempted to worship them.
We would argue that neither of those solutions are terribly fruitful.
Instead the next logical steps are:
1) Open study and transparent information sharing of UAP discoveries
2) Attempt open and transparent communication with the NHI.
It doesn’t seem logical to us to worship something which does not make its motives clear. It also doesn’t make sense to ignore something so powerful and potentially informative…that is here…and interacts with us.
Given the confusing and disparate nature of this phenomenon and its capabilities, it seems the only way to get to the truth…is to ask. Communication is the logical next step.
We should accept that this is a multi-faceted phenomenon, which does not make itself known. In fact, it goes out of its way to hide its existence.
The fact that this phenomenon involves material craft and bodies, which are being studied, moves it out of the hippy pseudoscience category and into the WTF category?
If these things are real then all the capabilities they display are possible…and what does that say about our material reality? About our material science?
It says that it’s incomplete. But we already know that, don’t we? When did we decide we had it all figured out?
So, why can’t we ask the all-important questions? The ones that take us out of the realm of new age philosophy and into discovery.
Such as, how can something be both objective and subjective? Both material and immaterial? And why are there so many disparate pieces to this phenomenon?
This question touches on a fundamental and intriguing aspect of the phenomenon involving UAPs, abductions, cryptid sightings, and religious experiences: why do these phenomena sometimes manifest physically and other times psychically or para-physically? Here are some frameworks which attempt to explain these phenomena:
1. Jungian Theory and the Collective Unconscious:
Archetypes and Manifestations: Jung proposed that archetypes from the collective unconscious can manifest in various forms, reflecting both personal and collective human experiences. These archetypes might manifest as physical entities or experiences under certain conditions, especially when collective societal or personal psychological states are conducive.
Symbolic Representation: Physical sightings and psychic experiences could be different ways in which the unconscious mind externalizes internal conflicts, fears, or hopes. The physical manifestations could be a way for the psyche to confront and process these archetypes tangibly, while psychic experiences might represent a more internalized, introspective process. While Jung’s theories may be informative to the phenomenon as a whole (we think so), it can’t be the entirety of it, as there are ships and bodies. Can humans manifest ships and bodies which are sentient through their collective unconscious? Seems unlikely, but it may be that the phenomenon chooses its forms and is otherwise informed by Jungian theory.
Interdimensional Hypotheses: The idea that these phenomena might originate from other dimensions can explain their variable manifestations. Entities or objects could be crossing over from different realities, sometimes interacting with our physical world and other times influencing our minds more subtly. Check out our article on Tesla and Einstein for some quantum hypothesizing.
3. Consciousness and Perception:
Observer Effect: In quantum physics, the observer effect suggests that the act of observation can influence the state of a particle. Similarly, the state of the observer’s consciousness could influence whether an experience is physical or psychic. The expectation, belief, and mental state of the observer might shape how the phenomenon manifests.
Psychosocial Context: The cultural and social context can also influence the form these phenomena take. In societies with a strong belief in physical cryptids, sightings might be more common. Conversely, in cultures with a focus on spiritual or psychic experiences, these might be more prevalent. Combining Jungian theory with quantum physics where the expectations of the observer inform the observed…and we may have something.
4. Parapsychological Perspectives:
PK (Psychokinesis): Some parapsychologists suggest that psychokinetic abilities might enable individuals to manifest physical phenomena through psychic means. This theory posits that the mind can influence physical reality, leading to tangible manifestations of what might otherwise be considered purely psychological phenomena.
Collective Energy: The collective energy of a group or society, particularly in times of stress or significant change, could potentially trigger both physical and psychic manifestations. This might explain why certain periods and locations are hotspots for UAP sightings, cryptid reports, and spiritual experiences. Paranormal researchers often discuss liminal (places in a state of change) states as a precursor to a paranormal experience. Sites such as hospitals, schools and transportation hubs often report activity.
5. Environmental and Electromagnetic Factors:
Electromagnetic Fields (EMF): High levels of electromagnetic fields are often reported in areas with frequent UAP sightings and paranormal activity. EMFs can affect human perception and consciousness, potentially inducing both physical and psychic experiences.
Geophysical Anomalies: Certain geographic locations with unique magnetic or gravitational properties might act as focal points for these phenomena, facilitating both physical appearances and psychic experiences depending on the environmental conditions. These geophysical regions may be influenced by temporal factors and the observer.
The variability in the manifestation of these phenomena—sometimes physical, sometimes psychic—likely involves a complex interplay of psychological, environmental, and possibly quantum factors. Jungian theory provides a valuable framework for understanding the symbolic and archetypal dimensions of these experiences, while quantum and parapsychological theories offer insights into the mechanisms that might allow for such diverse manifestations.
Were you expecting an easy answer? Well, we have a simplified version, that we think holds up for now, and could then be expanded based on more data.
The Fortean Winds: Integrative UAP Hypothesis
Our research framework, which considers the interplay of the right person, place, and time, aligns well with the multidimensional nature of UAPs and related phenomena. This integrative approach can potentially offer a more comprehensive understanding of these elusive experiences. In short, this is how we think it(the phenomenon, NHI, whatever) works…
1. The Right Person:
Sensitivity and Connection: Some individuals appear to have a heightened sensitivity or a particular connection to these phenomena, which might be due to innate psychic abilities, previous experiences, or even genetic factors. Studies have suggested that certain people are more prone to experiencing paranormal phenomena, possibly due to their cognitive or perceptual traits.
Psychological and Emotional State: The mental and emotional state of the individual can influence their susceptibility to these experiences. Stress, trauma, and heightened emotional states are often reported in conjunction with sightings and encounters.
2. The Right Place:
Geophysical Anomalies: Locations with unique geophysical properties, such as high levels of EMF, geomagnetic anomalies, or specific mineral compositions, are often hotspots for paranormal activity and UAP sightings. Skinwalker Ranch in Utah is a notable example, known for its diverse range of unexplained phenomena, potentially linked to its unique geological features.
Historical and Cultural Significance: Certain places with rich histories of paranormal or spiritual activity might act as focal points. These areas could be imbued with cultural and symbolic significance, which might enhance their propensity for such phenomena.
3. The Right Time:
Temporal Factors: Time-related factors, such as specific times of the year (e.g., solstices, equinoxes), lunar cycles, and even certain hours of the day, might play a role in the manifestation of these phenomena. Some researchers suggest that these times could align with natural cycles that amplify environmental energies (livescience.com).
Cosmic and Astrological Influences: Cosmic events, such as solar flares, planetary alignments, and meteor showers, might also influence the occurrence of these phenomena. The idea is that these events can create fluctuations in the Earth’s electromagnetic field, potentially making it easier for interdimensional interactions or psychic phenomena to occur.
Case Studies and Examples:
Skinwalker Ranch:This site is known for a wide array of paranormal phenomena, including UAP sightings, cryptid encounters, and unexplained physical effects. Researchers have noted the presence of unusual magnetic and gravitational anomalies in the area, suggesting a link between the physical environment and the observed phenomena.
Hudson Valley Sightings: In the 1980s, the Hudson Valley in New York became a hotspot for UAP sightings. Many witnesses reported experiencing both physical sightings of craft and psychic phenomena, suggesting a combined influence of geophysical and psychological factors.
The Integrative Hypothesis:
The convergence of these factors can be viewed through an integrative hypothesis:
The Individual: People with certain sensitivities, previous experiences, family history, genetics and/or psychological predispositions may act as catalysts for these experiences.
The Environment: Geophysical anomalies and specific locations may provide the necessary conditions for these phenomena to manifest.
Temporal Conditions: Certain times may align environmental energies in ways that facilitate the occurrence of these phenomena.
This hypothesis suggests that a multidisciplinary approach, combining psychology, geology, physics, and cultural studies, is crucial for advancing our understanding of UAPs and related phenomena.
Based on our research (a review of thousands of cases), these are the determining factors of a UAP sighting or related paranormal event. A UAP or paranormal event occurs when the right person is in the right place at the right time.
However, it is missing one important variable and that variable has a huge impact: The Will and Actions of the NHI
These beings are conducting themselves and their activities according to their own agenda. We would argue that incidents. where these principles are not deterministic, occurred simply because it suited the NHI agenda (whatever that may be).
Yet, we consider it possible the factors in the integrated hypothesis may limit the time and targets which the NHI have available.
This NHI agenda needs to be studied both separately and in parallel, but it has to be viewed differently. We need to understand what the NHI achieved or hoped to achieve in these encounters. This is more like behavioral profiling.
A review of the cases has to be done to develop a reliable case pool and then the cases need to be analyzed to determine what the encounter most likely provided to the NHI and how it affected the contactee.
We’ve done this exercise, and the effects of the encounters appear to be mixed. Meaning they sometimes positively (healing, wisdom) but more often negatively (trauma, radiation) affect the individual. This could be the result of different factions of NHI interacting with humanity differently, or it could speak to a larger control mechanism and a long term plan of their own design. The NHI agenda, at this point, is unclear to everyone…
Additionally, we should note that these factors appear to work independently and in combination. For example, if you’re in the super right place at the super right time, it may not be necessary to be the right person. Conversely, if you’re the right person, the right place and time may be more flexible.
This is how it appears to work based on our current review and the state of our research. The Hitchhiker Effect also has an outsized effect on paranormal and UAP occurrences and points to a genetic or biological component to this phenomenon. This is noted in the integrative hypothesis as “family history” and “previous experiences.”
How’s that for deconstructing the woo…What could be more earthly than human biology?
De-Mystifying the Mystical:
We’ve assigned these beings the “mystical or magical” label because our ancestors didn’t know a lot about material science. We do. Yet, what we know is incomplete. Science and history are ever-evolving subjects. We don’t know what we don’t know. If nothing else, they’ve shown us that what we thought is impossible is not. That’s not magical or mystical…it’s opportunity.
Yet, it takes courage to accept the facts in UAP and Paranormal encounters. It takes the courage to research it and then it takes courage to believe credible people relaying incredible things.
That normally wouldn’t seem like much…except they keep saying the same thing…for thousands of years.
But the real challenge is accepting what you’ve found as fact and moving forward with it. Moving forward involves open and transparent study of the phenomenon we’ve outlined. That study should result in an effort of open and transparent communication with this phenomenon.
How would we communicate with the phenomenon? Naturally, we got some ideas!
Appendix: Integrating the Integrated
For those interested in pursuing the Integrated Hypotheses we offer the following suggestions:
Consciousness Studies and UAPs:
Highlight the link between consciousness and UAPs, emphasizing the need for interdisciplinary studies involving neuroscience, psychology, and parapsychology to understand these interactions.
Support further exploration of telepathic communication and mind control as observed in credible cases.
Ultra-terrestrials and Their Capabilities:
Document and categorize the capabilities of Ultra-terrestrials as observed: time manipulation, transmedium travel, telepathy, shape-shifting, and more.
Establish a database of credible cases and analyze patterns in these abilities.
Frameworks for Understanding the Phenomenon:
Integrate Jungian theory, quantum mechanics, and parapsychological perspectives into the analytical models.
Develop a cross-disciplinary research agenda to explore these theories in relation to UAPs.
Environmental and Electromagnetic Factors:
Investigate hotspots like Skinwalker Ranch and the Hudson Valley for unique geophysical properties.
Study the impact of EMFs and other geophysical anomalies on human perception and UAP manifestations.
The Integrative UAP Hypothesis:
Use the proposed framework (right person, place, and time) to analyze and predict UAP encounters.
Consider the NHI agenda in case studies to understand their motives and long-term plans.
De-Mystifying the Mystical:
Promote the idea that UAP phenomena, while seemingly mystical, are opportunities for scientific exploration.
Encourage open-minded yet rigorous research methodologies.
Fortean Winds: Scientific Research into the Unexplained, Paranormal and Anomalous 